In-Situ Coal Gasification: Model Calculations and Laboratory Experiments

1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.B. Thorsness ◽  
R.B. Rozsa

Abstract One concept for in-situ coal gasification involves fracturing thick, deep, coal seams using chemical explosives. The resultant high-permeability zone then would be ignited and reacted with a steam/ oxygen mixture to produce medium-Btu gas suitable for upgrading to pipeline quality in a surface plant. This paper discusses the calculational modeling and supporting laboratory experiments relating to the gasification process. The primary aim of this preliminary work is to predict and correlate reaction preliminary work is to predict and correlate reaction and thermal-front propagation rates and product gas composition as a function of bed properties and process operating conditions. process operating conditions. Our initial efforts are restricted to onedimensional, transient Darcy flow in a permeable packed bed. The numerical calculations include a packed bed. The numerical calculations include a detailed description of the reacting system chemistry (13 species) with appropriate reaction rates and over-all heat and mass transport in the system. Comparison of calculated results with experimental data from a packed-bed combustion tube shows good agreement for reaction-zone propagation rates and produced-gas compositions. propagation rates and produced-gas compositions. However, the sensitivity of the calculations to other reaction-rate and transport-coefficient models should be investigated. Introduction In-situ coal gasification has received renewed interest recently. It offers four potential advantages over conventional mining and subsequent surface processing of coal: (1) the product gas may be processing of coal:the product gas may be cheaper because of lower capital investment requirements;environmental damage is likely to be lower;hazards to miners are avoided; andit may make possible the exploitation of coal resources too deeply buried for economical recovery by conventional strip or deep mining operations. The Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (LLL) packed-bed concept for coal gasification was packed-bed concept for coal gasification was originated in 1972. Major program funding by the U.S. ERDA began in 1974. The LLL concept is designed to recover medium-Btu gas from the thick, deeply buried, subbituminous coal deposits prevalent in the western U.S. After upgrading in a prevalent in the western U.S. After upgrading in a surface facility the product gas would have sufficiently high energy density to make pipeline distribution attractive economically. The packed-bed concept calls for creating a permeable zone of coal by detonating chemical permeable zone of coal by detonating chemical explosives in an array of drilled boreholes. The top of the resulting permeable zone is supplied and a steam/oxygen reactant mixture is supplied. The oxidation reactions produce a high-temperature zone that propagates through the bed as a slowmoving thermal wave. The thermal wave first dries the coal downstream from the reaction zone and then pyrolyzes (devolatilizes) it, forming a char. The char undergoes further reactions with the steam present. The major products of the over-all process include H2, CO, CH4, and CO2 as gases, process include H2, CO, CH4, and CO2 as gases, and water and tar as liquids. Mathematical modeling and laboratory experimentation have been carried out to increase understanding of the important parameters of the in-situ gasification process. The purpose of this paper is to present a mathematical description of paper is to present a mathematical description of the gasification process, together with results obtained from calculations and laboratory-scale gasification reactor experiments. The long-range goal of our modeling effort is to acquire the ability to predict resource recovery for a variety of different field geometries and operating conditions. This is a multidimensional, multiphase flow problem. The preliminary model described here is a transient, one-dimensional model of the gasification process in a packed bed. The primary reason for its development is to provide a framework in which to test the importance of accurate specification of the large number of physical and chemical processes involved in gasification. This will be accomplished primarily through comparisons with carefully controlled experiments performed in the 1.6-m reactor. SPEJ P. 105

Author(s):  
Armin Silaen ◽  
Ting Wang

Numerical simulations of the coal gasification process inside a generic 2-stage entrained-flow gasifier fed with Indonesian coal at approximately 2000 metric ton/day are carried out. The 3D Navier–Stokes equations and eight species transport equations are solved with three heterogeneous global reactions, three homogeneous reactions, and two-step thermal cracking equation of volatiles. The chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model is used for the devolatilization process. This study is conducted to investigate the effects of different operation parameters on the gasification process including coal mixture (dry versus slurry), oxidant (oxygen-blown versus air-blown), and different coal distribution between two stages. In the two-stage coal-slurry feed operation, the dominant reactions are intense char combustion in the first stage and enhanced gasification reactions in the second stage. The gas temperature in the first stage for the dry-fed case is about 800 K higher than the slurry-fed case. This calls for attention of additional refractory maintenance in the dry-fed case. One-stage operation yields higher H2, CO and CH4 combined than if a two-stage operation is used, but with a lower syngas heating value. The higher heating value (HHV) of syngas for the one-stage operation is 7.68 MJ/kg, compared with 8.24 MJ/kg for two-stage operation with 75%–25% fuel distribution and 9.03 MJ/kg for two-stage operation with 50%–50% fuel distribution. Carbon conversion efficiency of the air-blown case is 77.3%, which is much lower than that of the oxygen-blown case (99.4%). The syngas heating value for the air-blown case is 4.40 MJ/kg, which is almost half of the heating value of the oxygen-blown case (8.24 MJ/kg).


2012 ◽  
Vol 524-527 ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Tao Liu ◽  
Hong Yao ◽  
Kai Yao ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
Guang Qian Luo

According to the temperature, major chemical reactions and gas compositions, the gasification process along the tunnel of underground coal gasification is divided into three zones, i.e. oxidation zone, reduction zone and dry distillation zone. A model test in the laboratory was carried out by using large-scale coal blocks to simulate the coal seam. The characteristics of the “three zones”, and the relation between the temperature and gas composition were also quantitative studied. It provided the necessary basic knowledge for further studying the process of underground coal gasification, including predicting compositions of product gas, life-cycle analyzing, selecting optimistic control parameters and determining suitable gasification craft.


Author(s):  
Federico Bonzani ◽  
Paolo Gobbo

In order to increase the fuel flexibility of the current design of the SynGas burner [4,5,6], Ansaldo Energia, since the growing requests of the market, performed a R&D financed project to use the SynGas fuel available as the unique fuel to feed the gas turbine. Therefore the new working condition to be fulfilled by the modified SynGas burner are the following: a) ignition; b) acceleration; c) loading at part load; d) change over from diffusion line to main SynGas line. To fulfill with new requirements, the standard V94.2K burners have been modified in order to operate from ignition up to the change over point with a SynGas mixture provided by the coal gasification process of a typical IGCC plant [7]. After the design phase, a experimental test campaign on the new design burner has been performed at atmospheric pressure. In order to validate the test results carried out at actual engine working conditions a further test campaign has been performed at the high pressure consistent with the test rig technical limitations [2.3]. The paper show the results carried out that are really promising to meet the customer requirements.


Author(s):  
Michael S. Blinderman

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) is a gasification process carried on in non-mined coal seams using injection and production wells drilled from the surface, converting coal in situ into a product gas usable for chemical processes and power generation. The UCG process developed, refined and practiced by Ergo Exergy Technologies is called the Exergy UCG Technology or εUCG® Technology. The εUCG technology is being applied in numerous power generation and chemical projects worldwide. These include power projects in South Africa (1,200 MWe), India (750 MWe), Pakistan, and Canada, as well as chemical projects in Australia and Canada. A number of εUCG based industrial projects are now at a feasibility stage in New Zealand, USA, and Europe. An example of εUCG application is the Chinchilla Project in Australia where the technology demonstrated continuous, consistent production of commercial quantities of quality fuel gas for over 30 months. The project is currently targeting a 24,000 barrel per day synthetic diesel plant based on εUCG syngas supply. The εUCG technology has demonstrated exceptional environmental performance. The εUCG methods and techniques of environmental management are an effective tool to ensure environmental protection during an industrial application. A εUCG-IGCC power plant will generate electricity at a much lower cost than existing or proposed fossil fuel power plants. CO2 emissions of the plant can be reduced to a level 55% less than those of a supercritical coal-fired plant and 25% less than the emissions of NG CC.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 5816
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Kapusta

Two experimental simulations of underground coal gasification (UCG) processes, using large bulk samples of lignites, were conducted in a surface laboratory setup. Two different lignite samples were used for the oxygen-blown experiments, i.e., “Velenje” meta-lignite (Slovenia) and “Oltenia” ortho-lignite (Romania). The average moisture content of the samples was 31.6wt.% and 45.6wt.% for the Velenje and Oltenia samples, respectively. The main aim of the study was to assess the suitability of the tested lignites for the underground coal gasification process. The gas composition and its production rates, as well as the temperatures in the artificial seams, were continuously monitored during the experiments. The average calorific value of gas produced during the Velenje lignite experiment (6.4 MJ/Nm3) was much higher compared to the result obtained for the experiment with Oltenia lignite (4.8 MJ/Nm3). The Velenje lignite test was also characterized by significantly higher energy efficiency, i.e., 44.6%, compared to the gasification of Oltenia lignite (33.4%). The gasification experiments carried out showed that the physicochemical properties of the lignite used considerably affect the in situ gasification process. Research also indicates that UCG can be considered as a viable option for the extraction of lignite deposits; however, lignites with a lower moisture content and higher energy density are preferred, due to their much higher process efficiency.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao ◽  
Wang ◽  
Zheng ◽  
Qin ◽  
Zhou

A co-gasification process was proposed both for treating alkaline organic wastewater and to promote coal gasification by the alkaline substances in situ. A catalytic gasification model was developed by introducing a catalytic correction factor to describe the catalytic effects quantitatively. An integrated process simulation was carried out using Aspen Plus equipped with FORTRAN subroutines. The model was verified using the root mean square error between the simulation results and experimental data from the literature. Syngas composition, cold gas efficiency, and carbon conversion efficiency were analyzed with respect to different operating conditions (reaction temperature, steam/coal ratio, and equivalence ratio). The optimal conditions are summarized based on a self-sufficient system by using sensitivity analysis: Gasification temperature of 700 °C, steam/coal ratio = 1.0, and equivalence ratio = 0.4.


1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (06) ◽  
pp. 740-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Young ◽  
Jack Fischer ◽  
Samuel H. Wong

Abstract Kinetics for the reaction of steam with western U.S. subbituminous chars are described for operating conditions characteristic of those expected during underground coal gasification (UCG). The mineral matter present in these coals has been found to have significant catalytic activity for the water/gas shift reaction. Also, the inorganic constituents of brackish waters occurring naturally in western aquifers have been found to have little effect on the gasification rates. Introduction The in-situ gasification of coal offers significant potential as a means of increasing U.S. utilization of underground hydrocarbons for fuel conversion or producing petrochemical feedstocks. The primary advantage of in-situ gasification is utilization of coal reserves that cannot be recovered economically by conventional techniques. Additional advantages lie in the potential reduction of capital and operating costs, pollution control costs, feedwater quality requirements, and health and safety problems associated with conventional coal-processing technologies. Early efforts to develop in-situ gasification technology have been described in reviews by Capp et al.1 and Elder.2 Since the 1930's, there have been extensive developmental efforts in the USSR, and since 1972 there has been a resurgence of experimental studies - both in the laboratory and in the field - in the U.S. and Canada. Both Soviet tests and recent tests carried out in the Western Hemisphere are discussed in detail in Ref. 3. Depending on the geological conditions of the coal seam and the properties of the coal, the configuration and operating procedures of an underground gasifier can vary significantly. Regardless of the configuration of the underground gasifier and the preparation techniques used for coal seam gasification, the gasifier can be envisioned as consisting of several distinct reaction zones very similar to those occurring in moving-bed gas producers, such as a Lurgi gasifier. The zone nearest the product recovery well is the drying and pyrolysis zone, in which water is driven from the coal and the pyrolysis reactions occur. Tars produced in this zone are driven forward continually into the cooler regions of the seam, with a portion being cracked to lighter hydrocarbons. Cracking proceeds until the tars are light enough to be carried with the product gas stream out of the coal seam. The reducing zone or gasification zone is immediately behind the pyrolysis zone. In this area, the primary reactions areEquations 1 through 5 The water necessary for Reaction 1 is supplied either by injection of steam with the air or oxygen or by natural intrusion of water into the reaction zone if the coal seam is a natural aquifer (as is the case for many western coal seams). Behind the gasification zone is the combustion zone that supplies the process heat. Heat is transferred from the combustion zone to the gasification zones primarily by convection of the product gases rather than by conduction through the solid char and coal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Jiang ◽  
Dengting Guo ◽  
Xiang Luo ◽  
Mengxia Xu ◽  
Tao Wu

Abstract This research is focused on the gasification performance of coal and its corresponding macerals as well as on the interactions among macerals under typical gasification conditions by Aspen Plus modeling. The synergistic coefficient was employed to show the degree of interactions, while the performance indicators including specific oxygen consumption (SOC), specific coal consumption (SCC), cold gas efficiency (CGE), and effective syngas (CO + H2) content were used to evaluate the gasification process. Sensitivity analyses showed that the parent coal and its macerals exhibited different gasification behaviors at the same operating conditions, such as the SOC and SCC decreased in the order of inertinite > vitrinite > liptinite, whereas CGE changed in the order of liptinite > vitrinite > inertinite. The synergistic coefficients of SOC and SCC for the simulated coals were in the range of 0.94–0.97, whereas the synergistic coefficient of CGE was 1.05–1.13. Moreover, it was found that synergistic coefficients of gasification indicators correlated well with maceral contents. In addition, the increase in temperature was found to promote the synergistic coefficients slightly, whilst at an oxygen to coal mass ratio of 0.8 and a steam to coal mass ratio of 0.8, the highest synergistic coefficient was obtained.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-52
Author(s):  
F. N Osuolale ◽  
K. A. Babatunde ◽  
O.O Agbede ◽  
A. F Olawuni ◽  
A.J Fatukasi ◽  
...  

Hydrogen has the potential to be a clean and sustainable alternative to fossil fuel especially if it is produced from renewable sources such as biomass. Gasification is the thermochemical conversion of biomass to a mixture of gases including hydrogen. The percentage yield of each constituent of the mixture is a function of some factors. This article highlights various parameters such as operating conditions; gasifier type; biomass type and composition; and gasification agents that influence the yield of hydrogen in the product gas. Economic evaluation of hydrogen from different sources was also presented. The hydrogen production from gasification process appears to be the most economic process amongst other hydrogen production processes considered. The process has the potential to be developed as an alternative to the conventional hydrogen production process.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tata Sutardi ◽  
Linwei Wang ◽  
Nader Karimi ◽  
Manosh C Paul

Abstract In this study, a packed bed reactor is developed to investigate the gasification process of coal particles. The effects of coal particle size and heater temperature of reactor are examined to identify the thermochemical processes through the packed bed. Three different coal samples with varying size, named as A, B, and C, are used, and the experimental results show that the packed bed with smaller coal size has higher temperature, reaching 624oC, 582oC, and 569oC for coal A, B, and C respectively. In the case of CO formation, the smaller particle size has greater products in the unit of mole fraction over the area of generation. However, the variation in the porosity of the packed bed due to different coal particle sizes affects the reactions through the oxygen access. Consequently, the CO formation is least from the coal packed bed formed by the smallest particle size A. A second test with the temperature variations shows that the higher heater temperature promotes the chemical reactions, resulting in the increased gas products. The findings indicate the important role of coal seam porosity in UCG (underground coal gasification) application, as well as temperature to promote the syngas productions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document