Nila Firdausi Nuzula and Chitra Sriyani De Silva Lokuwaduge. Do ownership structures really matter? A study of companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nila Firdausi Nuzula ◽  
Chitra Sriyani De Silva Lokuwaduge
Keyword(s):  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Ownership Structures

scholarly journals DETERMINAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE (CSRD) PADA PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN PERIODE 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-131
Author(s):  
Maria Suryaningsih ◽  
Mulia Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This research has a problem where the company implements corporate social responsibility with the existence of a law, not from awareness. Companies are also not yet aware of the benefits of implementing corporate social responsibility and there are still different previous researchers.This study aims to examine the effect of profitability, leverage, and ownership structure on corporate social responsibility. This study uses data from 15 mining companies listed on the Stock Exchange Index (IDX) during the period 2014 to 2018 using SPSS 24 software. The results showed that profitability had no effect on corporate social responsibility . Leverage has no effect on corporate social responsibility . Ownership Structure has a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility . That is, high institutional ownership can increase the existence of corporate social responsibility actions and Simultaneously Profitability, Leverage and ownership structures simultaneously have a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility .

scholarly journals Struktur kepemilikan saham terhadap profitabilitas dan nilai pada perusahaan perbankan

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Surayya Surayya ◽  
Juliana Kadang
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Exchange ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Public Ownership ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Share Ownership ◽  
Share Ownership Structure

This study aims to determine the effect of managerial and public ownership structures on profitability at the Foreign Exchange National Private Commercial Banks (BUSN), determine the effect of managerial and public ownership structures on firm value at Foreign Exchange National Private Commercial Banks (BUSN), and determine the effect of profitability on firm value in Foreign Exchange National Private Commercial Banks (BUSN). This research method uses descriptive quantitative as a type of research. The population is 35 banking companies, while the sample is 17 banking companies whose financial statements are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The date were collected through secondary data in the form of documents, namely financial reports for 2016 - 2018. The data analysis technique uses multiple regression analysis. The results showed that there was no influence of managerial share ownership structure on profitability and firm value. Furthermore, there is a significant effect of public share ownership structure on profitability while firm value has no significant effect. The implication is that managerial roles and participation are needed in this case the share ownership structure in order to increase the profitability and value of banking companies such as other companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.

scholarly journals OWNERSHIP STRUCTURES, INVESTORS CONFIDENCE AND FINANCIAL DECISIONS IN FAMILY FIRMS: EVIDENCE FROM GCC MARKETS

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-68
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sadiq Shahid ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Investment Funds ◽  
Financial Decisions ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Impact

The objective of this study is to examine the impact of financial decisions on the ownership structure. This study adopted two themes of ownership structure (e.g., 25% & 50%) that categorized the family-owned firms (FOF) and non-family firms (NFOF). The data was collected from 286 firms listed at GCC stock exchanges annual reports, stock exchange database, and Data Stream that range from 2010-2016 periods. The findings of this study showed that the FOFs have lesser investment-internal fund sensitivity than NFOFs. Though, there is an insignificant effect of the block holder on investment funds sensitivity. However, the little implication of dividend payout in FOFs as compare to NFOFs was disclosed in the results. Moreover, it wrapped up that there are less agency problems and information asymmetry in FOFs comparatively.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE TO DIVIDEND POLICY IN COMPANIES IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Farah Margaretha
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Payout Policy ◽  
Family Ownership ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
Government Ownership ◽  
Private Companies ◽  
Dividend Payout ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Study Results

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of ownership structure on dividend payout policy in companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. In this study, there are 4 kinds of ownership structures that will be discussed, namely private ownership structure, government ownership structure, foreign ownerships structure and family ownership structure. Dividend payout policy uses DividndPayout Ratio (DPR) indicator Population of this study is all the companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) 009-2011. Total samples in this study are 85 companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange determined by purposive sampling.  Based on the study results, from the four ownership structures, only the private ownership structure influence Parliament. The implication for investors in doing this research, the investor can choose the private ownership structure of companies. for financial managers, this study provides information specifically on private companies that one way the companies reduce the agency problem could use dividend payout policy

scholarly journals Determinants of Indonesian Public Listed Companies to Participate in the Tax Amnesty

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Arie Pratama
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Control Variable ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Exploratory Research ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
Logistic Regressions

This exploratory research paper would investigate several motivations factors that drive the Indonesian public companies to participate in the Tax Amnesty program. The factors were divided into three: Tax Avoidance, Ownership Structures, and Corporate Governance. We also used profitability, size, and age as a control variable. The data collected from public companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. The data will be taken from 2011–2016 companies’ financial statement. There was 135 sample selected using purposive sampling. To analyze the results, we will use binary logistic regressions. The results showed that all the variables mentioned have significant influence toward company's decision to join tax amnesty. The research showed that companies’ decision to participate in Tax Amnesty contribute by many factors, however, in each of the factors, there are different views and perspectives.

scholarly journals The Effect of IAS-24 Disclosures on Governance Mechanisms and Ownership Structures in Pakistan

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-36
Author(s):  
Abdul Rafay Abdul Rafay ◽  
Ramla Sadiq ◽  
Mobeen Ajmal
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
The Impact

IAS-24 of the International Financial Reporting Standards focuses on the concept and disclosures of related party transactions (RPTs) for a reporting entity. This study examines the interrelationship between RPTs (as disclosed under IAS-24), agency theory, ownership structures and firm performance. Our sample includes nonfinancial companies indexed by the KSE-100 of the Pakistan Stock Exchange during 2006–15. To run the regression models, we determine the regression assumptions, normality, heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation and multicollinearity. We investigate the impact of different RPTs, including cash inflows and outflows, whereas other studies generally look at the impact of RPTs on firm performance in totality. The empirical analysis suggests that institutional ownership has a positive, significant impact on firm performance. Related party purchases have a significant, negative impact on performance, resulting in the expropriation of institutional ownership. RPTs that generate revenues have a significant, positive impact on performance, such that institutional ownership has a propping-up effect with respect to the related parties. In practice, institutional ownership leads to strong corporate governance and contributes to firm performance. While other studies find family ownership responsible for the expropriation effect, we argue that institutional ownership has a propping-up and expropriation effect on related parties. Our study also suggests that certain ownership structures lead to weaker corporate governance mechanisms, resulting in greater agency problems. This, in turn, badly affects company performance and leads to the exploitation of minority shareholders.

scholarly journals Does ownership structure affect firm performance? Evidence from Nigerian listed companies

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 503-513
Author(s):  
Ioraver N. Tsegba ◽  
Joseph K. Achua
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Insider Ownership ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Concentrated Ownership ◽  
The Relationship

This paper examines the relationship between ownership structure and firm performance from the perspective of listed Nigerian companies. The sample comprises 73 companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange for which relevant financial data is available for the period 2001 to 2007. The empirical results obtained through ordinary least squares (OLS) analysis provide evidence which suggests that dominant shareholding, ownership concentration, and foreign ownership structures have no significant effect on firm performance. However, insider ownership is inversely related to firm performance. Two major policy implications emerge from the results of this study. First, since ownership structures such as, dominant shareholding, concentrated ownership, and foreign ownership have no significant effect on firm performance, government emphasis on them is misplaced. Second, insider ownership of Nigerian firms is to be monitored closely by shareholders due to the adverse effect of this ownership structure on firm performance.

scholarly journals The moderating effect of shareholder features on dividend disbursement: evidence from Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Novi Swandari Budiarso ◽  
Winston Pontoh
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
State Ownership ◽  
Moderating Effect ◽  
Single Individual ◽  
Public Ownership ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Basic Features

The objective of this study is to give an empirical evidence of relationship between features of ownership structures and dividend disbursement in context of bird in the hand and catering theories. The study uses 241 listed firms as the sample, which were drawn from Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period from 2010 to 2015. Under condition that dividend policy is not moderated by ownership features, dividend policy for firms with multi-institutional, single institutional, and state are fit in context of bird in the hand theory and catering theory. Under condition that dividend policy is moderated by ownership features, this study finds that dividend policy for firms with state ownership is not fit both in context of bird in the hand theory and catering theory. Specifically, the study finds that firms with features of: (1) multi-institutional, single individual, and public; (2) multi-institutional, multi-individual, and public; and (3) single institutional, and public are fit with bird in the hand theory. Furthermore, this study finds that catering theory is not fit for firms with basic features of multi-institutional and state ownership, but it is fit for firms with features of single institutional, single individual, and public ownership.

STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN DAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN: (STUDI PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG LISTING DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA)

Jurnal Varian ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-49
Author(s):  
Restu Fahdiansyah ◽  
Jihadil Qudsi ◽  
Adam Bachtiar
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Agency Problems ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Shareholder Wealth ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Company Value

The purpose of company management in general is to generate profit, but furthermore the management of the company is required to improve the welfare of the owners of the company or in this case the shareholders. To achieve these objectives, it is necessary to have ownership structures that can provide maximum supervision to managers in order to carry out their duties to improve the welfare of the owners of the company through increasing the value of the company. This is in accordance with the agency theory developed by Jensen Meckling stating that the manager as an agent delegated by the owner of the company to manage the company. In the process of managing the company, according to Jensen Meckling there is possible occurrence of agency problems, which arise because of the tendency of managers to not always make decisions that aim to meet the interests of principals or owners of the company to the fullest. To align the interests of managers and owners of the company so as to reduce agency problems, it is necessary to have a good ownership structure, capable of monitoring the performance of management in meeting the interests of the owner of the company. Therefore, this study would like to examine how ownership structures proxied with institutional ownership and managerial ownership can influence the value of firms that can ultimately have an impact on increasing shareholder wealth. This study tested 71 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2016 using multiple regression analysis techniques. The test results show the significant influence of variables with institutional ownership and managerial ownership of firm value, which shows that the ownership structure that allows the owner of the company to supervise the performance of the company's management can have an impact on the increase of company value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document