scholarly journals Aldosterone antagonists in cardiology practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Andrey I. Danilov ◽  
Sergey N. Kozlov ◽  
Andrey V. Evseev
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Pharmacology ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Aldosterone Antagonists ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Wide Range

In review presents the patological effects of aldosterone, clinical pharmacology of aldosterone antagonists and their role in countering the development of cardiovascular diseases are highlighted. The results of clinical studies have demonstrated high clinical efficacy and safety of spironolactone and eplerenone in a wide range of cardiovascular risk. However, the potential adverse drug reactions associated with these drugs limit their use in some categories of patients. However, adequate monitoring of these reactions, including hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury, can be avoided. In situations where there are indications for the use of spironolactone or eplerenone, the latter is the drug of choice due to the lower risk of gender adverse reactions. The frequency of other adverse drug reactions, in particular hyperkalemia, spironolactone and eplerenone are comparable.

scholarly journals Charms & Harms: Noni

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Herbal Medicines ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Pharmaceutical Quality ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions

SUMMARY MESSAGE: Evidence for the efficacy of noni for the wide range of medicinal purposes for which it may be used is not available. Health professionals should be aware of the possibility of (undisclosed) use of noni and its use should be avoided, or at least used only with caution, in patients on warfarin. Suspected adverse drug reactions should be reported to CARM. As with all herbal medicines, different noni products vary in their pharmaceutical quality, and the implications of this for efficacy and safety should be considered.

scholarly journals Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions / Dematološka neželjena dejstva lekova

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-76
Author(s):  
Lidija Kandolf-Sekulović ◽  
Tatjana Radević
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Skin Diseases ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Drug Intake ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Adverse drug reactions may be defined as undesirable clinical manifestations resulting from administration of a particular drug; this includes reactions due to overdose, predictable side effects, and unanticipated adverse manifestations. Adverse drug effects on the skin are among the most frequent reactions and, according to a study, account for approximately 14% of all adverse drug reactions. However, the incidence of cutaneous adverse effects in general population is unknown. Systemic drug administration results in various cutaneous adverse reactions, and medications used in the treatment of skin diseases themselves have their own adverse effects. Adverse drug reactions include a wide range of effects, from harmless exanthema of short duration, urticaria to systemic cutaneous reactions such as drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Exanthematous eruptions and urticaria are the two most common forms of cutaneous drug reactions. Less common include fixed eruptions, lichenoid, pustular, bullous and vasculitis reactions. The most severe cutaneous and mucosal adverse drug reactions are epidermal necrolysis, which is usually drug-induced, DRESS syndrome, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Therefore, the diagnostic of adverse drug reactions requires a detailed history of drug intake and development of skin disorders, excellent knowledge of clinical presentations for a wide range of drug-induced skin reactions as well as of the very medications being taken by patients. In addition to details on drug intake, it is necessary to learn about taking herbal and alternative preparations, which may also cause adverse reactions. A drug started within 6 weeks of the development of disorders is considered the most common cause of adverse reaction, as well as drugs taken periodically but regularly. Once a reaction has occurred, it is important to prevent future similar reactions with the same drug or a cross-reacting medication. Early withdrawal of all potentially responsible drugs is essential, particularly in case of severe drug reactions.

Adverse Drug Reactions to Radiographic Contrast Media in a Teaching Hospital in North India: An Observational Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-126
Author(s):  
Deepti Chopra ◽  
Abhinav Jain ◽  
Richa Garg ◽  
Shreya Dhingra
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Contrast Media ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
North India ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Iodinated Contrast ◽  
Radiographic Contrast ◽  
Radiographic Contrast Media

Background: Radiocontrast media are used extensively nowadays to visualize internal organs. Currently, non-ionic iodinated contrast media are used which are generally considered to be safe but some adverse reactions have been reported. Thus, the present study was carried out to analyze the nature and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to radiographic contrast media in a teaching hospital. Methods:An observational study carried out for a period of six months in a teaching hospital. Contrast media induced adverse reactions were analyzed in terms of affected organs, rate, causality assessment, severity and preventability. The treatment and outcomes of adverse events were also recorded. Naranjo Probability Scale was used to evaluate the relationship between the contrast agent used and the suspected ADR. The severity of the suspected ADRs was determined using Hartwig Scale and preventability was assessed using modified Schumock and Thornton criterion. Results:A total of 15 suspected ADRs occurred in 11 patients with an incidence of 1.4%. It included 5 (45.4%) males and 6 (54.5%) females (p < 05). The highest percentage (72.7 %) of ADRs was seen in adult patients, the mean age being 40.8 years. Vomiting (33.3%) was the most common ADR noted followed by severe nausea and rashes. 64.7 % of ADRs were categorized as probable and 35.3 % were possible. Adverse reactions required treatment in 46.6% patients. There was no fatality reported. Conclusion:The reactions observed were mild to moderate in severity and occurred within 30 minutes of the administration of the contrast.

scholarly journals The Wonderful DMARD with Multiple Toxicities

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. RV5-RV10
Author(s):  
Yashika Kaushal ◽  
Ratibha Kausal ◽  
Isha Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Therapy Discontinuation ◽  
Chemotherapy Agent ◽  
Reduce Activity ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Rheumatic Drug

Methotrexate is a type of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). It is used to reduce activity of the immune system for people who have certain conditions. Methotrexate is a chemotherapy agent and immune system suppressant. Its use may be limited by concerns regarding its adverse reactions. The occurrence of adverse drug reactions in some cases leads to the therapy discontinuation. Although adverse drug reactions (ADR) of methotrexate generally do not pose a serious threat to the health of patients and a reduction in the dose of methotrexate leads to their elimination, in some cases severe toxicities of the drug occur unpredictably. These facts explain the need for close monitoring of the patient’s condition and the identification of potential risk factors for drug toxicity on the part of different organs and functional systems. The purpose of this review is to detail about safety and tolerability of methotrexate.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of selamectin of flea infestation in dags

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
S. SOTIRAKI (Σ. ΣΩΤΗΡΑΚΗ) ◽  
C. HIMONAS (Χ. ΧΕΙΜΩΝΑΣ) ◽  
P. DEBOUCK ◽  
G. BITSAS (Γ. ΜΠΙΤΖΑΣ)
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Untreated Group ◽  
Field Conditions ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Flea Infestation ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Monthly Dose ◽  
Adult Flea

The study was conducted at three dog shekers in Thessaloniki Greece, το confirm die efficacy and safety of selamectin aτ a minimum dosage of 6 mg/kg adminisτered topically as a monthly dose repeaτed three times in die treatment of natural i n f l a t i o n s of Ctenocephalides spp. Twenty (20) dogs, with confirmed naturally acquired flea inflations, were enrolled in die sttidy as primary patiems. All animals completed the study on day 90. Twenty-two in cornai dogs were also treated but not evaluated for efficacy (secondary patiems). There was no untreated group. Only one live adult flea was recovered on only one animal on study day 30, a reduction of die geomettical mean of 99.7 % (p < 0.0001) compared to the sτarτ of die study. Dead fleas were found on 3 animals aτ day 30 (1 or 2 per animal). No live or dead fleas were found on day 60 or on day 90. Ατ sttidy beginning on Day 0, seventy percem of sttidy animals had various clinical signs of flea inflation. These signs gradually decreased and by die end of die sttidy on day 90, only one animal remained widi a score of 1, indicating a low imensity in a single area of die body. All odier animals were free of clinical signs. No abnormal clinical signs or suspend adverse drug reactions were observed after treatment of die 20 primary or die 22 secondary patiems. The daτa collected confirm that under field conditions diree consecutive mondily doses of selamectin are highly effective and safe in die treatment and comrol of fleas in dogs.

scholarly journals Major Aspects of Detection and Monitoring of Adverse Reactions Associated with Cephalosporin Antibiotic Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Demchenkova ◽  
G. I. Gorodetskaya ◽  
I. A. Mazerkina ◽  
M. V. Zhuravleva ◽  
A. S. Kazakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Patient Information Leaflets ◽  
Information Leaflets ◽  
Spontaneous Reports ◽  
Cephalosporin Antibiotics

Widespread use of cephalosporin antibiotics in clinical practice calls for greater attention to the risk of adverse drug reactions. Information on serious or unexpected adverse events reported during post-marketing experience is submitted to national and international pharmacovigilance databases. Analysis of these reports helps to identify new adverse drug reactions.The aim of the study was to analyse the safety profile of cephalosporin antibiotics based on spontaneous reports in the international VigiBase database.Materials and methods: the analysis of the adverse reaction profile of cephalosporin antibiotics was based on MedDRA system organ classes and included spontaneous reports submitted to VigiBase from the moment of its creation until August 2020.Results: the authors identified the most clinically significant adverse reactions for different cephalosporin generations. They compared and analysed information on adverse events in VigiBase and in patient information leaflets of medicinal products authorised in the Russian Federation. It was demonstrated that some serious events described in VigiBase spontaneous reports for V-generation cephalosporins are not included in the “Side effects” section of the patient information leaflets. According to VigiBase, the use of ceftaroline was associated with the development of generalised exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, tubulointerstitial nephritis, while the use of ceftolozane was associated with acute kidney injury, renal insufficiency, sepsis, pneumonia, and respiratory insufficiency.Conclusion: reporting of unexpected and serious adverse drug reactions to cephalosporin antibiotics is an important task of healthcare practitioners. Availability of information on class-specific and generation-specific serious adverse reactions will help predict and prevent their development.

Cutaneous reactions to drugs

2020 ◽  
pp. 5752-5760
Author(s):  
Sarah Walsh ◽  
Daniel Creamer ◽  
Haur Yueh Lee
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Drug Eruptions ◽  
Fixed Drug ◽  
Iatrogenic Illness ◽  
Systemic Symptoms

Adverse reactions to medications are common and important cause of iatrogenic illness. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions include toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, which together constitute 2% of all adverse drug reactions and may be life-threatening. Less severe drug-induced skin reactions such as exanthems, urticaria, lichenoid drug rashes, and fixed drug eruptions are more common, sometimes termed benign cutaneous adverse reactions, and generally resolve without sequelae. Drugs may also cause adverse events due to alteration of the normal function of the skin or its appendages. This may take the form of photosensitivity, abnormal pigmentation, or disrupted growth of hair or nails.

scholarly journals Adverse drug reactions associated with treatment in patients with chronic rheumatic diseases in childhood: a retrospective real life review of a single center cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manar Amanouil Said ◽  
Liana Soido Teixeira e Silva ◽  
Aline Maria de Oliveira Rocha ◽  
Gustavo Guimarães Barreto Alves ◽  
Daniela Gerent Petry Piotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Chronic Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract Background Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are the sixth leading causes of death worldwide; monitoring them is fundamental, especially in patients with disorders like chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs). The study aimed to describe the ADRs investigating their severity and associated factors and resulting interventions in pediatric patients with CRDs. Methods A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study was conducted on a cohort of children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). The study evaluated medical records of the patients to determine the causality and the management of ADRs. In order to investigate the risk factors that would increase the risk of ADRs, a logistic regression model was carried out on a group of patients treated with the main used drug. Results We observed 949 ADRs in 547 patients studied. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequently used medication and also the cause of the most ADRs, which occurred in 63.3% of patients, followed by glucocorticoids (GCs). Comparing synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) vs biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), the ADRs attributed to the former were by far higher than the latter. In general, the severity of ADRs was moderate and manageable. Drug withdrawal occurred in almost a quarter of the cases. In terms of risk factors, most patients who experienced ADRs due to MTX, were 16 years old or younger and received MTX in doses equal or higher than 0.6 mg/kg/week. Patients with JIA and JDM had a lower risk of ADRs than patients with JSLE. In the multiple regression model, the use of GCs for over 6 months led to an increase of 0.5% in the number of ADRs. Conclusions Although the ADRs highly likely affect a wide range of children and adolescents with CRDs they were considered moderate and manageable cases mostly. However, triggers of ADRs need further investigations.

Clinical assessment of efficacy and safety of DDAVP

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S172-S175 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Miesbach ◽  
S. Krekeler ◽  
O. Dück ◽  
B. Llugaliu ◽  
G. Asmelash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Fluid Intake ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Clinical Routine ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Mild Haemophilia

SummaryThe efficacy of DDAVP (1-deamino-8-D-argi-nine-vasopressin, desmopressin) in mild haemophilia A and von Willebrand disease (VWD) has been established and the use of this well tolerated drug has become clinical routine. In case of increased fluid intake and based on very rarely occurring hyponatraemia, the indication of administration of DDAVP intravenously (i. v.) has to be performed diligently in elderly patients and in children below the age of five years. Aim, patients: Due to clinical practice we were interested in finding prospective parameter potentially correlating with adverse reactions of DDAVP and initiated this study. From 2007 to 2008, we included 49 patients suspicious to suffer from mild haemophilia A (n = 1) or VWD (n = 48) and investigated efficacy and safety of DDAVP after intravenous administration (mean: 0.29 ± 0.032 μg/kg body weight). They underwent clinical and laboratory investigation and were questioned with regard to potential adverse reactions immediately and three days after administration of DDAVP.: Results, conclusion: Most adverse reactions were mild and no serious adverse drug reactions were either observed or reported by the subjects. We identified significant changes of heart rate, blood pressure and leucocytes after conduct of the DDAVP test. The value of these findings has to be investigated in later prospective randomized studies. Further research on identification of prospective parameter is currently ongoing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document