Measurement of Non-Equilibrium Solvent Release from Heavy Oil during Pressure Depletion

Author(s):  
J. Bryan ◽  
J. Butron ◽  
E. Nickel ◽  
A. Kantzas
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine Shivani Medina ◽  
Iomi Dhanielle Medina ◽  
Gao Zhang

Abstract The phenomenon of higher than expected production rates and recovery factors in heavy oil reservoirs captured the term "foamy oil," by researchers. This is mainly due to the bubble filled chocolate mousse appearance found at wellheads where this phenomenon occurs. Foamy oil flow is barely understood up to this day. Understanding why this unusual occurrence exists can aid in the transfer of principles to low recovery heavy oil reservoirs globally. This study focused mainly on how varying the viscosity and temperature via pressure depletion lab tests affected the performance of foamy oil production. Six different lab-scaled experiments were conducted, four with varying temperatures and two with varying viscosities. All experiments were conducted using lab-scaled sand pack pressure depletion tests with the same initial gas oil ratio (GOR). The first series of experiments with varying temperatures showed that the oil recovery was inversely proportional to elevated temperatures, however there was a directly proportional relationship between gas recovery and elevation in temperature. A unique observation was also made, during late-stage production, foamy oil recovery reappeared with temperatures in the 45-55°C range. With respect to the viscosities, a non-linear relationship existed, however there was an optimal region in which the live-oil viscosity and foamy oil production seem to be harmonious.


Fuel ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 241 ◽  
pp. 813-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al-Gawfi ◽  
Hossein Nourozieh ◽  
Ehsan Ranjbar ◽  
Hassan Hassanzadeh ◽  
Jalal Abedi

Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 117648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyang Wang ◽  
Farshid Torabi ◽  
Fanhua Zeng ◽  
Huiwen Xiao

1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C.K. Wong ◽  
F. Guo ◽  
J.S. Weaver ◽  
W.E. Barr

Fuel ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 12-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Javad Paitakhti Oskouei ◽  
Amin Badamchi Zadeh ◽  
Ian D. Gates

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Maria Plata ◽  
Jonathan Bryan ◽  
Apostolos Kantzas

Summary The cyclic solvent injection (CSI) process has recently shown to be a promising method for enhanced heavy oil recovery in Canada. Laboratory testing is often run before development of field pilots to assess the effect of parameters, such as solvent choice and process conditions, on the CSI response. However, differences between laboratory results vs. field applications have been observed. CSI laboratory studies work for only two to three cycles due to low incremental oil in subsequent cycles, whereas field pilots continue for years over multiple cycles. This experimental study is intended to capture the production mechanisms responsible for heavy oil production in CSI. Primary production and CSI tests were conducted using sandpack models saturated with live heavy oil of 9530 mPa·s viscosity. The experiments were conducted in horizontal and vertical mode injection at high- and low-pressure depletion rates using two solvent mixtures of CH4 and C3H8. The sandpacks were scanned after every cycle to analyze the evolution of gas and oil saturations using computed tomography (CT). Three cores were used to study the effect of several parameters: gravity forces, pressure depletion rate, solvent composition, and initial oil saturation on the performance of CSI processes. CSI cycles run after primary production in horizontal systems produced negligible incremental oil for both slow and fast drawdown rates due to the large void space and high free gas saturation inhibiting the pressure buildup to push the solvent-diluted oil. These CSI experiments were only initially successful in dead oil systems, in which the initial oil saturation was higher and appropriate pressure gradient was generated through fast depletion rates. During the vertical alignment, CSI cycles exhibited higher incremental oil recovery per cycle. Slow depletion cycles were more efficient in terms of pressure and incremental recovery per cycle; however, faster depletion cycles performed better as a function of time. These results are more in line with the repeated recoveries measured over multiple cycles in field CSI pilot studies. More volume of diluted oil was drained out of the core when the solvent mixture with higher propane (C3H8) content was injected. These results demonstrate the importance of gravity drainage in the CSI process and its significance on successful oil recovery rates. This study illustrates the limitations of previous horizontal laboratory tests and shows an improved test configuration for modeling and prediction of the improved response observed in CSI pilots.


Fuel ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 210-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Zhou ◽  
Fanhua Zeng ◽  
Liehui Zhang ◽  
Hongyang Wang

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khan Sameem Athar ◽  
Mahmood Reza Yassin ◽  
Hassan Dehghanpour

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document