Complexities Associated with Thermal Stimulation of Low Gravity Oil Sand Using Horizontal Wells

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Qi ◽  
Q. Zhang ◽  
I. Ershaghi
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Thermal Stimulation ◽  
Oil Sand ◽  
Low Gravity ◽  
Stimulation Of

Non-Thermal Stimulation of Three-Level Impurities by Phonons

1976 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 507-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Michel ◽  
M. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Optical and Thermal Stimulation of Reactions in α-A12O3 Containing V3+, V4+, Co3+, and Co2+

1980 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 377-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Delbecq ◽  
S. A. Marshall ◽  
P. H. Yuster
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Stimulation Of Horizontal Wells Using Diverted Acid Treatments

10.2118/93-20 ◽  
1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelvin Williamson ◽  
Chad Randal ◽  
Joe Stadlwieser ◽  
Frank O'Neill
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Stimulation Of ◽  
Acid Treatments

Convergence of heterotopic nociceptive information onto neurons of caudal medullary reticular formation in monkey (Macaca fascicularis)

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1118-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Villanueva ◽  
K. D. Cliffer ◽  
L. S. Sorkin ◽  
D. Le Bars ◽  
W. D. Willis
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Background Activity ◽  
The Body ◽  
Thermal Stimulation ◽  
Medullary Reticular Formation ◽  
Nociceptive Information ◽  
Noxious Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Recordings were made in anesthetized monkeys from neurons in the medullary reticular formation (MRF) caudal to the obex. Responses of 19 MRF neurons to mechanical, thermal, and/or electrical stimulation were examined. MRF neurons exhibited convergence of nociceptive cutaneous inputs from widespread areas of the body and face. 2. MRF neurons exhibited low levels of background activity. Background activity increased after periods of intense cutaneous mechanical or thermal stimulation. Nearly all MRF neurons tested failed to respond to heterosensory stimuli (flashes, whistle sounds), and none responded to joint movements. 3. MRF neurons were excited by and encoded the intensity of noxious mechanical stimulation. Responses to stimuli on contralateral limbs were greater than those to stimuli on ipsilateral limbs. Responses were greater to stimuli on the forelimbs than to stimuli on the hindlimbs. 4. MRF neurons responded to noxious thermal stimulation (51 degrees C) of widespread areas of the body. Mean responses from stimulation at different locations were generally parallel to those for noxious mechanical stimulation. Responses increased with intensity of noxious thermal stimulation (45-50 degrees C). 5. MRF neurons responded with one or two peaks of activation to percutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the limbs, the face, or the tail. The differences in latency of responses to stimulating two locations along the tail suggested that activity was elicited by activation of peripheral fibers with a mean conduction velocity in the A delta range. Stimulation of the contralateral hindlimb elicited greater responses, with lower thresholds and shorter latencies, than did stimulation of the ipsilateral hindlimb. 6. Electrophysiological properties of monkey MRF neurons resembled those of neurons in the medullary subnucleus reticularis dorsalis (SRD) in the rat. Neurons in the caudal medullary reticular formation could play a role in processing nociceptive information. Convergence of nociceptive cutaneous input from widespread areas of the body suggests that MRF neurons may contribute to autonomic, affective, attentional, and/or sensory-motor processes related to pain.

The Effect of Well Azimuth or Don't Let Your Landman Plan Your Well Path!

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen Yang ◽  
Larry K. Britt ◽  
Shari Dunn-Norman
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Well ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Well Performance ◽  
Gas Reservoirs ◽  
Principal Stresses ◽  
Lateral Direction ◽  
Well Completion ◽  
Stimulation Of

Abstract Since the late 1980's when Maersk published their work on multiple fracturing of horizontal wells in the Dan Field, the use of transverse multiple fractured horizontal wells has become the completion of choice and become the “industry standard” for unconventional and tight oil and tight gas reservoirs. Today approximately sixty percent of all wells drilled in the United States are drilled horizontally and nearly all of them are multiple fractured. Because a horizontal well adds additional cost and complexity to the drilling, completion, and stimulation of the well we need to fully understand anything that affects the cost and complexity. In other words, we need to understand the affects of the principal stresses, both direction and magnitude, on the drilling completion, and stimulation of these wells. However, little work has been done to address and understand the relationship between the principal stresses and the lateral direction. This paper has as its goal to fundamentally address the question, in what direction should I drill my lateral? Do I drill it in the direction of the maximum horizontal stress (longitudinal) or do I drill it in the direction of the minimum horizontal stress (transverse)? The answer to this question relates directly back to the title of this paper and please "Don't let your land man drive that decision." This paper focuses on the horizontal well's lateral direction (longitudinal or transverse fracture orientation) and how that direction influences productivity, reserves, and economics of horizontal wells. Optimization studies using a single phase fully three dimensional numeric simulator including convergent non-Darcy flow were used to highlight the importance of lateral direction as a function of reservoir permeability. These studies, conducted for both oil and gas, are used to identify the point on the permeability continuum where longitudinal wells outperform transverse wells. The simulations compare and contrast the transverse multiple fractured horizontal well to longitudinal wells based on the number of fractures and stages. Further, the effects of lateral length, fracture half-length, and fracture conductivity were investigated to see how these parameters affected the decision over lateral direction in both oil and gas reservoirs. Additionally, how does completion style affect the lateral direction? That is, how does an open hole completion compare to a cased hole completion and should the type of completion affect the decision on in what direction the lateral should be drilled? These simulation results will be used to discuss the various horizontal well completion and stimulation metrics (rate, recovery, and economics) and how the choice of metrics affects the choice of lateral direction. This paper will also show a series of field case studies to illustrate actual field comparisons in both oil and gas reservoirs of longitudinal versus transverse horizontal wells and tie these field examples and results to the numeric simulation study. This work benefits the petroleum industry by: Establishing well performance and economic based criteria as a function of permeability for drilling longitudinal or transverse horizontal wells,Integrating the reservoir objectives and geomechanic limitations into a horizontal well completion and stimulation strategy,Developing well performance and economic objectives for horizontal well direction (transverse versus longitudinal) and highlighting the incremental benefits of various completion and stimulation strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document