scholarly journals Pendulum system with an infinite number of equilibrium states and quasiperiodic dynamics

2016 ◽  
pp. 223-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Kuznetsov ◽  
◽  
S. P. Kuznetsov ◽  
Y. V. Sedova ◽  
◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aba Szollosi ◽  
Ben R. Newell

Abstract The purpose of human cognition depends on the problem people try to solve. Defining the purpose is difficult, because people seem capable of representing problems in an infinite number of ways. The way in which the function of cognition develops needs to be central to our theories.


2008 ◽  
pp. 77-88
Author(s):  
M. Likhachev

The article is devoted to the analysis of methodological problems in using the conception of macroeconomic equilibrium in contemporary economics. The author considers theoretical status and relevance of equilibrium conception and discusses different areas and limits of applicability of the equilibrium theory. Special attention is paid to different epistemological criteria for this theory taking into account both empirical analysis of the real stability of economic systems and the problem of unobservability of equilibrium states.


1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motomiki Uchida ◽  
Yukihiro Toyoda ◽  
Yoshikuni Akiyama ◽  
Kazushi Nakano ◽  
Hideo Nakamura

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sani Gaya ◽  
Anas Abubakar Bisu ◽  
Syed Najib Syed Salim ◽  
I. S. Madugu ◽  
L. A. Yusuf ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-51
Author(s):  
Raphael Lataster

Theistic and analytic philosophers of religion typically privilege classical theism by ignoring or underestimating the great threat of alternative monotheisms.[1] In this article we discuss numerous god-models, such as those involving weak, stupid, evil, morally indifferent, and non-revelatory gods. We find that theistic philosophers have not successfully eliminated these and other possibilities, or argued for their relative improbability. In fact, based on current evidence – especially concerning the hiddenness of God and the gratuitous evils in the world – many of these hypotheses appear to be more probable than theism. Also considering the – arguably infinite – number of alternative monotheisms, the inescapable conclusion is that theism is a very improbable god-concept, even when it is assumed that one and only one transcendent god exists.[1] I take ‘theism’ to mean ‘classical theism’, which is but one of many possible monotheisms. Avoiding much of the discussion around classical theism, I wish to focus on the challenges in arguing for theism over monotheistic alternatives. I consider theism and alternative monotheisms as entailing the notion of divine transcendence.


10.37236/1184 ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Łuczak

An elementary probabilistic argument is presented which shows that for every forest $F$ other than a matching, and every graph $G$ containing a cycle, there exists an infinite number of graphs $J$ such that $J\to (F,G)$ but if we delete from $J$ any edge $e$ the graph $J-e$ obtained in this way does not have this property.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document