Stable Stress‐Drop Measurements and their Variability: Implications for Ground‐Motion Prediction

2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie S. Baltay ◽  
Thomas C. Hanks ◽  
Gregory C. Beroza
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction

Generic Source Parameter Determination and Ground-Motion Prediction for Earthquake Early Warning

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itzhak Lior ◽  
Alon Ziv
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Seismic Moment ◽  
Source Parameter ◽  
Parameter Determination ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Empirical Relations

ABSTRACT Currently available earthquake early warning systems employ region-specific empirical relations for magnitude determination and ground-motion prediction. Consequently, the setting up of such systems requires lengthy calibration and parameter tuning. This situation is most problematic in low seismicity and/or poorly instrumented regions, where the data available for inferring those empirical relations are scarce. To address this issue, a generic approach for real-time magnitude, stress drop, and ground-motion prediction is introduced that is based on the omega-squared model. This approach leads to the following approximate expressions for seismic moment: M0∝RT0.5Drms1.5/Vrms0.5, and stress drop: Δτ∝RT0.5Arms3/Vrms2, in which R is the hypocentral distance; T is the data interval; and Drms, Vrms, and Arms are the displacement, velocity, and acceleration root mean squares, respectively, which may be calculated in the time domain. The potential of these relations for early warning applications is demonstrated using a large composite data set that includes the two 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes. A quality parameter is introduced that identifies inconsistent earthquake magnitude and stress-drop estimates. Once initial estimates of the seismic moment and stress drop become available, the peak ground velocity and acceleration may be estimated in real time using the generic ground-motion prediction equation of Lior and Ziv (2018). The use of stress drop for ground-motion prediction is shown to be critical for strong ground accelerations. The main advantages of the generic approach with respect to the empirical approach are that it is readily implementable in any seismic region, allows for the easy update of magnitude, stress drop, and shaking intensity with time, and uses source parameter determination and peak ground motion predictions that are subject to the same model assumptions, thus constituting a self-consistent early warning method.

When Source and Path Components Trade-Off in Ground-Motion Prediction Equations

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 2259-2267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie S. Baltay ◽  
Lauren S. Abrahams ◽  
Thomas C. Hanks
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction Equations ◽  
Prediction Equations ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Motion Models ◽  
Ground Motion Models

Abstract Current research on ground-motion models (also known as ground-motion prediction equations [GMPEs]) and their uncertainties focus on the separate contributions of source, path, and site to both median values and their variability. Implicit here is the assumption that the event term, path term, and site term reflect only properties of the source, path, and site, respectively. Events with larger stress drop generate more high-frequency energy, and thus more ground motion. Therefore, the correlation of high-frequency (i.e., peak ground acceleration [PGA] or peak ground velocity [PGV]) event terms in GMPEs with stress drop is taken to be genuine. However, PGA and PGV ground-motion observations of the 2014 M 6.0 South Napa, California, earthquake clearly violate these assumptions. For this earthquake, high-frequency ground-motion residuals of recorded ground motion with respect to Next Generation Attenuation-West2 Project (NGA-West2) ground-motion models show a dependence on distance, biasing the calculation of the event term by incorrectly mapping a regional attenuation effect into it. We examine the trade-off between source and path effects for the South Napa earthquake and a well-recorded California subset of the NGA-West2 data. We fit near-source (i.e., within 20 or 50 km) event terms and remaining differential geometrical spreading and anelastic attenuation terms in comparison to a simultaneous inversion for the source and path terms. This South Napa instance highlights one situation for which the high-frequency event term can be interpreted as relative stress drop only when the distance dependence of the ground motions does not bias the residuals.

scholarly journals Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Malaysia Due to Subduction Zone Earthquakes in Sumatran Region

IEEE Access ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 23920-23937
Author(s):  
M. S. Liew ◽  
Kamaluddeen Usman Danyaro ◽  
Mazlina Mohamad ◽  
Lim Eu Shawn ◽  
Aziz Aulov
Keyword(s):  
Subduction Zone ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction Equations ◽  
Prediction Equations ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Ground-motion model for subduction earthquakes in northern South America

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110275
Author(s):  
Carlos A Arteta ◽  
Cesar A Pajaro ◽  
Vicente Mercado ◽  
Julián Montejo ◽  
Mónica Arcila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South America ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Depth Range ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Natural Period ◽  
Nazca Plate ◽  
Northern South America

Subduction ground motions in northern South America are about a factor of 2 smaller than the ground motions for similar events in other regions. Nevertheless, historical and recent large-interface and intermediate-depth slab earthquakes of moment magnitudes Mw = 7.8 (Ecuador, 2016) and 7.2 (Colombia, 2012) evidenced the vast potential damage that vulnerable populations close to earthquake epicenters could experience. This article proposes a new empirical ground-motion prediction model for subduction events in northern South America, a regionalization of the global AG2020 ground-motion prediction equations. An updated ground-motion database curated by the Colombian Geological Survey is employed. It comprises recordings from earthquakes associated with the subduction of the Nazca plate gathered by the National Strong Motion Network in Colombia and by the Institute of Geophysics at Escuela Politécnica Nacional in Ecuador. The regional terms of our model are estimated with 539 records from 60 subduction events in Colombia and Ecuador with epicenters in the range of −0.6° to 7.6°N and 75.5° to 79.6°W, with Mw≥4.5, hypocentral depth range of 4 ≤  Zhypo ≤ 210 km, for distances up to 350 km. The model includes forearc and backarc terms to account for larger attenuation at backarc sites for slab events and site categorization based on natural period. The proposed model corrects the median AG2020 global model to better account for the larger attenuation of local ground motions and includes a partially non-ergodic variance model.

scholarly journals Ground motions in urban Los Angeles from the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110039
Author(s):  
Filippos Filippitzis ◽  
Monica D Kohler ◽  
Thomas H Heaton ◽  
Robert W Graves ◽  
Robert W Clayton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Earthquake Sequence ◽  
Motion Prediction ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction Equations ◽  
Prediction Equations ◽  
Ground Motion Prediction ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Spectral Accelerations

We study ground-motion response in urban Los Angeles during the two largest events (M7.1 and M6.4) of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence using recordings from multiple regional seismic networks as well as a subset of 350 stations from the much denser Community Seismic Network. In the first part of our study, we examine the observed response spectral (pseudo) accelerations for a selection of periods of engineering significance (1, 3, 6, and 8 s). Significant ground-motion amplification is present and reproducible between the two events. For the longer periods, coherent spectral acceleration patterns are visible throughout the Los Angeles Basin, while for the shorter periods, the motions are less spatially coherent. However, coherence is still observable at smaller length scales due to the high spatial density of the measurements. Examining possible correlations of the computed response spectral accelerations with basement depth and Vs30, we find the correlations to be stronger for the longer periods. In the second part of the study, we test the performance of two state-of-the-art methods for estimating ground motions for the largest event of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence, namely three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference simulations and ground motion prediction equations. For the simulations, we are interested in the performance of the two Southern California Earthquake Center 3D community velocity models (CVM-S and CVM-H). For the ground motion prediction equations, we consider four of the 2014 Next Generation Attenuation-West2 Project equations. For some cases, the methods match the observations reasonably well; however, neither approach is able to reproduce the specific locations of the maximum response spectral accelerations or match the details of the observed amplification patterns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document