scholarly journals Estudio jurídico del caso de Juana Rivas y Francesco Arcuri desde la perspectiva del Derecho Internacional Privado y del Derecho Civil = Legal study of the case of Juana Rivas and Francesco Arcuri from the perspective of Private International Law and Civil Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 728
Author(s):  
Javier Martínez Calvo ◽  
María Jesús Sánchez Cano

 Resumen: El presente trabajo tiene por objeto el estudio del denominado “Caso Juana Rivas”, cuyo desarrollo ha despertado la atención de los medios de comunicación. Dejando al margen el interés mediático, el asunto presenta notable importancia desde el punto de vista jurídico, debido a la presencia de elementos internacionales que vinculan la situación con dos ordenamientos jurídicos, el español y el italiano. Conviene, por tanto, abordar los interrogantes principales de la controversia desde un enfoque internacionalprivatista, así como desde el plano del Derecho comparado.Palabras clave: sustracción de menores, affidamento, collocazione, derecho de visitas, derecho de alimentos. Derecho comparado.Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to study the so-called “Juana Rivas Case”, which has at­tracted the attention of the media. Leaving media interest aside, the case is of considerable importance from a legal point of view, due to the presence of international elements that link the situation with two legal systems, Spanish and Italian. It is therefore appropriate to approach the main questions of the con­troversy from an international-privatist approach, as well as from the point of view of comparative law.Keywords: child abduction, affidamento, collocazione, visiting rights, right to support, Compara­tive law.

1939 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
K. Lipstein

Every approach to the problems of private international law from a comparative point of view must of necessity envisage the differences of basic conceptions between English and Continental law. Quasi-contractual obligations in Continental law are based on a universally recognized principle of natural justice, and if they are often classified as being quasicontractual, this expression is used to distinguish them from obligations arising in contract or tort rather than for the purpose of assimilating them to contract.


Author(s):  
Ignacio Goicoechea ◽  
Hans van Loon

The article discusses the role of judges in the development of private international law (PIL). It highlights the changing role of judges in the context of contemporary globalization, and argues that as a result of the expansion of their international duties, judges, in a way that is analogous to the working cycle of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, also have a role in identifying legal issues that must be addressed by PIL, developing tools to address those issues, ensuring the implementation and operation of these tools, and assessing their effectiveness. The article also highlights the contribution of judges to the development of Hague Conventions, and describes the very important role of Latin American judges in the development of special devices to promote the implementation, operation and assessment of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention in Latin America.


Author(s):  
Kupelyants Hayk

This chapter explores South Caucasian perspectives on the Hague Principles. The rules of private international law in all three South Caucasian countries—Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan—are primarily contained in statutes: the Chapter of Private International Law in Armenia (1998) and separate statutes on Private International Law in Azerbaijan (2000) and Georgia (1998). Article 1253(1) of the Armenian Civil Code and Article 1(2) of the Azerbaijani Act provides that the courts may apply international customs in the area of private international law. In so far as the Hague Principles amount to or eventually crystallize into customary international law, the courts may give effect to the Hague Principles in that manner. Before that happens, there is nothing in the legal systems of either of the three jurisdictions preventing the courts from citing for explanatory and persuasive reasons soft law instruments, such as the Hague Principles. That said, stylistically the judgments of the South Caucasian jurisdictions are often drafted in a very concise and skeletal manner. Soft law instruments and commentary might influence the reasoning of the judges, but they would rarely refer to them in the text of the judgment.


Author(s):  
V.C. Govindaraj

The world has to acknowledge the contribution the Hague Conference on Private International Law has hitherto made and continues to make in its endeavour to obtain from the world community approval and acceptance of the outcome of its efforts to unify rules of conflict of laws. India has become an active member of the Hague Conference. This chapter discusses the recognition of decrees of divorces and judicial separation and maintenance obligations; child custody and child abduction; the law relating to succession; the law relating to service of summons abroad; Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents, 1961; and Hague Convention on Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, 1970.


2020 ◽  
pp. 35-70
Author(s):  
Scott Slorach ◽  
Judith Embley ◽  
Peter Goodchild ◽  
Catherine Shephard

This chapter focuses on the sources of law in England & Wales, and is organised as follows. Section 2.1 describes the key jurisdictions relevant to lawyers in England and Wales. Section 2.2 deals with the issue of where the law comes from: sources of law. Section 2.3 reviews the development of the two ‘traditional’ sources of law in England and Wales: case law and statutes. Sections 2.4 and 2.5 consider the status and operation of EU and international law, including the potential effect of Brexit. Section 2.7 goes on to discuss public and private law, common law, and civil law, and other classifications used by lawyers. This is followed by a discussion of legal systems and their cultures across the world.


1947 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lauterpacht

The cause célèbre of King v. William Joyce, subsequently reported as Joyce v. Director of Public Prosecutions, was concerned to a large extent with matters of interest for international law, and it is mainly from this point of view that it is proposed to discuss it in the present article. Obviously the case is also of considerable importance both for criminal law, in so far as it is concerned with the crime of treason, and for constitutional law inasmuch as it bears directly on the question of the nature and the obligations of allegiance. However, it is probable that the case books which will claim it most insistently will be those of international law. For the decision in Rex v. Joyce is not only an authority on certain aspects of allegiance owed by aliens and of the right of a State to assume jurisdiction over acts committed by aliens abroad. It sheds light on such questions as the nature of diplomatic protection of citizens, the right of a State to protect diplomatically persons who are not its citizens, the obligation of allegiance of so-called protected persons, and some others. Not all these questions were judicially answered, but they loomed large in argument and imparted to the proceedings the complexion of a case concerned predominantly with international law. In view of this it may be pertinent to preface this article by drawing attention to a point which appears to be a mere matter of terminology but which, it is believed, raises an issue of wider significance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document