scholarly journals A PILOT EXAMINATION OF DYADIC COPING INVENTORY AMONG JAPANESE MARRIED COUPLES

PSYCHOLOGIA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji YOKOTANI ◽  
Tai KUROSAWA
Keyword(s):  
Married Couples ◽  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory

scholarly journals Marital Adjustment, Love, Personal Intimacy, Personality, Dyadic Coping and Spirituality on Marital Stability

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
S. Priyadharshini ◽  
Rejani Thudalikunnil Gopalan
Keyword(s):  
Marital Adjustment ◽  
Psychosocial Factor ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Marital Stability ◽  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Sexual Intimacy ◽  
Marital Longevity ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory ◽  
The Relationship

Marital Stability is interpreted as whether a couple in a marriage remains together, instead of separating or getting divorced. It is also called as marital longevity or duration of marriage. The aim of the study is to find the relationship between different psychosocial factor (marital adjustment, love, personal intimacy personality, dyadic coping, and spirituality) and marital stability. For the purpose of sampling, thirty married couples were randomly selected using stratified random sampling. The measuring tools used were Locke-Wallace marital adjustment questionnaire (Marital adjustment), Love scale (Love), Personal assessment of intimacy in relationship (Personal intimacy), Big five inventory (personality), Dyadic coping inventory (Dyadic coping) and the daily spiritual experience scale (Spirituality).Six null hypotheses were raised and tested using descriptive and inferential statistics (Percentage, mean, standard deviation and correlation). The research finding shows that there is a significant negative correlation between sexual intimacy and marital stability(r= -.44 and p<.01). All other variables (Marital adjustment, love, personal intimacy, personality, dyadic coping and spirituality) are not shown to be contributing to marital stability.

scholarly journals Centrality of Religiosity and Dyadic Coping in Close Romantic Relationships: Actor Partner Interdependence Model

Religions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 978
Author(s):  
Anna M. Wendołowska ◽  
Dorota Czyżowska
Keyword(s):  
Marital Satisfaction ◽  
Romantic Relationships ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Religious People ◽  
Civil Marriage ◽  
Significant Relationships ◽  
Actor Partner Interdependence Model ◽  
Dyadic Analyses

Some studies suggest that religious people cope better with stress. For married couples, if partners perceive their relationship as sacred, supportive dyadic coping mediates the association of sanctification with marital satisfaction and well-being. In the current study, applying the actor–partner interdependence model to 116 Polish couples (n = 232), aged between 21 and 64 (males: M = 37.8, SD = 11.8; females M = 37.1, SD = 12.0), we examined the link between centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping. Although general dyadic analyses indicate that centrality of religiosity and dyadic coping are unrelated concepts, at the subscales level, we could observe few significant relationships. The results show that Polish religious men rate their common dyadic coping low. Actor effects in women are moderated by the type of relationship (cohabitation and civil marriage vs. catholic marriage).

Initial validation of the dyadic coping inventory for financial stress

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-381
Author(s):  
Mariana K. Falconier ◽  
Petruta P. Rusu ◽  
Guy Bodenmann
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stress ◽  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Initial Validation ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory

scholarly journals Dyadic Coping in the U.S.: Psychometric Properties and Validity for Use of the English Version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 570-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley K. Randall ◽  
Peter Hilpert ◽  
Laura E. Jimenez-Arista ◽  
Kelsey J. Walsh ◽  
Guy Bodenmann
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
English Version ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals Effects of adult attachment on health outcomes among couples facing ovarian cancer and the mediating role of dyadic coping

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra Crangle
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Anxious Attachment ◽  
Avoidant Attachment ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory

Background: Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed at a late stage of illness, raising significant challenges to health-related quality of life (QOL). Increasingly, cancer is conceptualized as an interpersonal stressor that significantly impacts patients as well as their spouses. It has been suggested that adult attachment significantly impacts health outcomes by way of dyadic processes. The present study used the actor partner interdependence model (APIM) to examine the dyadic effects of adult attachment and dyadic coping on QOL, and whether dyadic coping mediated the associations between attachment and QOL. Methods: Couples (N=106) facing ovarian cancer were recruited from a comprehensive cancer centre in Toronto, ON. Attachment was measured by the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale – Revised, dyadic coping was measured by the Dyadic Coping Inventory, and QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment. APIM analyses evaluated within person and cross-dyadic effects. Role (patients compared with spouses) was examined as a moderator. Results: There were significant within person effects of anxious attachment on physical, social, emotional, and functional QOL. There were also significant within person effects of avoidant attachment on social, emotional, and functional QOL. Positive and negative dyadic coping demonstrated significant within person effects on social and functional QOL. There were no significant cross-dyadic effects nor was there evidence of moderation by role. The within person association between avoidant attachment and social QOL was significantly mediated by positive dyadic coping. The within person association between anxious attachment and social QOL was significantly mediated by positive and negative dyadic coping. Additionally, there was a significant indirect cross-dyadic effect, such that greater anxious attachment reported by one partner was associated with less positive dyadic coping and subsequently less social QOL reported by the other partner. Discussion: Adult attachment and coping as a couple are important considerations in understanding QOL among both patients and spouses. Intervention strategies to address attachment, and the behavioural system associated with attachment, such as dyadic coping, may be useful in addressing impaired individual well-being. Future studies should consider additional dyadic processes that may account for the negative effects of attachment on QOL such as intimacy.

Dyadic Coping Inventory

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Bodenmann ◽  
Laura Jimenez Arista ◽  
Kelsey J. Walsh ◽  
Ashley K. Randall
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory

Dyadic coping in Latino couples: validity of the Spanish version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Karin Falconier ◽  
Fridtjof Nussbeck ◽  
Guy Bodenmann
Keyword(s):  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory ◽  
Latino Couples

scholarly journals Effects of adult attachment on health outcomes among couples facing ovarian cancer and the mediating role of dyadic coping

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra Crangle
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Adult Attachment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Dyadic Coping ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Anxious Attachment ◽  
Avoidant Attachment ◽  
Dyadic Coping Inventory

Background: Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed at a late stage of illness, raising significant challenges to health-related quality of life (QOL). Increasingly, cancer is conceptualized as an interpersonal stressor that significantly impacts patients as well as their spouses. It has been suggested that adult attachment significantly impacts health outcomes by way of dyadic processes. The present study used the actor partner interdependence model (APIM) to examine the dyadic effects of adult attachment and dyadic coping on QOL, and whether dyadic coping mediated the associations between attachment and QOL. Methods: Couples (N=106) facing ovarian cancer were recruited from a comprehensive cancer centre in Toronto, ON. Attachment was measured by the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale – Revised, dyadic coping was measured by the Dyadic Coping Inventory, and QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment. APIM analyses evaluated within person and cross-dyadic effects. Role (patients compared with spouses) was examined as a moderator. Results: There were significant within person effects of anxious attachment on physical, social, emotional, and functional QOL. There were also significant within person effects of avoidant attachment on social, emotional, and functional QOL. Positive and negative dyadic coping demonstrated significant within person effects on social and functional QOL. There were no significant cross-dyadic effects nor was there evidence of moderation by role. The within person association between avoidant attachment and social QOL was significantly mediated by positive dyadic coping. The within person association between anxious attachment and social QOL was significantly mediated by positive and negative dyadic coping. Additionally, there was a significant indirect cross-dyadic effect, such that greater anxious attachment reported by one partner was associated with less positive dyadic coping and subsequently less social QOL reported by the other partner. Discussion: Adult attachment and coping as a couple are important considerations in understanding QOL among both patients and spouses. Intervention strategies to address attachment, and the behavioural system associated with attachment, such as dyadic coping, may be useful in addressing impaired individual well-being. Future studies should consider additional dyadic processes that may account for the negative effects of attachment on QOL such as intimacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document