Relative Permeability Characteristics of Vugular Cores - Their Measurement and Significance

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Ehrlich
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Permeability Characteristics

scholarly journals Relative Permeability Characteristics During Carbon Capture and Sequestration Process in Low-Permeable Reservoirs

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 990
Author(s):  
Mingxing Bai ◽  
Lu Liu ◽  
Chengli Li ◽  
Kaoping Song
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Co2 Flooding ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Permeability Characteristics ◽  
Gas Recovery ◽  
Miscible Flooding ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

The injection of carbon dioxide (CO2) in low-permeable reservoirs can not only mitigate the greenhouse effect on the environment, but also enhance oil and gas recovery (EOR). For numerical simulation work of this process, relative permeability can help predict the capacity for the flow of CO2 throughout the life of the reservoir, and reflect the changes induced by the injected CO2. In this paper, the experimental methods and empirical correlations to determine relative permeability are reviewed and discussed. Specifically, for a low-permeable reservoir in China, a core displacement experiment is performed for both natural and artificial low-permeable cores to study the relative permeability characteristics. The results show that for immiscible CO2 flooding, when considering the threshold pressure and gas slippage, the relative permeability decreases to some extent, and the relative permeability of oil/water does not reduce as much as that of CO2. In miscible flooding, the curves have different shapes for cores with a different permeability. By comparing the relative permeability curves under immiscible and miscible CO2 flooding, it is found that the two-phase span of miscible flooding is wider, and the relative permeability at the gas endpoint becomes larger.

An Imbibition Model - Its Application to Flow Behavior and the Prediction of Oil Recovery

1961 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Naar ◽  
J.H. Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Porous Medium ◽  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Pore Geometry ◽  
Mathematical Treatment ◽  
Complete Wetting ◽  
Permeability Characteristics ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves ◽  
Wetting Fluid

Introduction The displacement of a wetting fluid from a porous medium by a non-wetting fluid (drainage) is now reasonably well understood. A complete explanation has yet to be found for the analogous case of a wetting fluid being spontaneously imbibed and the non-wetting phase displaced (imbibition). During the displacement of oil or gas by water in a water-wet sand, the porous medium ordinarily imbibes water. The amount of oil recovered, the cost of recovery and the production history seem then to be controlled mainly by pore geometry. The influence of pore geometry is reflected in drainage and imbibition capillary-pressure curves and relative permeability curves. Relative permeability curves for a particular consolidated sand show that at any given saturation the permeability to oil during imbibition is smaller than during drainage. Low imbibition permeabilities suggest that the non-wetting phase, oil or gas, is gradually trapped by the advancing water. This paper describes a mathematical image (model) of consolidated porous rock based on the concept of the trapping of the non-wetting phase during the imbibition process. The following items have been derived from the model.A direct relation between the relative permeability characteristics during imbibition and those observed during drainage.A theoretical limit for the fractional amount of oil or gas recoverable by imbibition.An expression for the resistivity index which can be used in connection with the formula for wetting-phase relative permeability to check the consistency of the model.The limits of flow performance for a given rock dictated by complete wetting by either oil or water.The factors controlling oil recovery by imbibition in the presence of free gas. The complexity of a porous medium is such that drastic simplifications must be introduced to obtain a model amenable to mathematical treatment. Many parameters have been introduced by others in "progressing" from the parallel-capillary model to the randomly interconnected capillary models independently proposed by Wyllie and Gardner and Marshall. To these a further complication must be added since an imbibition model must trap part of the non-wetting phase during imbibition of the wetting phase. Like so many of the previously introduced complications, this fluid-block was introduced to make the model performance fit the observed imbibition flow behavior.

Sandstone and Carbonate Two- and Three-Phase Relative Permeability Characteristics

1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.N. Schneider ◽  
W.W. Owens
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Phase System ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Permeability Characteristics ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Three Phase Flow

Abstract Three-phase relative permeability characteristics applicable to various oil displacement processes in the reservoir such as combustion and alternate gas-water injection were determined on both outcrop and reservoir core samples. Steady-state and nonsteady-state tests were performed on a variety of sandstone and carbonate core samples having different wetting properties. Some of the tests were performed on preserved samples. Some of the three-phase tests were performed on samples that contained two flowing phases and a third nonflowing phase, either gas or oil. These were classed as three-phase flow tests because the third phase played an important role in the flow behavior which was determined. The three-phase relative permeability test results are directly compared with the results of two-phase gas-oil and water-oil test. Wetting-phase relative permeability was found to be primarily dependent on its own saturation, i.e., relative permeability to the wetting phase during three-phase flow was in agreement with and could be predicted from the tow-phase data. Nonwetting-phase relative permeability-saturation relationships were found to be more complex and to depend in some cases on the saturation history of both nonwetting phases and on the saturation ratio of the second nonwetting phase and the wetting phases. Trapping of a given nonwetting phase or mutual flow interference between the two nonwetting phases when both are flowing accounts for most of the low relative permeabilities observed for three-phase flow tests. However, in special cases nonwetting-phase relative permeabilities at a given saturation are higher than those given by two-phase flow data. Despite these complexities some types of three-phase flow behavior can be predicted from two-phase flow data. Through its effect on the spatial distribution of the phases, wettability is shown to be a controlling factor in determining three-phase relative permeability characteristics. however, despite the importance of wettability the present data shown that for both water-wet and oil-wet systems oil recovery can be improved by several different injection processes, but the additional oil recovery is accompanied by lower fluid mobility. Introduction The increasing emphasis on optimizing recovery and the rapid and extensive development and use of mathematical modes for predicting reservoir performance are together creating a widespread need for reliable basic data on rock flow behavior. The two-phase imbibition or drainage flow relationships common to conventional oil recovery processes (depletion, gas or water injection, gravity drainage) are not applicable to some of the newer secondary and tertiary recovery techniques. This is because the reservoir displacement process may differ from that easily simulated in laboratory relative permeability studies. in some situations, data are needed fro a three-phase system where almost any combination of two fluids or even all three fluids may be flowing. In other, however, only two flowing phases are present, but the saturation history of the system is unique. Leverett and Lewis were the first to collect experimental relative permeability data on a three-phase system. Corey et al. were similarly leaders in efforts to define three-phase flow relationships using empirical approaches. Space does not permit a critical review of these earlier works. For those interested, a recent article by Saraf and Fatt provides a brief discussion of the experimental techniques used by earlier investigators. Suffice it to say that both experimental and empirical approaches have been used, but the applicability of both has been limited because in only one case have three-phase relative permeability data been obtained on reservoir rock material. SPEJ P. 75ˆ

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document