Young Mozambican African immigrants in Portugal: Portugal, a host society or a society of exclusion? Consequences.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Forte
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mana K. Ali ◽  
Denee T. Mwendwa ◽  
Natalie Ramsey ◽  
Madia Ricks ◽  
Anne Sumner

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2247-PUB
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER K. HWANG ◽  
ELVIRA AGRON ◽  
ANNE E. SUMNER ◽  
SARA M. BRIKER ◽  
JESSICA Y. ADUWO ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Pennesi

Newcomers to Canada whose names index identities other than “white” and “English” face pressure to alter their names to facilitate integration. Some immigrants oppose the forces of conformity and refuse to assimilate their names. In interviews, they explain this stance using discourses of agency centring on a belief in true names, a moral obligation to get names right, and a need for a strong self. Focusing on ideologies of identity and language in their meta-agentive discourses, I argue that the act of immigrants keeping their ethnic names is a political move to redistribute responsibility for the integration of newcomers into the host society.


2020 ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
V. K. Potemkin ◽  
I. O. Fedorova

This article examines the attitude of the host population of St. Petersburg to migrants. Studying the attitudes of the host society, the population of St. Petersburg, allows us to reveal the completeness of the process of adaptation and integration of migrants. The article compares the results of two surveys of St. Petersburg residents conducted by the authors in 2012 and 2020. Social distance, attitudes towards migrants, and opinions on the integration of migrants are analyzed in the article.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Miha Zobec

Abstract This article explores how the Kingdom of Yugoslavia tried to co-opt Slovenes who emigrated from the Italian Julian March/Venezia Giulia region to Argentina (a community of around 25,000 emigrants) into the frame of its unbound nation and analyzes the emigrants' attitudes towards the Kingdom. As emigrants derived from the territory were considered by Yugoslav authorities to be “unredeemed,” the article, explores how Yugoslavia addressed its “two diasporas,” one of stranded minorities and one of emigrants. Secondly, it examines how diplomatic representatives suppressed emigrants' opposition during times of economic crisis and dictatorial government in Yugoslavia and Argentina. Thirdly, it analyzes the rapprochement between the emigrant community and diplomatic representatives which occurred in the second half of the 1930s. It argues that because the diplomatic corps were ultimately unable to provide the emigrants socio-economic assistance or address the issue of the Julian March minority, emigrants devised alternative visions of belonging. In addition, the article suggests that many emigrants, caught between a powerless homeland and a host society unwelcoming of their particular identities, drifted into Argentine anonymity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-149
Author(s):  
Philomina Okeke-Ihejirika ◽  
Gillian Creese ◽  
Michael Frishkopf ◽  
Njoki Wane
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Claudia Diehl ◽  
Elisabeth Liebau ◽  
Peter Mühlau

AbstractBased on longitudinal data from Germany, we analyze how perceptions of discrimination change once migrants’ integration evolves. Individuals who identify more strongly with the host country, speak the language, have native friends, and are adequately employed report less discrimination overall. However, group-specific analyses reveal that German-born Turks feel more rather than less discriminated against after their language skills and their identification increase. For this group, we find evidence for the “integration paradox”, i.e., the finding that better educated migrants have more rather than less negative attitudes about the host society. Results suggest that attributional processes rather than rising exposure to discrimination might be the main mechanism linking integration to higher levels of perceived discrimination. Obviously, discrimination does not disappear for groups facing salient ethnic boundaries and is met with growing awareness and sensitivity among individuals that have become more similar to the majority of members. This, in turn, by no means implies that perceived discrimination is detached from reality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document