Developing New Environmental Regulations for the Australian Offshore Petroleum Industry

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham L. Cobby
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Regulations ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Offshore Petroleum

Offshore Vessels and Their Unique Applications for the Systems Designer

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (01) ◽  
pp. 43-76
Author(s):  
Paul R. Geiger ◽  
Calvin V. Norton
Keyword(s):  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
The Self ◽  
Surface Type ◽  
Distinct Category ◽  
Marine Engineer ◽  
Marine Engineering ◽  
Electrical Components ◽  
Marine Vessels ◽  
Jack Up ◽  
Offshore Petroleum

Offshore vessels are industrial vessels primarily utilized in the offshore petroleum industry for exploration or exploitation of subsea resources. The most common types of offshore vessels in use today are the column-stabilized semisubmersible unit, the self-elevating or jack-up unit, and surface-type units such as the drillship and barge. In the truest sense, whether they are operational afloat, as are the semisubmersible, drillship and barge, or operational while bottom supported, as is the jack-up, due to their mobility they are marine vessels with systems nominally the same as conventional ships. Due to their mission requirements, however, their systems have features that are unique when analyzed by the traditional marine engineer, and although these vessels contain mechanical and electrical components similar to those used in conventional ships, they serve different systems and have unique applications. This paper discusses the major marine engineering aspects of mobile offshore vessels that are unique and which have made them a distinct category of marine vessel.

Is Australia Prepared for the Decommissioning Challenge? A Regulator's Perspective

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Christensen ◽  
Andrew Re
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Regulatory Reform ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Independent Expert ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Petroleum

Abstract The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) is Australia's independent expert regulator for health and safety, structural (well) integrity and environmental management for all offshore oil and gas operations and greenhouse gas storage activities in Australian waters, and in coastal waters where regulatory powers and functions have been conferred. The Australian offshore petroleum industry has been in operation since the early 1960s and currently has approximately 57 platforms, 11 floating facilities, 3,500km of pipelines and 1000 wells in operation. Many offshore facilities are now approaching the end of their operational lives and it is estimated that over the next 50 years decommissioning of this infrastructure will cost more than US$40.5 billion. Decommissioning is a normal and inevitable stage in the lifetime of an offshore petroleum project that should be planned from the outset and matured throughout the life of operations. While only a few facilities have been decommissioned in Australian waters, most of Australia's offshore infrastructure is now more than 20 years old and entering a phase where they require extra attention and close maintenance prior to decommissioning. When the NOGA group of companies entered liquidation in 2020 and the Australian Government took control of decommissioning the Laminaria and Corallina field development it became evident that there were some fundamental gaps in relation to decommissioning in the Australian offshore petroleum industry. There are two key focus areas that require attention. Firstly, regulatory reform including policy change and modification to regulatory practice. Secondly, the development of visible and robust decommissioning plans by Industry titleholders. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance and benefit of adopting good practice when planning for decommissioning throughout the life cycle of a petroleum project. Whilst not insurmountable, the closing of these gaps will ensure that Australia is well placed to deal with the decommissioning challenge facing the industry in the next 50 years.

scholarly journals Proper Use of Technical Standards in Offshore Petroleum Industry

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Brkić ◽  
Pavel Praks
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
European Economic Area ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Technical Standards ◽  
The North ◽  
Offshore Petroleum

Ships for drilling need to operate in the territorial waters of many different countries which can have different technical standards and procedures. For example, the European Union and European Economic Area EU/EEA product safety directives exclude from their scope drilling ships and related equipment onboard. On the other hand, the EU/EEA offshore safety directive requires the application of all the best technical standards that are used worldwide in the oil and gas industry. Consequently, it is not easy to select the most appropriate technical standards that increase the overall level of safety and environmental protection whilst avoiding the costs of additional certifications. We will show how some technical standards and procedures, which are recognized worldwide by the petroleum industry, can be accepted by various standardization bodies, and how they can fulfil the essential health and safety requirements of certain directives. Emphasis will be placed on the prevention of fire and explosion, on the safe use of equipment under pressure, and on the protection of personnel who work with machinery. Additionally considered is how the proper use of adequate procedures available at the time would have prevented three large scale offshore petroleum accidents: the Macondo Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010; the Montara in the Timor Sea in 2009; the Piper Alpha in the North Sea in 1988.

Floating-Roof Tanks: Design and Operation in the Petroleum Industry

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry A. Gallagher ◽  
Christian R. Desjardins
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle Cost ◽  
Environmental Regulations ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Petroleum Products ◽  
Combined Loads ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Operating Limits ◽  
Present Design ◽  
High Vapor

The floating-roof tank has been the most widely used method of storage of volatile petroleum products since the first demonstration b Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (CB&I) in 1923. There have been many changes and design improvements to that first pan-style-floating roof. A floating roof is a complex structure. It must be designed to remain buoyant even when exposed to combined loads from varying process, weather and product conditions. There is a continued demand for improved floating-roof tanks to store a wide range of petroleum and petrochemical products in compliance with state and federal environmental regulations. Floating roofs are used in open top tanks (EFRT), inside tanks with fixed roofs (IFRT), or in tanks that are totally closed where no product evaporative losses are permitted for release to the atmosphere. This very special type of installation is referred to as a zero emission storage tank (ZEST). Products that might have been stored in basic fixed roof tanks must now utilize a floating roof to limit evaporative emissions to the atmosphere. High vapor pressure condensate service and blended heavy crude oils also present new design challenges to the floating roof tank industry. This paper will review the most prominent styles of floating roofs from 1923 to the present. Design and operating limits for current da floating-roof structures are presented. New trends in environmental regulations and the potential impact on the design and operation of floating-roof tanks will be presented. Current maintenance practices and the effect on Life Cycle Cost Management of the storage syste are also reviewed.

Carbon capture and storage—deelopments in Australia

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Stuart Barrymore ◽  
Ann-Maree Mathison
Keyword(s):  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Marine Pollution ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Gas Storage ◽  
Commercial Scale ◽  
Public And Private Sector ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Offshore Petroleum

Legal and non-legal developments in the carbon capture and storage (CCS) arena continue to gain momentum in Australia. On 22 November 2008 the Offshore Petroleum Amendment (Greenhouse Gas Storage) Act 2008 (Cth) (GGS Amendments) came into force. The GGS Amendments follow the amendment in February 2007 of the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter 1972 and 1996 Protocol Thereto (London Protocol) which allows the storage of carbon dioxide under the seabed. The GGS Amendments amend the Offshore Petroleum Act 2006 (Cth) (OPA), which has now been renamed the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006 (Cth) (Act), to establish a system of offshore titles that authorises the transportation, injection and storage of greenhouse gas (GHG) substances in geological formations under the seabed and manage the inevitable interaction with the offshore petroleum industry. In addition, the States of Queensland and Victoria have now enacted onshore CCS legislation. In September 2008, the Federal Government announced $100 million in funding for an Australian Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute (AGCCSI), which will be an international hub for co-ordinating public and private sector funding of CCS research projects and will provide international policy and management oversight. The AGCCSI was formally launched on 16 April 2009. The goal of the AGCCSI is to deliver at least 20 commercial scale CCS plants around the world by 2020. There are numerous examples in Australia and internationally of CCS pilot projects underway with the goal of deploying CCS on a commercial scale. The Callide Oxyfuel Project in Central Queensland that began construction recently will retrofit an existing coal fired power station with a CCS facility, with plans for the oxyfuel boiler to be operational in the Callide A power plant by 2011.

SAFETY IN THE OFFSHORE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY: THE NEW REGIME

1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Glenn Jordan
Keyword(s):  
Quality Management ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Quality Management System ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Work Place ◽  
System Control ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Safety Case ◽  
Safety Cases ◽  
Offshore Petroleum

Following the recommendations of the UK Cullen and COSOP reports, a new regulatory and operational safety regime is being introduced across Australian territorial waters for the offshore petroleum industry. This paper details the concepts behind the new regime including the development and implementation strategies employed to introduce it and the implications to industry and government instrumentalities. The recognition that safety in the work place is an outcome of managerial commitment and a function of work system control is resulting in legislative reforms that will reduce the focus on physical compliance, in favour of a goal-setting legislative approach that places emphasis on systems of managing safety at the work place. By focussing upon ends rather than means, objective based regulation requires organisations to manage the design, construction and operation of facilities to reduce risk to a 'reasonably practicable level*. The details of the management arrangements and risk assessment studies once submitted in a 'safety case' and acknowledged by the regulator, form a co-regulatory guidance document that sets both the standards to be achieved and the mechanism for achieving them. Auditing of the operator against an accepted safety case will occur on a regular basis. Driven by measurement of an operator's safety performance, selected systems will be targeted and audited against the safety case by a team of auditors composed of both government inspectors and operator personnel. Performance measures will be both proactive and reactive in nature and include among other measures, results obtained through the newly created national data base for incidents and accidents. Preparation and assessment of safety cases provides regulators and operators alike with difficulties. Consistency of assessment and objective determination that acceptable minimum standards have been met provide a challenge to government agencies and to the petroleum industry. Recognition of the nature of this challenge has led to the adoption of Quality Management principles among government utilities. A key feature of the Quality Management System will be the introduction of systems that drive change through cyclic updates of the safety case assessment procedures.The safety case concept institutionalises a dialogue between regulator and operator that will facilitate the preparation, submission and assessment of the safety case. This initiative provides for a staged submission process to correspond to the development phase of the facility. It is considered that this methodology will ensure minimal delays in assessment and provide certainty in the business planning process. The new safety case regime provides for a greater level of employee participation both in the preparation of safety cases and the maintenance of safety at the work place. Transparency of approach by both operators and regulators will be needed if public and workforce confidence are to be maintained. Co-operation and continual improvement will hopefully be the hall mark of the Australian safety case regime.

2013 offshore petroleum exploration acreage release

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Tania Constable
Keyword(s):  
Capital Expenditure ◽  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Production Capacity ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Production Models ◽  
Investment Opportunities ◽  
Trading Partners ◽  
Under Construction ◽  
Offshore Petroleum

Exploration is essential for the future of Australia’s resources sector, to enhance our international competitiveness and ensure the long-term growth of this important industry while maintaining Australian energy security and that of our major energy trading partners. Encouraging investment in offshore petroleum exploration is facilitated though the annual Offshore Petroleum Exploration Acreage Release prepared in collaboration between the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism, and Geoscience Australia. The annual release is underpinned by a stable economic environment, and a regulatory framework that provides the industry with a variety of investment opportunities. Australia has abundant natural gas reserves and is experiencing a rapid expansion of its LNG production capacity. Today, Australia is the world’s fourth-largest exporter of LNG, with a total export capacity of 24.3 million tonnes per annum from its three operational projects. Capacity will further increase to around 80 million tonnes per annum in 2017 once the seven projects presently under construction come online. These projects represent more than US$175 billion in capital expenditure announced since mid-2007, and result in Australia becoming the only country to use three LNG production models: conventional offshore gas with onshore LNG production; FLNG production; and, CSG-based LNG production. This paper will provide detail about the acreage included in the 2013 Offshore Petroleum Exploration Acreage Release. Areas are carefully selected to offer the global petroleum industry a variety of investment opportunities. This paper will also discuss the supporting regulatory environment and new government initiatives, including the introduction of a five-year exploration strategy for acreage release and the introduction of a cash bidding system as part of future offshore petroleum acreage releases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document