scholarly journals Creating A Process To Design A Capstone Program That Considers Stakeholder Values

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Todd ◽  
Spencer Magleby
Keyword(s):  
Stakeholder Values

A Value Focused Thinking Approach to Decommissioning Decision Making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Tung
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Stakeholder Values ◽  
A Value ◽  
Value Focused Thinking ◽  
Science Theory ◽  
Past Experiences ◽  
Stakeholder Acceptance

Abstract Values are what stakeholders regard to be important to decisions (Kruglanski & Higgins 2007). How stakeholder prioritize, rank, balance, and trade-off values can have significant influence on their reasoning and evaluation of decommissioning outcomes and decisions. Stakeholder values can vary depending on various factors including religious beliefs, personal interests, and past experiences (Lechner et al., 2017). Value-focused thinking is a decision science theory developed by Keeney (1992) which builds upon the concept of varying stakeholder values. Keeney (1992) argues that the best decision is one that best reflects the actual values of stakeholders. which suggests that the acceptability of decommissioning decisions (full removal, partial removal, leave in-situ, rigs-to-reefs, etc.) by stakeholders will vary depending on the values of stakeholder in that particular context. This paper explores the idea of value-focused thinking and derive implications for decommissioning decision-making. Overall, the research finding suggests that rather than basing a decommissioning decision solely on scientific evidence, there is also a need for the decommissioning decisions to be able to reflect the actual values of stakeholders in that particular context. The criteria and weightage of the adopted multi-criteria decision analysis tool, for example, should accurately represent the actual values of stakeholders, so as to enable the tool to produce outcomes and decisions that has a higher probability of stakeholder acceptance.

scholarly journals Green Procurement for Construction Project: The Roles of Stakeholder Values

2018 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 012024
Author(s):  
Munira Mohd Saferi ◽  
Asmah Alia Mohamad Bohari ◽  
Zafikha Aida Bidin ◽  
Syamimi Liyana Amat Rais
Keyword(s):  
Construction Project ◽  
Stakeholder Values ◽  
Green Procurement

scholarly journals Policy recommendations for Open Access to research data in Europe – Stakeholder values and ecosystems

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 331-333
Author(s):  
Thordis Sveinsdottir ◽  
Bridgette A. Wessels ◽  
Rod Smallwood ◽  
Peter Linde ◽  
Vasso Kala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Policy Recommendations ◽  
Stakeholder Values

Evaluation of land-use planning in greenbelts based on intrinsic characteristics and stakeholder values

2012 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Fitzsimons ◽  
Craig J. Pearson ◽  
Christopher Lawson ◽  
Michael J. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Land Use Planning ◽  
Stakeholder Values

Investors' Responses to Social Conflict between CSR and Corporate Tax Avoidance

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-72
Author(s):  
David J. Emerson ◽  
Ling Yang ◽  
Ruilian Xu
Keyword(s):  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Stakeholder Values ◽  
Area Of Interest ◽  
Joint Influence ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Investment Intentions

ABSTRACT There is often conflict between disclosures and actions in corporate operations. One area of interest relates to the joint influence of tax avoidance and Corporate Social Responsibility on economic outcomes. We evaluate investor perceptions when these corporate behaviors are in conflict, and our results indicate that tax avoidance negatively influences investment decisions. We find that although CSR in isolation has no direct effect, the negative influence of tax avoidance is tempered when it is present. We provide evidence that not only do a firm's policies related to CSR and tax avoidance result in diverse investment intentions, but also that it is the individual's unique beliefs on ethics and CSR that appear to be driving these differences. Our results suggest that espousing stakeholder values serves as a shield to protect the company from the negative consequences associated with tax avoidance, and that individual attitudes can shape perceptions relative to these behaviors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document