Matching of Production History and 4D Seismic Data--Application to the Girassol Field, Offshore Angola

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Roggero ◽  
Didier Yu Ding ◽  
Philippe Berthet ◽  
Olivier Lerat ◽  
Julien Cap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Data Application ◽  
Production History ◽  
4D Seismic

Seismic History Matching of Nelson Using Time-Lapse Seismic Data: An Investigation of 4D Signature Normalization

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 621-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Kazemi ◽  
Karl D. Stephen ◽  
Asghar Shams
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
History Matching ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Production Data ◽  
Similar Degree ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Matching Process ◽  
Production History ◽  
Induced Changes ◽  
4D Seismic

Summary History matching of a reservoir model is always a difficult task. In some fields, we can use time-lapse (4D) seismic data to detect production-induced changes as a complement to more conventional production data. In seismic history matching, we predict these data and compare to observations. Observed time-lapse data often consist of relative measures of change, which require normalization. We investigate different normalization approaches, based on predicted 4D data, and assess their impact on history matching. We apply the approach to the Nelson field in which four surveys are available over 9 years of production. We normalize the 4D signature in a number of ways. First, we use predictions of 4D signature from vertical wells that match production, and we derive a normalization function. As an alternative, we use crossplots of the full-field prediction against observation. Normalized observations are used in an automatic-history-matching process, in which the model is updated. We analyze the results of the two normalization approaches and compare against the case of just using production data. The result shows that when we use 4D data normalized to wells, we obtain 49% reduced misfit along with 36% improvement in predictions. Also over the whole reservoir, 8 and 7% reduction of misfits for 4D seismic are obtained in history and prediction periods, respectively. When we use only production data, the production history match is improved to a similar degree (45%), but in predictions, the improvement is only 25% and the 4D seismic misfit is 10% worse. Finding the unswept areas in the reservoir is always a challenge in reservoir management. By using 4D data in history matching, we can better predict reservoir behavior and identify regions of remaining oil.

scholarly journals History Matching of Production and 4D Seismic Data: Application to the Girassol Field, Offshore Angola

2012 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Roggero ◽  
O. Lerat ◽  
D.Y. Ding ◽  
P. Berthet ◽  
C. Bordenave ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
History Matching ◽  
Data Application ◽  
4D Seismic

Use of Quantitative 4D-Seismic Data in Automatic History Match

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Cunha Mattos Portella ◽  
Alexandre Anoze Emerick
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
History Match ◽  
4D Seismic

scholarly journals Time-Lapse Seismic Monitoring of Onshore Reservoirs in Niger Delta, Field ‘K’ as a Case Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ogbamikhumi ◽  
T. Tralagba ◽  
E. E. Osagiede
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Acoustic Impedance ◽  
Niger Delta ◽  
Rock Physics ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Seismic Survey ◽  
Impedance Change ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Reservoir Fluid ◽  
4D Seismic

Field ‘K’ is a mature field in the coastal swamp onshore Niger delta, which has been producing since 1960. As a huge producing field with some potential for further sustainable production, field monitoring is therefore important in the identification of areas of unproduced hydrocarbon. This can be achieved by comparing production data with the corresponding changes in acoustic impedance observed in the maps generated from base survey (initial 3D seismic) and monitor seismic survey (4D seismic) across the field. This will enable the 4D seismic data set to be used for mapping reservoir details such as advancing water front and un-swept zones. The availability of good quality onshore time-lapse seismic data for Field ‘K’ acquired in 1987 and 2002 provided the opportunity to evaluate the effect of changes in reservoir fluid saturations on time-lapse amplitudes. Rock physics modelling and fluid substitution studies on well logs were carried out, and acoustic impedance change in the reservoir was estimated to be in the range of 0.25% to about 8%. Changes in reservoir fluid saturations were confirmed with time-lapse amplitudes within the crest area of the reservoir structure where reservoir porosity is 0.25%. In this paper, we demonstrated the use of repeat Seismic to delineate swept zones and areas hit with water override in a producing onshore reservoir.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document