Improving Oil and Gas Well Performance With Modular Facilities Design

Author(s):  
M. Halker
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Islamov ◽  
Eghbal Motaei ◽  
Bahrom Madon ◽  
Khairul Azhar Abu Bakar ◽  
Victor Hamdan ◽  
...  

Abstract Dynamic Well Operating Envelop (WOE) allows to ensure that well is maintained and operated within design limits and operated in the safe, stable and profitable way. WOE covers the Well Integrity, Reservoir constraints and Facility limitations and visualizes them on well performance chart (Hamzat et al., 2013). Design and operating limits (such as upper and lower completion/facilities design pressures, sand failure, erosion limitations, reservoir management related limitations etc) are identified and translated into two-dimensional WOE (pressure vs. flowrate) to ensure maximum range of operating conditions that represents safe and reliable operation are covered. VLP/IPR performance curves were incorporated based on latest Validated Well Model. Optimum well operating window represents the maximum range of operating conditions within the Reservoir constraints assessed. By introducing actual Well Performance data the optimisation opportunities such as production/injection enhancement identified. During generating the Well Operating Envelops tremendous work being done to rectify challenges such as: most static data (i.e. design and reservoir limitations) are not digitized, unreliable real-time/dynamic data flow (i.e. FTHP, Oil/Gas rates etc), disintegrated and unreliable well Models and no solid workflows for Flow assurance. As a pre-requisite the workflows being developed to make data tidy i.e.ready and right, and Well Model inputs being integrated to build updated Well Models. Successful WOE prototype is generated for natural and artificially lifted Oil and Gas wells. Optimisation opportunities being identified (i.e. flowline pressure reduction, reservoir stimulation and bean-up) Proactive maintenance is made possible through dynamic WOE as a real time exceptional based surveillance (EBS) tool which is allowing Asset engineers to conduct the well performance monitoring, and maintain it within safe, stable and profitable window. Additionally, it allows to track all Production Enhancement jobs and seamless forecasting for new opportunities.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B. Smith ◽  
A. Bale ◽  
L.K. Britt ◽  
L.E. Cunningham ◽  
J.R. Jones ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M.A. Magomedgadzhieva ◽  
◽  
G.S. Oganov ◽  
I.B. Mitrofanov ◽  
A.M. Karpov ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1064 (1) ◽  
pp. 012059
Author(s):  
R R Gazizov ◽  
A P Chizhov ◽  
V E Andreev ◽  
A V Chibisov ◽  
V V Mukhametshin ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 423-426 ◽  
pp. 2035-2039
Author(s):  
Long Cang Huang ◽  
Yin Ping Cao ◽  
Yang Yu ◽  
Yi Hua Dou

In the process of oil and gas well production, tubing connection stand the axial alternating load during open well, shut well and fluid flow. In order to know premium connection seal ability under the loading, two types of P110 88.9mmx6.45mm premium tubing connections which called A connection and B connection are performed with finite element analysis, in which contact pressures and their the regularities distribution on sealing surface are analyzed. The results show that with the increasing of cycle number, the maximum contact pressures on sealing surface of both A connection and B connection are decreased. The decreasing of the maximum contact pressures on B connection is greater than those on A connection. With the increasing of cycle number of axial alternating compression load, the maximum contact pressure on sealing surface of A connection is decreased, and the maximum contact pressure on sealing surface of B connection remains constant. Compared the result, it shows that the seal ability of A connection is better than B connection under axial alternating tension load, while the seal ability of B connection is better than type A connection under axial alternating compression load.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document