El Borma - Bright Water - Tertiary Method Of Enhanced Oil Recovery For A Mature Field

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghaddab Fethi ◽  
K. Kaddour ◽  
M. Tesconi ◽  
Brancolini Alberto ◽  
Carniani Carlo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Mature Field

scholarly journals Predictive data analytics application for enhanced oil recovery in a mature field in the Middle East

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-399
Author(s):  
Alklih Mohamad YOUSEF ◽  
Ghahfarokhi Payam KAVOUSI ◽  
Marwan ALNUAIMI ◽  
Yara ALATRACH
Keyword(s):  
Middle East ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Data Analytics ◽  
Mature Field

scholarly journals Well Integrity Study for CO_2 WAG Application in Mature Field X, South Sumatra Area for the Fulfillment as CO2 Sequestration Sink

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-93
Author(s):  
Steven Chandra ◽  
Prasandi Abdul Aziz ◽  
Muhammad Raykhan Naufal ◽  
Wijoyo Niti Daton
Keyword(s):  
Corrosion Rate ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Material Selection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Oil Companies ◽  
Water Alternating Gas ◽  
Load Calculation ◽  
Mature Field

The most of today's global oil production comes from mature fields. Oil companies and governments are both concerned about increasing oil recovery from aging resources. To maintain oil production, the mature field must apply the Enhanced Oil Recovery method.  water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection is an enhanced oil recovery method designed to improve sweep efficiency during  injection with the injected water to control the mobility of . This study will discuss possible corrosion during  and water injection and the casing load calculation along with the production tubing during the injection phase. The following study also performed a suitable material selection for the best performance injection. This research was conducted by evaluating casing integrity for simulate  water-alternating-gas (WAG) to be applied in the X-well in the Y-field, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Corrosion prediction were performed using Electronic Corrosion Engineer (ECE®) corrosion model and for the strength of tubing which included burst, collapse, and tension of production casing was assessed using Microsoft Excel. This study concluded that for the casing load calculation results in 600 psi of burst pressure, collapse pressure of 2,555.64 psi, and tension of 190,528 lbf. All of these results are still following the K-55 production casing rating. While injecting , the maximum corrosion rate occurs. It has a maximum corrosion rate of 2.02 mm/year and a minimum corrosion rate of 0.36 mm/year. With this value, it is above NORSOK Standard M-001 which is 2 mm/year and needs to be evaluated to prevent the rate to remain stable and not decrease in the following years. To prevent the effect of maximum corrosion rate, the casing material must use a SM13CR (Martensitic Stainless Steel) which is not sour service material.

Well Integrity Study for CO2 WAG Application in Mature Field X, South Sumatra Area for the Fulfillment as CO2 Sequestration Sink

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-121
Author(s):  
Steven Chandra ◽  
Prasandi A Aziz ◽  
Muhammad Raykhan Naufal ◽  
Wijoyo Niti Daton
Keyword(s):  
Corrosion Rate ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Material Selection ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Oil Companies ◽  
Water Alternating Gas ◽  
Load Calculation ◽  
Mature Field

The most of today's global oil production comes from mature fields. Oil companies and governments are both concerned about increasing oil recovery from aging resources. To maintain oil production, the mature field must apply the Enhanced Oil Recovery method.  water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection is an enhanced oil recovery method designed to improve sweep efficiency during  injection with the injected water to control the mobility of . This study will discuss possible corrosion during  and water injection and the casing load calculation along with the production tubing during the injection phase. The following study also performed a suitable material selection for the best performance injection. This research was conducted by evaluating casing integrity for simulate  water-alternating-gas (WAG) to be applied in the X-well in the Y-field, South Sumatra, Indonesia. Corrosion prediction were performed using Electronic Corrosion Engineer (ECE®) corrosion model and for the strength of tubing which included burst, collapse, and tension of production casing was assessed using Microsoft Excel. This study concluded that for the casing load calculation results in 600 psi of burst pressure, collapse pressure of 2,555.64 psi, and tension of 190,528 lbf. All of these results are still following the K-55 production casing rating. While injecting , the maximum corrosion rate occurs. It has a maximum corrosion rate of 2.02 mm/year and a minimum corrosion rate of 0.36 mm/year. With this value, it is above NORSOK Standard M-001 which is 2 mm/year and needs to be evaluated to prevent the rate to remain stable and not decrease in the following years. To prevent the effect of maximum corrosion rate, the casing material must use a SM13CR (Martensitic Stainless Steel) which is not sour service material.

Preculaatities of evaluation of the effectiveness of flow deflection technologies

2018 ◽  
pp. 93-101
Author(s):  
A. A. Kazakov ◽  
V. V. Chelepov ◽  
R. G. Ramazanov
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Production Well ◽  
Oil Companies ◽  
Efficiency Calculation ◽  
Petroleum Companies ◽  
Flow Deflection ◽  
Recovery Methods

The features of evaluation of the effectiveness of flow deflection technologies of enhanced oil recovery methods. It is shown that the effect of zeroing component intensification of fluid withdrawal leads to an overestimation of the effect of flow deflection technology (PRP). Used in oil companies practice PRP efficiency calculation, which consists in calculating the effect on each production well responsive to subsequent summation effects, leads to the selective taking into account only the positive components of PRP effect. Negative constituents — not taken into account and it brings overestimate over to overstating of efficiency. On actual examples the groundless overstating and understating of efficiency is shown overestimate at calculations on applied in petroleum companies by a calculation.

A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF MICROBIAL ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY IN POROUS MEDIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-272
Author(s):  
Jianlong Xiu ◽  
Tianyuan Wang ◽  
Ying Guo ◽  
Qingfeng Cui ◽  
Lixin Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Porous Media ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document