scholarly journals Updating ambiguous beliefs in a social learning experiment

Author(s):  
Roberta De Filippis ◽  
Antonio Guarino ◽  
Philippe Jehiel ◽  
Toru Kitagawa
2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 295-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Duffy ◽  
Ed Hopkins ◽  
Tatiana Kornienko ◽  
Mingye Ma

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Jehiel ◽  
Antonio Guarino ◽  
Marco Angrisani ◽  
Toru Kitagawa

2021 ◽  
pp. 105188
Author(s):  
Roberta De Filippis ◽  
Antonio Guarino ◽  
Philippe Jehiel ◽  
Toru Kitagawa

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-166
Author(s):  
Lukas Meub ◽  
Till Proeger ◽  
Hendrik Hüning

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-197
Author(s):  
Marco Angrisani ◽  
Antonio Guarino ◽  
Philippe Jehiel ◽  
Toru Kitagawa

We study social learning in a continuous action space experiment. Subjects, acting in sequence, state their beliefs about the value of a good after observing their predecessors’ statements and a private signal. We compare the behavior in the laboratory with the Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium prediction and the predictions of bounded rationality models of decision-making: the redundancy of information neglect model and the overconfidence model. The results of our experiment are in line with the predictions of the overconfidence model and at odds with the others’. (JEL C91, D12, D82, D83)


Author(s):  
Roberta De Filippis ◽  
Toru Kitagawa ◽  
Philippe Jehiel ◽  
Antonio Guarino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document