scholarly journals A Study on Publication Planning of Inmunsa Focusing on Publication of Volumes and Series

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (null) ◽  
pp. 147-191
Author(s):  
서승희
Keyword(s):  
Publication Planning

Developing the Character of Learning Community: Islamic Education in Nusantara Perspective

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariha Azalea
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Learning Community ◽  
Lesson Study ◽  
Scientific Publication ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Publication Planning ◽  
Community Learning ◽  
Classroom Action Research

This research aims to promote the development of the character of learning community at Madrasah Tsanawiyah of Bantul Regency Yogyakarta, and two problems posed to be addressed: why the character of community learning pattern does not realize as it has been expected, and how does the development of the character of learning community at MTs of Bantul look like? The research uses the Research and Development model that is consisted of four stages: exploration, development, tests, and dissemination. The data were collected by means of observatiosn, interviews, questionaire, and review of documentation. The results show: (1) the character of learning community at the MTs in Bantul Regency has not been fully established because the teachers were not active in preparing their lesson study, and they did not benefit from it. Also, they were too busy in fulfilling their obligations as teachers; (2) the development of the character of learning community at MTs in Bantul could be implemented through Classroom Action Research-based lesson study plans which are consisted of five stages: consolidation of lesson study concepts, explanation of Classroom Action Research as a form of scientific publication, planning, implementation of action, and reflection.

scholarly journals Publication Planning 101

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Sismondo ◽  
Scott Howard Nicholson
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Medical Literature ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Publication Planning ◽  
Medical Publishing ◽  
Medical Planning

Question: This article is a report on a meeting of "publication planning", the organizational and practical work that shapes pharmaceutical companies' data and eventually turns it into medical journal articles, especially those reporting on clinical trials. Material and Methods: Our report is primarily based on information presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the International Society of Medical Planning Professionals (ISMPP) attended by one of us, including a workshop entitled "Publication Planning 101/201". The article is a narrative review based on statements made at the 2007 ISMPP meeting, on advertisements by publication planning agencies, and on previous reports and background literature. Findings: We argue that the main purpose of publication planning is to create and communicate scientific information to support the marketing of products. We provide some analysis of the role of publication planning in medical publishing, and its implications for the structuring of medical knowledge. Medical literature relevant to current drugs is to a large extent shaped by commercial interests.

Evidence development and publication planning: strategic process

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 2723-2727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Wittek ◽  
Mary Jo Williams ◽  
Angeline M. Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Publication Planning ◽  
Strategic Process

scholarly journals Run the Experiment, Publish the Study, Close the Sale: Business, Values, Science and Biomedical Research – A Thematic Introduction

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-21
Author(s):  
Aleta Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Biomedical Research ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Biomedical Science ◽  
Attribution Of Responsibility ◽  
Values In Science ◽  
Epistemic Values ◽  
Publication Planning ◽  
Methodological Choices

Business models for biomedical research prescribe decentralization due to market selection pressures. I argue that decentralized biomedical research does not match four normative philosophical models of the role of values in science. Non-epistemic values affect the internal stages of for-profit biomedical science. Publication planning, effected by Contract Research Organizations, inhibits mechanisms for transformative criticism. The structure of contracted research precludes attribution of responsibility for foreseeable harm resulting from methodological choices. The effectiveness of business strategies leads to over-representation of profit values versus the values of the general public. These disconnects in respect to the proper role of values in science results from structural issues ultimately linked to the distinct goals of business versus applied science, and so it seems likely that disconnects will also be found in other dimensions of attempts to combine business and science. The volume and integration in the publishing community of decentralized biomedical research imply that the entire community of biomedical research science cannot match the normative criteria of community-focused models of values in science. Several proposals for changing research funding structure might successfully relieve market pressures that drive decentralization.

Publication Planning

2019 ◽  
pp. 199-210
Author(s):  
Abby Day Peters
Keyword(s):  
Publication Planning

scholarly journals Publication planning: promoting an ethics of transparency and integrity in biomedical research

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 915-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. DeTora ◽  
C. Foster ◽  
C. Skobe ◽  
Y. E. Yarker ◽  
F. P. Crawley
Keyword(s):  
Biomedical Research ◽  
Publication Planning

scholarly journals High non publication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke C Carey ◽  
Serina Stretton ◽  
Charlotte A Kenreigh ◽  
Linda T Wagner ◽  
Karen L Woolley
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Publication Ethics ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Publication Planning ◽  
Annual Meeting Abstract ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
Medical Publication ◽  
Publication Practices

Background. The need for timely, ethical, and high-quality reporting of clinical trial results has seen a rise in demand for publication professionals. These publication experts, who are not ghostwriters, work with leading medical researchers and funders around the world to plan and prepare thousands of publications each year. Despite the involvement of publication professionals in an increasing number of peer-reviewed publications, especially those that affect patient care, there is limited evidence-based guidance in the peer-reviewed literature on their publication practices. Similar to the push for editors and the peer-review community to conduct and publish research on publication ethics and the peer-review process, the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) has encouraged members to conduct and publish research on publication planning and practices. Our primary objective was to investigate the publication rate of research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings. Methods. ISMPP Annual Meeting abstract lists (April 2009 to April 2014) were searched in November 2014 and data were extracted into a pilot-tested spreadsheet. MEDLINE was searched in December 2014 to determine the publication rate (calculated as the % of presented abstracts published as full papers in peer-reviewed journals). Data were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test (significance: P <.05) by an independent academic statistician. Results. From 2009 to 2014, there were 220 abstracts submitted, 185 accepted, and 164 presented. There were only four corresponding publications (publication rate 2.4%). Over time, ISMPP’s abstract acceptance rate (overall: 84.1%) did not change, but the number of abstracts presented increased significantly (P = .02). Most abstracts were presented as posters (81.1%) and most research was observational (72.6%). Most researchers came from the US (78.0%), followed by Europe (17.7%), and the Asia-Pacific region (11.2%). Discussion. Research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings has rarely been published in peer-reviewed journals. The high-rate of non publication by publication professionals has now been quantified and is of concern. Publication professionals should do more to contribute to evidence‑based publication practices, including, and especially, their own. Unless the barriers to publication are identified and addressed, the practices of publication professionals, which affect thousands of peer-reviewed publications each year, will remain hidden and unproven.

scholarly journals High non publication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke C Carey ◽  
Serina Stretton ◽  
Charlotte A Kenreigh ◽  
Linda T Wagner ◽  
Karen L Woolley
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Publication Ethics ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Publication Planning ◽  
Annual Meeting Abstract ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
Medical Publication ◽  
Publication Practices

Background. The need for timely, ethical, and high-quality reporting of clinical trial results has seen a rise in demand for publication professionals. These publication experts, who are not ghostwriters, work with leading medical researchers and funders around the world to plan and prepare thousands of publications each year. Despite the involvement of publication professionals in an increasing number of peer-reviewed publications, especially those that affect patient care, there is limited evidence-based guidance in the peer-reviewed literature on their publication practices. Similar to the push for editors and the peer-review community to conduct and publish research on publication ethics and the peer-review process, the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) has encouraged members to conduct and publish research on publication planning and practices. Our primary objective was to investigate the publication rate of research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings. Methods. ISMPP Annual Meeting abstract lists (April 2009 to April 2014) were searched in November 2014 and data were extracted into a pilot-tested spreadsheet. MEDLINE was searched in December 2014 to determine the publication rate (calculated as the % of presented abstracts published as full papers in peer-reviewed journals). Data were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test (significance: P <.05) by an independent academic statistician. Results. From 2009 to 2014, there were 220 abstracts submitted, 185 accepted, and 164 presented. There were only four corresponding publications (publication rate 2.4%). Over time, ISMPP’s abstract acceptance rate (overall: 84.1%) did not change, but the number of abstracts presented increased significantly (P = .02). Most abstracts were presented as posters (81.1%) and most research was observational (72.6%). Most researchers came from the US (78.0%), followed by Europe (17.7%), and the Asia-Pacific region (11.2%). Discussion. Research presented at ISMPP Annual Meetings has rarely been published in peer-reviewed journals. The high-rate of non publication by publication professionals has now been quantified and is of concern. Publication professionals should do more to contribute to evidence‑based publication practices, including, and especially, their own. Unless the barriers to publication are identified and addressed, the practices of publication professionals, which affect thousands of peer-reviewed publications each year, will remain hidden and unproven.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document