Asphaltene Precipitation Behavior during Gas Injection in a UAE Carbonate Reservoir and a Faster Experimental Strategy to Predict Asphaltene Onset Pressure

Author(s):  
Yu Zhou ◽  
Hemanta Kumar Sarma
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Zharko ◽  
Dmitriy Burdakov

Abstract The paper presents the results of a pilot project implementing WAG injection at the oilfield with carbonate reservoir, characterized by low efficiency of traditional waterflooding. The objective of the pilot project was to evaluate the efficiency of this enhanced oil recovery method for conditions of the specific oil field. For the initial introduction of WAG, an area of the reservoir with minimal potential risks has been identified. During the test injections of water and gas, production parameters were monitored, including the oil production rates of the reacting wells and the water and gas injection rates of injection wells, the change in the density and composition of the produced fluids. With first positive results, the pilot area of the reservoir was expanded. In accordance with the responses of the producing wells to the injection of displacing agents, the injection rates were adjusted, and the production intensified, with the aim of maximizing the effect of WAG. The results obtained in practice were reproduced in the simulation model sector in order to obtain a project curve characterizing an increase in oil recovery due to water-alternating gas injection. Practical results obtained during pilot testing of the technology show that the injection of gas and water alternately can reduce the water cut of the reacting wells and increase overall oil production, providing more efficient displacement compared to traditional waterflooding. The use of WAG after the waterflooding provides an increase in oil recovery and a decrease in residual oil saturation. The water cut of the produced liquid decreased from 98% to 80%, an increase in oil production rate of 100 tons/day was obtained. The increase in the oil recovery factor is estimated at approximately 7.5% at gas injection of 1.5 hydrocarbon pore volumes. Based on the received results, the displacement characteristic was constructed. Methods for monitoring the effectiveness of WAG have been determined, and studies are planned to be carried out when designing a full-scale WAG project at the field. This project is the first pilot project in Russia implementing WAG injection in a field with a carbonate reservoir. During the pilot project, the technical feasibility of implementing this EOR method was confirmed, as well as its efficiency in terms of increasing the oil recovery factor for the conditions of the carbonate reservoir of Eastern Siberia, characterized by high water cut and low values of oil displacement coefficients during waterflooding.


SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
M. R. Fassihi ◽  
E. Turek ◽  
M. Matt Honarpour ◽  
D. Peck ◽  
R. Fyfe

Summary As part of studying miscible gas injection (GI) in a major field within the Green Canyon protraction area in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM), asphaltene-formation risk was identified as a key factor affecting a potential GI project. The industry has not conducted many experiments to quantify the effect of asphaltenes on reservoir and well performance under GI conditions. In this paper we discuss a novel laboratory test for evaluating the asphaltene effect on permeability. The goals of the study were to define the asphaltene-precipitation envelope using blends of reservoir fluid and injection gas, and measure permeability reduction caused by asphaltene precipitation in a core under GI. To properly analyze the effect of GI, a suite of fluid-characterization studies was conducted, including restored-oil samples, compositional analysis, constant composition expansion (CCE), and differential vaporization. Miscibility conditions were defined through slimtube-displacement tests. Gas solubility was determined through swelling tests complemented by asphaltene-onset-pressure (AOP) testing. The unique procedure was developed to estimate the effect of asphaltene deposition on core permeability. The 1-ft-long core was saturated with the live-oil and GI mixture at a pressure greater than the AOP, and then pressure was depleted to a pressure slightly greater than the bubblepoint. Several cycles of charging and depletion were conducted to mimic continuous flow of oil along the path of injected gas and thereby to observe the accumulation of asphaltene on the rock surface. The test results indicated that during this cyclic asphaltene-deposition process, the core permeability to the live mixture decreased in the first few cycles but appeared to stabilize after Cycle 5. The deposited asphaltenes were analyzed further through environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), and their deposition was confirmed by mass balance before and after the tests. Finally, a relationship was established between permeability reduction and asphaltene precipitation. The results from the asphaltene-deposition experiment show that for the sample, fluids, and conditions used, permeability is impaired as asphaltene flocculates and begins to coat the grain surfaces. This impairment reaches a plateau at approximately 40% of the initial permeability. Distribution of asphaltene along the core was measured at the end by segmenting the core and conducting solvent extraction on each segment. Our recommendation is numerical modeling of these test results and using this model to forecast the magnitude of the permeability impairment in a reservoir setting during miscible GI.


Author(s):  
Erhui Luo ◽  
Zifei Fan ◽  
Yongle Hu ◽  
Lun Zhao ◽  
Jianjun Wang

Produced gas containing the acid gas reinjection is one of the effective enhanced oil recovery methods, not only saving costs of disposing acid gases and zero discharge of greenhouse gases but also supporting reservoir pressure. The subsurface fluid from the Carboniferous carbonate reservoir in the southern margin of the Pre-Caspian basin in Central Asia has low density, low viscosity, high concentrations of H2S (15%) and CO2 (4%), high solution gas/oil ratio. The reservoir is lack of fresh water because of being far away onshore. Pilot test has already been implemented for the acid gas reinjection. Firstly, in our work a scheme of crude oil composition grouping with 15 compositions was presented on the basis of bottomhole sampling from DSTs of four wells. After matching PVT physical experiments including viscosity, density and gas/oil ratio and pressure–temperature (P–T) phase diagram by tuning critical properties of highly uncertain heavy components, the compositional model with phase behavior was built under meeting accuracy of phase fitting, which was used to evaluate mechanism of miscibility development in the acid gas injection process. Then using a cell-to-cell simulation method, vaporizing and/or condensing gas drive mechanisms were investigated for mixtures consisting of various proportions of CH4, CO2 and H2S in the gas injection process. Moreover, effects of gas compositions on miscible mechanisms have also been determined. With the aid of pressure-composition diagrams and pseudoternary diagrams generated from the Equation of State (EoS), pressures of First Contact Miscibility (FCM) and Multiple Contact Miscibility (MCM) for various gases mixing with the reservoir oil sample under reservoir temperature were calculated. Simulation results show that pressures of FCM are higher than those of MCM, and CO2 and H2S are able to reduce the miscible pressure. At the same time, H2S is stronger. As the CH4 content increases, both pressures of FCM and MCM are higher. But incremental values of MCM decrease. In addition, calculated envelopes of pseudoternary diagrams for mixtures of CH4, CO2 and H2S gases of varying composition with acid gas injection have features of bell shape, hourglass shape and triangle shape, which can be used to identify vaporizing and/or condensing gas drives. Finally, comparison of the real produced gas and the one deprived of its C3+ was performed to determine types of miscibility and calculate pressures of FCM and MCM. This study provides a theoretical guideline for selection of injection gas to improve miscibility and oil recovery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 3313-3328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alay Arya ◽  
Xiaodong Liang ◽  
Nicolas von Solms ◽  
Georgios M. Kontogeorgis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document