Measurement of Coal Cleat Porosity and Relative Permeability Characteristics

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Purl ◽  
J.C. Evanoff ◽  
M.L. Brugler
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Permeability Characteristics ◽  
Cleat Porosity

scholarly journals Relative Permeability Characteristics During Carbon Capture and Sequestration Process in Low-Permeable Reservoirs

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 990
Author(s):  
Mingxing Bai ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
Chengli Li ◽  
Kaoping Song
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Co2 Flooding ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Permeability Characteristics ◽  
Gas Recovery ◽  
Miscible Flooding ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

The injection of carbon dioxide (CO2) in low-permeable reservoirs can not only mitigate the greenhouse effect on the environment, but also enhance oil and gas recovery (EOR). For numerical simulation work of this process, relative permeability can help predict the capacity for the flow of CO2 throughout the life of the reservoir, and reflect the changes induced by the injected CO2. In this paper, the experimental methods and empirical correlations to determine relative permeability are reviewed and discussed. Specifically, for a low-permeable reservoir in China, a core displacement experiment is performed for both natural and artificial low-permeable cores to study the relative permeability characteristics. The results show that for immiscible CO2 flooding, when considering the threshold pressure and gas slippage, the relative permeability decreases to some extent, and the relative permeability of oil/water does not reduce as much as that of CO2. In miscible flooding, the curves have different shapes for cores with a different permeability. By comparing the relative permeability curves under immiscible and miscible CO2 flooding, it is found that the two-phase span of miscible flooding is wider, and the relative permeability at the gas endpoint becomes larger.

An Imbibition Model - Its Application to Flow Behavior and the Prediction of Oil Recovery

1961 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Naar ◽  
J.H. Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Porous Medium ◽  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Pore Geometry ◽  
Mathematical Treatment ◽  
Complete Wetting ◽  
Permeability Characteristics ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves ◽  
Wetting Fluid

Introduction The displacement of a wetting fluid from a porous medium by a non-wetting fluid (drainage) is now reasonably well understood. A complete explanation has yet to be found for the analogous case of a wetting fluid being spontaneously imbibed and the non-wetting phase displaced (imbibition). During the displacement of oil or gas by water in a water-wet sand, the porous medium ordinarily imbibes water. The amount of oil recovered, the cost of recovery and the production history seem then to be controlled mainly by pore geometry. The influence of pore geometry is reflected in drainage and imbibition capillary-pressure curves and relative permeability curves. Relative permeability curves for a particular consolidated sand show that at any given saturation the permeability to oil during imbibition is smaller than during drainage. Low imbibition permeabilities suggest that the non-wetting phase, oil or gas, is gradually trapped by the advancing water. This paper describes a mathematical image (model) of consolidated porous rock based on the concept of the trapping of the non-wetting phase during the imbibition process. The following items have been derived from the model.A direct relation between the relative permeability characteristics during imbibition and those observed during drainage.A theoretical limit for the fractional amount of oil or gas recoverable by imbibition.An expression for the resistivity index which can be used in connection with the formula for wetting-phase relative permeability to check the consistency of the model.The limits of flow performance for a given rock dictated by complete wetting by either oil or water.The factors controlling oil recovery by imbibition in the presence of free gas. The complexity of a porous medium is such that drastic simplifications must be introduced to obtain a model amenable to mathematical treatment. Many parameters have been introduced by others in "progressing" from the parallel-capillary model to the randomly interconnected capillary models independently proposed by Wyllie and Gardner and Marshall. To these a further complication must be added since an imbibition model must trap part of the non-wetting phase during imbibition of the wetting phase. Like so many of the previously introduced complications, this fluid-block was introduced to make the model performance fit the observed imbibition flow behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document