A Case Study: A Successful Steam Flooding Project to Enhance oil Recovery of Low-permeability, Light-oil Waterflooding Reservoir

Author(s):  
Shuhong Wu ◽  
Han Min ◽  
Desheng Ma ◽  
Yongbin Wu ◽  
Qian Yu ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhong Wu ◽  
Zhongyi Zhang ◽  
Yongbin Wu ◽  
Shen Dehuang ◽  
Yu Qian ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shokoya ◽  
S. A. (Raj) Mehta ◽  
R. G. Moore ◽  
B. B. Maini ◽  
M. Pooladi-Darvish ◽  
...  

Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temperature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near–miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in some of these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116°C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 27.63 MPa to 46.06 MPa. The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 6242-6249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changjiu Wang ◽  
Huiqing Liu ◽  
Zhanxi Pang ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Changyong Chen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 383-390 ◽  
pp. 3809-3813
Author(s):  
Yong Li Wang ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Zhi Guo Fu ◽  
Shu Xia Liu ◽  
Bai Lin Yu ◽  
...  

The pilot block is a heterogeneous reservoir with low permeability which is only 100-200(mD). Polymer flooding will be used to enhance oil recovery (EOR). Therefore, some experiment will be carried out in this pilot block .According to the simulation results, we can infer the effect factors of the polymer flooding such as concentration, injection rate, slug amounts, and well pattern. It gives us effective information for the field development plan.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 423
Author(s):  
Shuwen Xue ◽  
Yanhong Zhao ◽  
Chunling Zhou ◽  
Guangming Zhang ◽  
Fulin Chen ◽  
...  

Polymer hydrolysis polyacrylamide and microbes have been used to enhance oil recovery in many oil reservoirs. However, the application of this two-method combination was less investigated, especially in low permeability reservoirs. In this work, two bacteria, a rhamnolipid-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8D and a lipopeptide-producing Bacillus subtilis S4, were used together with hydrolysis poly-acrylamide in a low permeability heterogeneous core physical model. The results showed that when the two bacterial fermentation liquids were used at a ratio by volumeof 1:3 (v:v), the mixture showed the optimal physicochemical properties for oil-displacement. In addition, the mixture was stable under the conditions of various temperature (20–70 °C) and salinity (0–22%). When the polymer and bacteria were mixed together, it had no significant effects in the viscosity of polymer hydrolysis polyacrylamide and the viability of bacteria. The core oil-displacement test displayed that polymer hydrolysis polyacrylamide addition followed by the bacterial mixture injection could significantly enhance oil recovery. The recovery rate was increased by 15.01% and 10.03%, respectively, compared with the sole polymer hydrolysis polyacrylamide flooding and microbial flooding. Taken together, these results suggest that the strategy of polymer hydrolysis poly-acrylamide addition followed by microbial flooding is beneficial for improving oil recovery in heterogeneous low permeability reservoirs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document