Technical Evaluation of Secondary Oil Recovery Methods, A Case Study on One of the Iranian HPHT Carbonate Reservoirs

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sajjadian ◽  
V. Mahmoudian Ataabadi ◽  
M. Dalaei
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Carbonate Reservoirs ◽  
Technical Evaluation ◽  
Secondary Oil Recovery ◽  
Recovery Methods

Laboratory Study of Alkyl Ether Sulfonates for Improved Oil Recovery in High-Salinity Carbonate Reservoirs: A Case Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 3655-3660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Aoudia ◽  
Rashid S. Al-Maamari ◽  
Moein Nabipour ◽  
Ali S. Al-Bemani ◽  
Shahab Ayatollahi
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Study ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Carbonate Reservoirs ◽  
Alkyl Ether ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery

Preculaatities of evaluation of the effectiveness of flow deflection technologies

2018 ◽  
pp. 93-101
Author(s):  
A. A. Kazakov ◽  
V. V. Chelepov ◽  
R. G. Ramazanov
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Production Well ◽  
Oil Companies ◽  
Efficiency Calculation ◽  
Petroleum Companies ◽  
Flow Deflection ◽  
Recovery Methods

The features of evaluation of the effectiveness of flow deflection technologies of enhanced oil recovery methods. It is shown that the effect of zeroing component intensification of fluid withdrawal leads to an overestimation of the effect of flow deflection technology (PRP). Used in oil companies practice PRP efficiency calculation, which consists in calculating the effect on each production well responsive to subsequent summation effects, leads to the selective taking into account only the positive components of PRP effect. Negative constituents — not taken into account and it brings overestimate over to overstating of efficiency. On actual examples the groundless overstating and understating of efficiency is shown overestimate at calculations on applied in petroleum companies by a calculation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document