Mobile Pediatric Orthopaedic Education (MoPOEd)

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (22) ◽  
pp. e134(1)-e134(5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M Bernstein ◽  
Carol B Cozen ◽  
Hugh G Watts ◽  
William Hohl
2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (23) ◽  
pp. e194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Feghhi ◽  
Daniel Komlos ◽  
Nitin Agarwal ◽  
Sanjeev Sabharwal

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rameez A. Qudsi ◽  
Heather J. Roberts ◽  
Abhiram R. Bhashyam ◽  
Elena Losina ◽  
Donald S. Bae ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 598A-598A
Author(s):  
Thao Nguyen ◽  
Xuyang Song ◽  
Xiaomao Zhu ◽  
Joshua M. Abzug

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 618
Author(s):  
Vito Pavone ◽  
Andrea Vescio ◽  
Annalisa Culmone ◽  
Alessia Caldaci ◽  
Piermario La Rosa ◽  
...  

Background: Dimeglio (DimS) and Pirani (PirS) scores are the most common scores used in congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver reliability of these scores and how clinical practice can influence the clinical outcome of clubfoot through the DimS and Pirs. Methods: Fifty-four feet were assessed by six trained independent observers through the DimS and PirS: three consultants (OS), and three residents (RS) divided into three pediatric orthopaedic surgeons (PeO) and three non-pediatric orthopaedic surgeons (NPeO). Results: The PirS and DimS Scores were strongly correlated. In the same way, OS and RS, PirS, and DimS scores were strongly correlated, and the interobserver reliability ranked “good” in the comparison between PeO and NPeO. In fully trained paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, an “excellent” interobserver reliability was found but was only “good” in the NPeO cohort. Conclusions: In conclusion, after careful preparation, at least six months of observation of children with CTEV, PirS and DimS proved to be valid in terms of clinical evaluation. However, more experience with CTEV leads to a better clinical evaluation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan S. Chan ◽  
David A. Podeszwa ◽  
Debra Brown ◽  
Adam J. Starr

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-107
Author(s):  
Ali Al-kulabi ◽  
Mohamed A Mansour ◽  
Azeem Thahir

This literature review aims to provide an account of the changes to orthopaedics in the era of COVID-19. Herein, the authors explored the use of telemedicine in orthopaedics as well as changes in surgical protocols, screening methods, work priorities and orthopaedic education. There was increased utilisation of telemedicine in orthopaedic training and outpatient cases as a means to provide continuity in education and care. The need to implement social distancing measures, coupled with the reduced availability of staff, has dictated that the practice of orthopaedics shifts to focus on acute care whilst redistributing resources to front-line specialities. This was facilitated by the cancellation of electives and the reduction of outpatient clinics. Thus, it is demonstrated that major changes have been implemented in many aspects of orthopaedic practice in order to address the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Prior ◽  
Ngozi Ogburu-Ogbonnaya ◽  
William R. Barfield ◽  
James F. Mooney ◽  
Sara Van Nortwick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document