scholarly journals The Impact of Michigan’s Partial Repeal of the Universal Motorcycle Helmet Law on Helmet Use, Fatalities, and Head Injuries

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Carter ◽  
Lisa Buckley ◽  
Carol A. C. Flannagan ◽  
Jessica B. Cicchino ◽  
Mark Hemmila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head Injuries ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
Motorcycle Helmet ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Medical Cost and Motorcycle Helmet Law in Taiwan

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Chin-Shyan Chen ◽  
Tsai-Ching Liu
Keyword(s):  
Head Injury ◽  
Medical Cost ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
Motorcycle Helmet ◽  
The Impact

The objective of this study was to examine whether the implementation of the helmet law had reduced the likelihood of head injury and the associated medical cost in Taiwan. Data were taken from the 1996 and 1998 population-based data. In total, 888,179 and 921,058 effective samples were used in the study from the two years. Two different types of regression model were adopted to evaluate the impact of the motorcycle helmet use law on incidences of head injury and associated medical cost and hospital length of stay. The results reveal that medical cost is down by 11.5 percent and hospital LOS has fallen by 18.58 percent. Thus, with the introduction of the motorcycle helmet use law having had a demonstrably positive influence on motorcycle head injuries and fatalities, significant savings are clearly being achieved, not only in terms of economic and social costs, but also with regard to medical cost.

Bicycle helmet use to reduce the impact of head injuries in ladder users

2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 1026-1029
Author(s):  
Leigh R. Warren ◽  
Simon Harley ◽  
Jeffrey Dutschke ◽  
Andrew van den Berg ◽  
Christopher Dobbins
Keyword(s):  
Head Injuries ◽  
Bicycle Helmet ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
The Impact

THE IMPACT OF MOTORCYCLE HELMET-USE

1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1035
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Offner ◽  
Frederick P. Rivara ◽  
Ronald V. Maier
Keyword(s):  
Helmet Use ◽  
Motorcycle Helmet ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The impact of helmet use on oral and maxillofacial injuries associated with electric-powered bikes or powered scooter: a retrospective cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yafit Hamzani ◽  
Dror Bar Hai ◽  
Nir Cohen ◽  
Michael J. Drescher ◽  
Gavriel Chaushu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Head Injury ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Soft Tissue Injuries ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Maxillofacial Injuries ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Electric bikes (E-bikes) and powered scooters (P-scooters) have become increasingly popular modes of public transportation, but they have been associated with injuries of all kinds, including dental trauma. Helmet use is promoted as a means of reducing injuries in accidents involving motorized and unmotorized vehicles. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of helmet use on the number and severity of oral and maxillofacial injuries caused by E-bikes and P-scooters. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study design was used. The cohort included all patients referred to the emergency department of a tertiary medical center in 2014–2020 with oral and maxillofacial injuries involving E-bikes or P-scooters. Data were collected from the medical files on demographics, types of injuries, circumstances of occurrence, work-up, treatment, and outcome. Use of a helmet was recorded in each case. Results Of the total 1417 patients referred to the emergency department for E-bike and P-scooter-related trauma, 62 had oral and maxillofacial injuries, including 57 riders and 5 pedestrians. All had hard- or soft-tissue injuries; 20 (32.2%) had head injuries and 22 (35.5%) had dentoalveolar injuries. Eleven riders had worn a helmet at the time of injury (17.7%). Helmet use was associated with time of injury (weekday/weekend, daytime/night-time), type of motorized vehicle (E-bike or P-scooter), head injury, and number of bone fractures. Head injuries occurred more often on the weekend (57.9%) than during the week (20.9%) and were more likely to occur in riders who were not protected by a helmet (37.3% vs 18.2%). Patients who used helmets also had a lower rate of fractured bones (18.2%) and dentoalveolar injuries (23.7%) than patients who did not (68.8 and 37.3%, respectively). Interestingly, helmet use had no protective effect on soft-tissue injuries. Conclusions Helmet use by E-bike and P-scooter riders decreased the probability of head injury and of hard tissue and dentoalveolar injuries. These results may provide guidance for effective legislation and regulation of helmet use and improved treatment protocols for general and dental physicians.

Pediatric Equestrian Injuries: Assessing The Impact of Helmet Use

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-489
Author(s):  
G. Randall Bond ◽  
Richard A. Christoph ◽  
Bradley M. Rodgers
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
University Of Virginia ◽  
Severity Scale ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The University ◽  
The Impact

Objective. To assess the impact of helmet use on the pattern, and severity of pediatric equestrian injuries. Design. A prospective observational study of all children less than 15 years of age who were brought to the University of Virginia children's Emergency Department with horse-related injuries. Results. During the two-year period of the study, 32 children were evaluated. Two children were injured when a horse stepped on them. Thirty children fell from or were thrown from a horse. Of these, 20 were wearing a helmet. Head injuries were more frequent in those patients not wearing helmets. The mean Modified Injury Severity Scale (MISS) score for riders without a helmet (12.9) was significantly higher (more severe) than that for helmeted riders (2.8). All three patients with a Glascow Coma Score <15 on arrival were not wearing a helmet at the time of injury. The frequency of hospitalization was significantly higher for those not wearing a helmet. Compared with other common mechanisms of childhood injury the mean Modified Injury Severity Scale score of injured riders was exceeded only by that of pedestrians struck by a car. Conclusion. Equestrian injuries are more severe than those suffered from other common pediatric mechanisms. Helmet use is associated with decreased frequency and severity of central nervous system injury.

Head Injury in Facial Impact—A Finite Element Analysis of Helmet Chin Bar Performance

2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 640-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Han Chang ◽  
Li-Tung Chang ◽  
Guan-Liang Chang ◽  
Shyh-Chour Huang ◽  
Chiou-Hua Wang
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Head Injury ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Maximum Acceleration ◽  
Explicit Finite Element ◽  
Motorcycle Helmet ◽  
Energy Absorbing ◽  
Protective Performance ◽  
The Impact

The chin bar of a motorcycle helmet protects the rider from facial and head injuries. To evaluate the protective performance of chin bars against head injuries from facial impacts, an explicit finite element method was used to simulate the Snell Memorial Foundation test and a proposed drop test. The maximum acceleration and Head Injury Criterion (HIC) were employed to assess the impact-absorbing capability of the chin bar. The results showed that the proposed approach should be more practical than the Snell test, and provided more information for improving the chin bar design to protect against head injuries. The shell stiffness was important in determining the protective ability of the chin bar, but a chin bar with only an outer shell and comfort foam offered inadequate protection. An energy-absorbing liner was essential to increase the protective performance of the chin bar and the liner density should be denser than that used in the cranial portion of the helmet. For the chin bar with energy-absorbing liner, a shell design that is less stiff would provide better protection. [S0148-0731(00)01206-1]

Exploring the Economics of Motorcycle Helmet Laws — Implications for Low and Middle-Income Countries

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Hyder ◽  
H. Waters ◽  
T. Phillips ◽  
J. Rehwinkel
Keyword(s):  
Head Injuries ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Motorcycle Helmet ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Helmet Laws ◽  
Low And Middle Income

This paper reviews economic evaluations of motorcycle helmet interventions in preventing injuries. A comprehensive literature review focusing on the e fectiveness of motorcycle helmet use, and on mandatory helmet laws and their enforcement was done. When helmet laws were lifted between 1976-80, 48 states within the USA experienced a cost of $342,047 per excess fatality of annual net savings. Helmet laws in the USA had a benefit-cost ratio of 1.33 to 5.07. Taiwan witnessed a 14% decline in motorcycle fatalities and a 22% reduction of head injury fatalities with the introduction of a helmet law. In Thailand, where 70-90% of all crashes involve motorcycle, after enforcement of a helmet law, helmet-use increased five-fold, the number of injured motorcyclists decreased by 33.5%, head injuries decreased by 41.4%, and deaths decreased by 20.8%. There is considerable evidence that mandatory helmet laws with enforcement alleviate the burden of tra fic injuries greatly. For low and middle-income countries with high rates of motorcycle injuries, enforced, mandatory motorcycle helmet laws are potentially one of the most cost-e fective interventions available. Asia Pac J Public Health 2007; 19(2): 16—22.

The Impact of Motorcycle Helmet Use

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 636-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICK J. OFFNER ◽  
FREDERICK P. RIVARA ◽  
RONALD V. MAIER
Keyword(s):  
Helmet Use ◽  
Motorcycle Helmet ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals P074: Impact of wearing a helmet on the risk of hospitalization after a sport injury

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S103-S103
Author(s):  
N. Le Sage ◽  
M. Prévost ◽  
B. Batomen Kuimi ◽  
A. Gagnon ◽  
V. Bergeron-Larose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head Injuries ◽  
Skull Fracture ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
Hospitalization Rates ◽  
Confounding Variables ◽  
Downhill Skiing ◽  
Canadian Provinces ◽  
Injury Reporting ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Six Canadian provinces recently made bicycle helmet mandatory and subsequent data concerning hospitalization rates after head injuries in cyclists were controversial. Furthermore, there remains an important proportion of participants who don’t wear a helmet in sporting activity. We thus wanted to estimate the impact of helmet use in sport injuries on the risk of hospitalization. Methods: Study participants were patients of all age presenting at the emergency department of the Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus du CHU de Québec for a trauma that occurred in a sport in which it’s possible to wear a helmet. Data were collected from information provided by the patient and from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program’ (CHIRPP) database. Descriptive and multivariate analyses have been carried out using these data. We performed binomial logistic regression analyzes to estimate the risk adjusted for potentially confounding variables: age, sex and number of injuries. Results: Most patients included in the study (n=169) were males (69.8%) aged between 10 and 30 years (50.3%). Sports most frequently involved in trauma were cycling (31.4%), downhill skiing (18.3%), snowboarding (14.8%), hockey (11.8%), and skateboarding (5.9%). Overall, 70.4% of patients were wearing a helmet at the time of injury. Helmet use in sports was associated with a reduction of 52% of the risk of hospitalization (RR: 0.48 [CI: 95%: 0.25-0.93]) after a trauma. In addition, patients not wearing a helmet had higher proportions of intracranial hemorrhage (10% vs. 1.7%) and skull fracture (8% vs 2.5%). Conclusion: Results suggest that helmet use decreases the risk of hospitalization for trauma sustained in sports in which it’s possible to wear a helmet.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document