scholarly journals Pakistan on FATFs Grey List: Terrorist Financing Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol IV (IV) ◽  
pp. 281-290
Author(s):  
Abid Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Financial System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Multiple Sources ◽  
Financial Action Task Force ◽  
Terrorist Financing ◽  
Terrorist Groups ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Financing Of Terrorism

Pakistan is facing great challenges of terrorism which have posed serious threats towards integrity and stability of the country. It is unanimously agreed that finance serves as lifeline for execution of terrorist activities. Terrorist groups generate funds through multiple sources and transfer them by exploiting the loopholes existing in financial system. Despite, Pakistan has taken sufficient steps to counter the financing of terrorism (CFT), nonetheless, money is still transmitting due to some regulatory flaws of the financial system. Owing to terrorist financing related deficiencies, Pakistan has been placed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) “Grey list”. FATF has warned Pakistan to be blacklisted if precipitate actions to address TF related deficiencies are not taken until February 2020. The paper evaluates the present CFT legal framework and recommends certain legal initiatives required to be taken by Pakistan prior dead line of February 2020.

Who's the Legislator Anyway? How the Fatf's Global Norms Reshape Australian Counter Terrorist Financing Laws

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doron Goldbarsht
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Soft Law ◽  
Evaluation Report ◽  
Financial Action Task Force ◽  
Terrorist Financing ◽  
Decisive Influence ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Global Norms ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

This article focuses on the Australian implementation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations, so-called ‘soft law’ instruments, which represent the international standards in Counter Terrorist Financing (CTF) but which force legislators to conform. The article will fill the gaps existing in the literature today by focusing on the origins and motives of broad CTF legislation in Australia, then detailing each of the FATF's CTF Recommendations and the ways in which they are implemented in Australia. This approach differs significantly from other literature in the field, which deals solely with Australian implementation of one of the FATF's components. The current paper's examination will reveal the CTF regime in Australia, a decade after the FATF's first CTF Mutual Evaluation Report on Australia, and its decisive influence.

Soft Organizations, Hard Powers: The FATF and the FSB as Standard-Setting Bodies

Global Jurist ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara De Vido
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Standard Setting ◽  
Financial Action Task Force ◽  
Financial Action Task

Abstract The purpose of this contribution is to analyze two major standard setting bodies, namely the Financial Action Task Force on money laundering and the Financial Stability Board from an international law perspective. It will be demonstrated that they are “soft organizations”, which, despite their loose structure, can exercise “hard powers” in inducing States to comply with their standards.

Part II Public Obligations and Regulatory Responsibilities, B Sanctions and Regulatory Responsibilities, 10 Regulatory Responsibilities

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent Richard
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Financial Action Task Force ◽  
Obvious Advantage ◽  
The Third ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
English Law ◽  
Direct Incorporation ◽  
Incorporation Method

This chapter looks at the Money Laundering (ML) Regulations of 2007. These regulations implement both the Third Money Laundering Directive and the first implementing directive of the EC Commission. For the most part, the ML Regulations 2007 adopt the ‘copy-out’ or ‘direct incorporation’ method of transposing the Community measures into English law. This means that there is a verbatim transposition of the provisions of the directive into national law. This has an obvious advantage and difficulty. The advantage is that it ensures that all of the provisions of the directive are transposed into English law. The difficulty is that it can create uncertainty. That is to say, it removes from the domestic legislature the responsibility for interpreting Community concepts in an English law context and instead imposes that burden on individuals who have to decide how these measures are to be applied in practice. The chapter also looks at the Financial Action Task Force (FAFT) recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document