scholarly journals Análisis y optimización del nivel de servicio peatonal en la intersección de las Avenidas Garcilaso y Bolivia, Lima

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Yordi Urbano Flor Alva ◽  
◽  
César Hugo Toscano Mateo
Keyword(s):  
Research Program ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Garcilaso De La Vega ◽  
National Cooperative ◽  
Highway Research

El objetivo de la investigación es optimizar los niveles de servicio peatonal en la intersección de las avenidas Inca Garcilaso de la Vega y Bolivia debido a su alta incidencia de peatones. Realizando un análisis teórico y de campo, siguiendo procedimientos estandarizados por el Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010) y el National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP reporte 562). Los datos se recolectaron en el mes de septiembre del año 2019; realizando un aforo vehicular y peatonal durante 3 días de la misma semana; 14 horas por día. Se hizo el levantamiento topográfico para describir la geometría del lugar y realizar el inventario de las dimensiones de vías, ancho de esquinas, ancho de pasos peatonales, tiempos de semáforos, así como la señalización horizontal y vertical existente. Con los datos obtenidos en campo se calculó el nivel de servicio vehicular y peatonal (análisis de pasos peatonales y esquinas) para identificar el estado actual de la intersección en estudio. El nivel de servicio vehicular obtenido es F, para los pasos peatonales el nivel de servicio obtenido es F y para el estudio de esquinas el nivel de servicio obtenido es A, según el HCM 2010. Se identificar las mejoras que permitan optimizar el nivel de servicio peatonal. Como medida de solución se implementa un paso peatonal en forma “X”, modificaciones en los rebajes peatonales con pendientes adecuadas y postes de protección para peatones, lo cual permitirá una mayor fluidez y seguridad peatonal en la intersección analizada.

Investigation and MASH Full-Scale Crash Testing of the Buried-in-Backslope Terminal Compatible with Midwest Guardrail System

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110332
Author(s):  
Chiara Silvestri Dobrovolny ◽  
Roger Bligh ◽  
Maysam Kiani ◽  
Jeff Jeffers
Keyword(s):  
Research Program ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Terminal System ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Terminal Design ◽  
National Cooperative ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Highway Research

Buried-in-backslope (BIB) terminal designs for beam guardrails were developed under the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 criteria for 27¾-in. high guardrail systems. The design terminates a W-beam guardrail installation by burying the end terminal in the backslope. When properly designed and located, this type of anchor eliminates the possibility of an end-on impact with the barrier terminal and minimizes the likelihood of vehicular intrusion behind the barrier. Considering the increase in guardrail height to 31 in. in recent years, there is a need to modify the BIB terminal design for a 27¾-in. high guardrail to satisfy current crashworthiness standard criteria for a 31-in. high guardrail. The crash tests reported in this paper were performed in accordance with the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Tests 3-34 and 3-35 for non-gating terminals, which represent the tests considered necessary to demonstrate MASH compliance of the device. The TL-3 BIB terminal system met MASH requirements and is considered MASH compliant. It is considered suitable for implementation at V-ditch locations with a 4H:1V or flatter foreslope where a MASH TL-3 BIB terminal system is needed and/or desired.

Modeling Capacity of Through Movement at Signalized Intersection Affected by Short Left-Turn Bay under Different Signal Settings

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110064
Author(s):  
Zihang Wei ◽  
Yunlong Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyu Guo ◽  
Xin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cycle Length ◽  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Signalized Intersection ◽  
Essential Factor ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Left Turn ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Vehicle Demand ◽  
The One

Through movement capacity is an essential factor used to reflect intersection performance, especially for signalized intersections, where a large proportion of vehicle demand is making through movements. Generally, left-turn spillback is considered a key contributor to affect through movement capacity, and blockage to the left-turn bay is known to decrease left-turn capacity. Previous studies have focused primarily on estimating the through movement capacity under a lagging protected only left-turn (lagging POLT) signal setting, as a left-turn spillback is more likely to happen under such a condition. However, previous studies contained assumptions (e.g., omit spillback), or were dedicated to one specific signal setting. Therefore, in this study, through movement capacity models based on probabilistic modeling of spillback and blockage scenarios are established under four different signal settings (i.e., leading protected only left-turn [leading POLT], lagging left-turn, protected plus permitted left-turn, and permitted plus protected left-turn). Through microscopic simulations, the proposed models are validated, and compared with existing capacity models and the one in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The results of the comparisons demonstrate that the proposed models achieved significant advantages over all the other models and obtained high accuracies in all signal settings. Each proposed model for a given signal setting maintains consistent accuracy across various left-turn bay lengths. The proposed models of this study have the potential to serve as useful tools, for practicing transportation engineers, when determining the appropriate length of a left-turn bay with the consideration of spillback and blockage, and the adequate cycle length with a given bay length.

Assessment of Arterial Signal Timings Based on Various Operational Policies and Optimization Tools

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110111
Author(s):  
Suhaib Al Shayeb ◽  
Nemanja Dobrota ◽  
Aleksandar Stevanovic ◽  
Nikola Mitrovic
Keyword(s):  
Travel Time ◽  
Heavy Traffic ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Signal Timing ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Average Delay ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Simulation And Optimization ◽  
Fort Lauderdale ◽  
Design Engineers

Traffic simulation and optimization tools are classified, according to their practical applicability, into two main categories: theoretical and practical. The performance of the optimized signal timing derived by any tool is influenced by how calculations are executed in the particular tool. Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and Vistro implement the procedures defined in the Highway Capacity Manual, thus they are essentially utilized by traffic operations and design engineers. Considering its capability of timing diagram drafting and travel time collection studies, Tru-Traffic is more commonly used by practitioners. All these programs have different built-in objective function(s) to develop optimized signal plans for intersections. In this study, the performance of the optimal signal timing plans developed by HCS, Tru-Traffic, and Vistro are evaluated and compared by using the microsimulation software Vissim. A real-world urban arterial with 20 intersections and heavy traffic in Fort Lauderdale, Florida served as the testbed. To eliminate any bias in the comparisons, all experiments were performed under identical geometric and traffic conditions, coded in each tool. The evaluation of the optimized plans was conducted based on average delay, number of stops, performance index, travel time, and percentage of arrivals on green. Results indicated that although timings developed in HCS reduced delay, they drastically increased number of stops. Tru-Traffic signal timings, when only offsets are optimized, performed better than timings developed by all of the other tools. Finally, Vistro increased arrivals on green, but it also increased delay. Optimized signal plans were transferred manually from optimization tools to Vissim. Therefore, future research should find methods for automatically transferring optimized plans to Vissim.

Estimating the Effects of Urban Street Incidents on Capacity

2017 ◽  
Vol 2615 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidin Massahi ◽  
Mohammed Hadi ◽  
Maria Adriana Cutillo ◽  
Yan Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Network Performance ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Signalized Intersection ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Microscopic Simulation ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Urban Streets ◽  
Urban Street ◽  
Incident Duration

The effect of incidents on capacity is the most critical parameter in estimating the influence of incidents on network performance. The Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (HCM 2010) provides estimates of the drop in capacity resulting from incidents as a function of the number of blocked lanes and the total number of lanes in the freeway section. However, there is limited information on the effects of incidents on the capacity of urban streets. This study investigated the effects on capacity of the interaction between the drop in capacity below demand at a midblock urban street segment location and upstream and downstream of signalized intersection operations. A model was developed to estimate the drop in capacity at the incident location as a function of the number of blocked lanes, the distance from the downstream intersection, and the green time–to–cycle length (g:C) ratio of the downstream signal. A second model was developed to estimate the reduction in the upstream intersection capacity resulting from the drop in capacity at the midblock incident location as estimated by the first model. The second model estimated the drop in capacity of the upstream links feeding the incident locations as a function of incident duration time, the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio at the incident location, and distance from an upstream signalized intersection. The models were developed on the basis of data generated with the use of a microscopic simulation model calibrated by comparison with parameters suggested in HCM 2010 for incident and no-incident conditions and by comparison with field measurements.

Application of Moving Car Observer Method for Measuring Free Flow Speed on Two-lane Highways

2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Othman Che Puan ◽  
Muttaka Na’iya Ibrahim ◽  
Usman Tasiu Abdurrahman
Keyword(s):  
Field Measurement ◽  
Flow Speed ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Free Flow ◽  
Geometric Features ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Free Flow Speed ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Low Traffic

There exists a need to evaluate the performance indicator that reflects the current level of service (LOS) of the subject facility to justify any decision making on expenditures to be made for improving the performance level of a road facility. Free-flow speed (FFS) is one of the key parameters associated with LOS assessment for two-lane highways. Application of a more realistic approach for assessing road’s performance indicators would result in better estimates which could in turn suggest the most appropriate decision to be made (for situations where upgrading is needed); especially, in terms of finance, materials and human resources. FFS is the driver’s desired speed at low traffic volume condition and in the absence of traffic control devices. Its estimation is significant in the analysis of two-lane highways through which average travel speed (ATS); an LOS indicator for the subject road class is determined. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 offers an indirect method for field estimation of FSS based on the highway operating conditions in terms of base-free-flow-speed (BFFS). It is however, recommended by the same manual that direct field FSS measurement approach is most preferred. The Malaysian Highway Capacity Manual (MHCM) established a model for estimating FFS based on BFFS, the geometric features of the highway and proportion of motorcycles in the traffic stream. Estimating FFS based on BFFS is regarded as an indirect approach which is only resorted to, if direct field measurement proved difficult or not feasible. This paper presents the application of moving car observer (MCO) method for direct field measurement of FFS. Data for the study were collected on six segments of two-lane highways with varying geometric features. FFS estimates from MCO method were compared with those based on MHCM model. Findings from the study revealed that FFS values from MCO method seem to be consistently lower than those based on MHCM model. To ascertain the extent of the difference between the FFS values from the two approaches, student t-statistics was used. The t-statistics revealed a P–value of less than 0.05 (P < 0.05) which implies that there is a statistically significant difference between the two sets of data. Since MCO method was conducted under low traffic flow (most desired condition for field observation), it can be suggested that MCO estimates of FFS represent the actual scenario. A relationship was therefore developed between the estimates from the two methods. Thus, if the MHCM model is to be applied, the measured value needs to be adjusted based on the relationship developed between the two approaches.

Validation Results for Four Models of Oversaturated Freeway Facilities

2000 ◽  
Vol 1710 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred L. Hall ◽  
Loren Bloomberg ◽  
Nagui M. Rouphail ◽  
Brian Eads ◽  
Adolf D. May
Keyword(s):  
Field Data ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual

Some researchers have noted that the current procedures in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) may not be appropriate for analyzing complex or oversaturated freeway facilities. The results of a comparison of an HCM-based procedure with field data from six such freeway sites are reported. Because simulation has often been suggested as an alternative to the HCM for oversaturated freeway facilities, three simulation models (CORSIM, FREQ, and INTEGRATION) were also used to analyze these same six sites. The results suggest that the HCM-based procedures do as well as the three simulation models in reproducing the average speeds across the freeway facilities.

Uncertainty in Operational Analysis of Two-Lane Highways

2002 ◽  
Vol 1802 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tapio Luttinen
Keyword(s):  
Input Data ◽  
Travel Speed ◽  
Level Of Service ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Operational Analysis ◽  
Percent Time ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Percent Time Spent Following

The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 provides methods to estimate performance measures and the level of service for different types of traffic facilities. Because neither the input data nor the model parameters are totally accurate, there is an element of uncertainty in the results. An analytical method was used to estimate the uncertainty in the service measures of two-lane highways. The input data and the model parameters were considered as random variables. The propagation of error through the arithmetic operations in the HCM 2000 methodology was estimated. Finally, the uncertainty in the average travel speed and percent time spent following was analyzed, and four approaches were considered to deal with uncertainty in the level of service.

Validation of Generalized Delay Model for Vehicle-Actuated Traffic Signals

1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagui M. Rouphail ◽  
Mohammad Anwar ◽  
Daniel B. Fambro ◽  
Paul Sloup ◽  
Cesar E. Perez
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Traffic Signals ◽  
Signalized Intersections ◽  
Delay Model ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Generalized Model ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Traffic Volumes ◽  
Isolated Intersection

One limitation of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) model for estimating delay at signalized intersections is its inadequate treatment of vehicle-actuated traffic signals. For example, the current delay model uses a single adjustment for all types of actuated control and is not sensitive to changes in actuated controller settings. The objective in this paper was to use TRAF-NETSIM and field data to evaluate a generalized delay model developed to overcome some of these deficiencies. NETSIM was used to estimate delay at an isolated intersection under actuated control, and the delay values obtained from NETSIM were then compared with those estimated by the generalized delay model. In addition, field data were collected from sites in North Carolina, and delays observed in the field were compared with those estimated by the generalized delay model. The delays estimated by the generalized model were comparable with the delays estimated by NETSIM. The data compared favorably for degrees of saturation of less than 0.8. However, at higher degrees of saturation, the generalized model produced delays that were higher than NETSIM’s. Some possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed. The delays estimated by the generalized model were comparable with delays observed in the field. Researchers have concluded that the generalized delay model is sensitive to changes in traffic volumes and vehicle-actuated controller settings and that the generalized delay model is much improved over the current HCM model in estimating delay at vehicle-actuated traffic signals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document