Effect of Pancreatic Duct Stent Diameter on Hospitalization in Chronic Pancreatits: A Retrospective Analysis

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Gordon Sauer
2010 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. S60
Author(s):  
Vishal Jain ◽  
Eileen Gagliardi ◽  
Abraham Mathew ◽  
Thomas McGarrity ◽  
Nakechand Pooran

Pancreas ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 728-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan G. Sauer ◽  
Matthew J. Gurka ◽  
Kristi Ellen ◽  
Vanessa M. Shami ◽  
Michel Kahaleh

2008 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. S70
Author(s):  
Bryan Sauer ◽  
Matthew Gurka ◽  
Kristi Ellen ◽  
Vanessa Shami ◽  
Michel Kahaleh

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (06) ◽  
pp. E888-E894
Author(s):  
Nichol S. Martinez ◽  
Sumant Inamdar ◽  
Sheila N. Firoozan ◽  
Stephanie Izard ◽  
Calvin Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims There are conflicting data regarding the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) compared to polyethylene stents (PS) in malignant biliary obstructions and limited data related to benign obstructions. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was performed of 1136 patients who underwent ERCP for biliary obstruction and received SEMS or PS at a tertiary-care medical center between January 2011 and October 2016. We evaluated the association between stent type (SEMS vs PS) and PEP in malignant and benign biliary obstructions. Results Among the 1136 patients included in our study, 399 had SEMS placed and 737 had PS placed. Patients with PS were more likely to have pancreatic duct cannulation, pancreatic duct stent placement, double guidewire technique, sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty as compared to the SEMS group. On multivariate analysis, PEP rates were higher in the SEMS group (8.0 %) versus the PS group (4.8 %) (OR 2.27 [CI, 1.22, 4.24]) for all obstructions. For malignant obstructions, PEP rates were 7.8 % and 6.6 % for SEMS and plastic stents, respectively (OR 1.54 [CI, 0.72, 3.30]). For benign obstructions the PEP rate was higher in the SEMS group (8.8 %) compared to the PS group (4.2 %) (OR 3.67 [CI, 1.50, 8.97]). No significant differences between PEP severity were identified based on stent type when stratified based on benign and malignant. Conclusions PEP rates were higher when SEMS were used for benign obstruction as compared to PS. For malignant obstruction, no difference was identified in PEP rates with use of SEMS vs PS.


2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. AB185
Author(s):  
Evan L. Fogel ◽  
Stuart Sherman ◽  
Benedict M. Devereaux ◽  
Rungsun Rerknimitr ◽  
Susan D. Phillips ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB212
Author(s):  
Tomotaka Saito ◽  
Yousuke Nakai ◽  
Suguru Mizuno ◽  
Akiyuki Inokuma ◽  
Yukari Suzuki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1139-S-1140
Author(s):  
Vivek Kumbhari ◽  
John Hauschild ◽  
Courtney Flynn ◽  
Jianying Zhang ◽  
Venkata S. Akshintala

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Mustafa S Ascha ◽  
Mona Ascha ◽  
Ibrahim Hanouneh

Introduction: Common causes of ascites include liver cirrhosis, heart failure, and malignancy. Pancreatic etiology is lesscommon for ascites, but is most often a result of chronic pancreatitis secondary to alcoholic liver damage or pancreatic duct leak.Case description: The following case describes a patient with black-colored ascites secondary to pancreatic duct leak after totalcolectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. The colectomy was indicated by MYH-positive polyposis, and the there was no knownprior liver or pancreas disease. Management included pancreatic duct stent placement, and drains from the pancreatic tail.Discussion: Pancreatic etiology is rare among ascites diagnoses; this case is even rarer due to gross appearance of the asciticfluid and its iatrogenic cause.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document