Well Performance Improvement Using Complex Nano Fluids

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanof Mohamed Kutty ◽  
Myrat Kuliyev ◽  
Mohamed Abdelsalam Hussein ◽  
Sunil Chitre ◽  
Hammad Mustafa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1079 (7) ◽  
pp. 072037
Author(s):  
K F Gabdrakhmanova ◽  
G R Izmailova ◽  
L Z Samigullina

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-243
Author(s):  
T. Sathish

Base fluids like water, ethylene glycolandengineoilare conventionally used as a heat transfer medium. The performance of heat transferred is improved in the conventional fluids with the addition of Nano particles. Hence, this paper considers the forced conventional flow problem over the base fluid within a uniform heated tube placed on a wall. The analysis of heattransferco-efficientis done through a constant Reynoldsnumberfor both Nano and base fluid with a simulation tool. Further, a comparative analysis is carried out with heat transfer coefficient over the base and various Nano fluids. It is seen that the Nano fluids has a better performance due to its better thermal characteristics under standard conditions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Ahmed Abdulla Salem Alsaeedi ◽  
Fahed Ahmed AlHarethi ◽  
Manar Maher Mohamed Elabrashy ◽  
Shemaisa Ahmed Abdalla Mohamad Alsenaidi ◽  
Nagaraju Reddicharla ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-324
Author(s):  
Syukrani Kadir

periodically in preparing learning plans, implementing learning, assessing learning achievement, carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement that can improve teacher performance. This performance improvement is through periodic collaborative educational supervision. Based on the results of educational supervision in cycle I and cycle II, teacher performance increased, namely in cycle I, teacher performance in preparing learning plans in cycle I reached 71.98%, while cycle II was 92.44%. Teacher performance in implementing learning cycle I reached 72.44% while cycle II reached 93.81%. Teacher performance in assessing learning achievement in cycle Im reached 81.30% while cycle II was 90.56%. Teacher performance in carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement in the first cycle reached 59.76% while the second cycle was 83.00%. Thus, the average action cycle II was above 75.00%. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the teacher's performance has increased in preparing learning plans, implementing learning, assessing learning achievement, carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document