scholarly journals Variability of Near-Field Ground Motion from Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Simulations

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 1207-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ripperger ◽  
P. M. Mai ◽  
J.-P. Ampuero
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Earthquake Rupture

Near-Real-Time Estimates on Earthquake Rupture Directivity Using Near-Field Ground Motion Data From a Dense Low-Cost Seismic Network

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (15) ◽  
pp. 7496-7503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyh Cherng Jan ◽  
Hsin-Hua Huang ◽  
Yih-Min Wu ◽  
Chien-Chih Chen ◽  
Cheng-Horng Lin
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Earthquake Rupture ◽  
Rupture Directivity ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Time Estimates

Strain, tilt, and rotation associated with strong ground motion in the vicinity of earthquake faults

1982 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1717-1738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Bouchon ◽  
Keiiti Aki
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Rotational Velocity ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Phase Velocities ◽  
Crustal Structures ◽  
Time Histories ◽  
San Fernando ◽  
Earthquake Faults ◽  
Strong Ground

abstract In the absence of near-field records of differential ground motion induced by earthquakes, we simulate the time histories of strain, tilt, and rotation in the vicinity of earthquake faults embedded in layered media. We consider the case of both strike-slip and dip-slip fault models and study the effect of different crustal structures. The maximum rotational motion produced by a buried 30-km-long strike-slip fault with slip of 1 m is of the order of 3 × 10−4 rad while the corresponding rotational velocity is about 1.5 × 10−3 rad/sec. A simulation of the San Fernando earthquake yields maximum longitudinal strain and tilt a few kilometers from the fault of the order of 8 × 10−4 and 7 × 10−4 rad. These values being small compared to the amplitude of ground displacement, the results suggest that most of the damage occurring in earthquakes is caused by translation motions. We also show that strain and tilt are closely related to ground velocity and that the phase velocities associated with strong ground motions are controlled by the rupture velocity and the basement rock shearwave velocity.

scholarly journals Near-Field Ground Motion Modal versus Wave Propagation Analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 611-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artur Cichowicz
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Strong Ground Motion ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Spectral Characteristics ◽  
Beam Model ◽  
Drift Spectrum ◽  
Localized Deformation ◽  
Dominant Period ◽  
Strong Ground

The response spectrum generally provides a good estimate of the global displacement and acceleration demand of far-field ground motion on a structure. However, it does not provide accurate information on the local shape or internal deformation of the response of the structure. Near-field pulse-like ground motion will propagate through the structure as waves, causing large, localized deformation. Therefore, the response spectrum alone is not a sufficient representation of near-field ground motion features. Results show that the drift-response technique based on a continuous shear-beam model has to be employed here to estimate structure-demand parameters when structure is exposed to the pulse like ground motion. Conduced modeling shows limited applicability of the drift spectrum based on the SDOF approximation. The SDOF drift spectrum approximation can only be applied to structures with smaller natural periods than the dominant period of the ground motion. For periods larger than the dominant period of ground motion the SDOF drift spectra model significantly underestimates maximum deformation. Strong pulse-type motions are observed in the near-source region of large earthquakes; however, there is a lack of waveforms collected from small earthquakes at very close distances that were recorded underground in mines. The results presented in this paper are relevant for structures with a height of a few meters, placed in an underground excavation. The strong ground motion sensors recorded mine-induced earthquakes in a deep gold mine, South Africa. The strongest monitored horizontal ground motion was caused by an event of magnitude 2 at a distance of 90 m with PGA 123 m/s2, causing drifts of 0.25%–0.35%. The weak underground motion has spectral characteristics similar to the strong ground motion observed on the earth's surface; the drift spectrum has a maximum value less than 0.02%.

Near-Field Ground Motion of the 2002 Denali Fault, Alaska, Earthquake Recorded at Pump Station 10

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 597-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Ellsworth ◽  
M. Celebi ◽  
J. R. Evans ◽  
E. G. Jensen ◽  
R. Kayen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Monitoring And Control ◽  
Peak Acceleration ◽  
Permanent Displacement ◽  
Soil Response ◽  
Denali Fault ◽  
Field Recording ◽  
Pump Station

A free-field recording of the Denali fault earthquake was obtained by the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company 3 km from the surface rupture of the Denali fault. The instrument, part of the monitoring and control system for the trans-Alaska pipeline, was located at Pump Station 10, approximately 85 km east of the epicenter. After correction for the measured instrument response, we recover a seismogram that includes a permanent displacement of 3.0 m. The recorded ground motion has relatively low peak acceleration (0.36 g) and very high peak velocity (180 cm/s). Nonlinear soil response may have reduced the peak acceleration to this 0.36 g value. Accelerations in excess of 0.1 g lasted for 10 s, with the most intense motion occurring during a 1.5-s interval when the rupture passed the site. The low acceleration and high velocity observed near the fault in this earthquake agree with observations from other recent large-magnitude earthquakes.

Spatial attenuation of intensities for central U.S. earthquakes

1976 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 743-751
Author(s):  
Indra N. Gupta ◽  
Otto W. Nuttli
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Mississippi Valley ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Anelastic Attenuation ◽  
Central United States ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Spatial Attenuation

abstract Attenuation of ground motion in the central United States has to be determined principally using the Modified Mercalli (MM) intensity observations because of the absence of instrumental strong ground-motion data. Nuttli's previous studies of Mississippi Valley earthquakes indicate that higher-mode surface waves produce the largest ground motion except possibly in the near-field region. Particle velocity rather than acceleration correlates directly with intensity and the coefficient of anelastic attenuation has an average value of 0.10 per degree. Using data from isoseismals of the November 9, 1968, southern Illinois and the December 16, 1811, New Madrid, Missouri earthquakes and assuming a linear relationship between log(A/T) and MM intensity, attenuation is expressed by the equation, valid for I(R) ≧IV (MM), I ( R ) = I 0 + 3.7 − 0.0011 R − 2.7 log ⁡ R ; for R ≧ 20 k m where R is the epicentral distance in kilometers. This relationship shows fairly good agreement with isoseismals of many large earthquakes in the central United States and may therefore be useful in providing realistic estimates of spatial attenuation and hence of design earthquakes for a given site. It can also be sometimes useful in estimating the epicentral intensity of an earthquake whose maximum intensity is not reliably known.

Multicycle Simulation of Strike-Slip Earthquake Rupture for Use in Near-Source Ground-Motion Simulations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Percy Galvez ◽  
Anatoly Petukhin ◽  
Paul Somerville ◽  
Jean-Paul Ampuero ◽  
Ken Miyakoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Stress Drop ◽  
Slip Rate ◽  
Rupture Process ◽  
Earthquake Rupture ◽  
Rupture Velocity ◽  
Source Inversion ◽  
Dynamic Rupture ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Source Scaling

ABSTRACT Realistic dynamic rupture modeling validated by observed earthquakes is necessary for estimating parameters that are poorly resolved by seismic source inversion, such as stress drop, rupture velocity, and slip rate function. Source inversions using forward dynamic modeling are increasingly used to obtain earthquake rupture models. In this study, to generate a large number of physically self-consistent rupture models, rupture process of which is consistent with the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of stress produced by previous earthquakes on the same fault, we use multicycle simulations under the rate and state (RS) friction law. We adopt a one-way coupling from multicycle simulations to dynamic rupture simulations; the quasidynamic solver QDYN is used to nucleate the seismic events and the spectral element dynamic solver SPECFEM3D to resolve their rupture process. To simulate realistic seismicity, with a wide range of magnitudes and irregular recurrence, several realizations of 2D-correlated heterogeneous random distributions of characteristic weakening distance (Dc) in RS friction are tested. Other important parameters are the normal stress, which controls the stress drop and rupture velocity during an earthquake, and the maximum value of Dc, which controls rupture velocity but not stress drop. We perform a parametric study on a vertical planar fault and generate a set of a hundred spontaneous rupture models in a wide magnitude range (Mw 5.5–7.4). We validate the rupture models by comparison of source scaling, ground motion (GM), and surface slip properties to observations. We compare the source-scaling relations between rupture area, average slip, and seismic moment of the modeled events with empirical ones derived from source inversions. Near-fault GMs are computed from the source models. Their peak ground velocities and peak ground accelerations agree well with the ground-motion prediction equation values. We also obtain good agreement of the surface fault displacements with observed values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document