scholarly journals Mindfulness in Orphan and Parentless Adolescents as a Factor of Psychological Well-Being

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 36-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.I. Shulga
Keyword(s):  
Emotion Regulation ◽  
Emotional Regulation ◽  
Emotional Reactivity ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Psychological Effects ◽  
Cognitive Emotion Regulation ◽  
Psychological Well Being ◽  
Self Compassion ◽  
Resilience Scale ◽  
Strengths And Difficulties

The article presents a study of mindfulness as a feature of consciousness in orphan and parentless adolescents. The adolescents’ mindfulness is analysed through their awareness of the ability to achieve positive psychological effects, including psychological well-being and resilience. The study employed the following 9 techniques: the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM); the Resilience Scale; the Self-Compassion Scale; the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire; the Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scale; the Gratitude Questionnaire; the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; the scales for measuring readiness to help and aggression in the classroom; the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).The sample included 20 orphan and parentless adolescents. The study revealed that mindfulness is indeed a factor of psychological well-being. The educators of twenty organizations for orphans and children without parental care assessed the adolescents’ strengths and difficulties in order to evaluate their cognitive emotion regulation abilities.Сorrelation analysis allowed us to identify the relationship of mindfulness, psychological well-being indicators and emotional regulation with a number of social psychological characteristics of personality in the adolescents: indicators of positive psychological effects of mindfulness, in particular, humanity, resilience, competence (environmental management), and decrease of cognitive and emotional reactivity.

scholarly journals Cognition and Emotion: The Cognitive Regulation of Emotions : A Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Khatibi ◽  
Dr. Farideh Yousefi
Keyword(s):  
Emotion Regulation ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Affect Regulation ◽  
Emotional Reactivity ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Emotional States ◽  
Cognitive Emotion Regulation ◽  
Cognition And Emotion ◽  
Cognitive Regulation ◽  
And Coping

One of life’s great challenges is successfully regulating emotions (Gross, 2002). The topic of emotion regulation has been of interest since Freud (1923) began to examine the relationship between the control of affective impulses and psychic health ( Krohne et al., 2002) . The emerging field of emotion regulation studies how individuals influence which emotions they have, when they have them, and how they experience and express them. Emotion regulation is defined and distinguished from coping, mood regulation, defense, and affect regulation (Gross, 1998). Many studies have been conducted in the field of cognition and emotion; e.g., emotion regulation: Past, present, future (Gross, 1999), the cognitive regulation of emotions: The role of success versus failure experience and coping dispositions (Krohne et al., 2002), the cognitive control of emotion (Ochsner and Gross, 2005), relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: A comparative study of five specific samples, (Garnefski and Kraaij, 2002), incorporating emotion regulation into conceptualizations and treatments of anxiety and mood disorders (Campbell-Sills et al., 2007), healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development (John and Gross, 2004), emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything (Gross, 2001 ),emotional states, attention, and working memory. Emotion regulation in depression: Relation to cognitive inhibition (Joormann and Gotlib, 2010), individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being (Gross and John, 2003), mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R)(Laurenceau, 2007), regulation of distress and negative emotions: A developmental view (Kopp, 1989), basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations (Izard, 1992), emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation in anxious children, (Carthy, 2010)

The relationship between coping, emotion regulation, and quality of life of patients on dialysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Barberis ◽  
Valeria Cernaro ◽  
Sebastiano Costa ◽  
Gaetano Montalto ◽  
Silvia Lucisano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Emotion Regulation ◽  
Emotional Regulation ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cognitive Emotion Regulation ◽  
Avoidance Strategies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Previous studies have investigated constructs that facilitate adaptation to chronic disease and improve quality of life and constructs that lead to psychopathological complications. The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of coping and emotional regulation on the quality of life of patients on dialysis. Three questionnaires were administered to 78 patients on dialysis: Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced, Short Form (36), and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Regressions analyses indicated that age, Rumination, Positive Refocusing, Avoidance Strategies, Approach to the Problem, and Transcendent Orientation predicted Physical Health. With regard to Mental Health, the predictors were gender, Self-Blame, Acceptance, Rumination, Positive Reappraisal, Catastrophizing, Avoidance Strategies, and Transcendent Orientation. This study confirms the relationship between emotional regulation, coping, and quality of life. The results highlight the need for total care of the patients, including an assessment of both physical state and psychological functioning in order to promote total well-being.

scholarly journals INVESTIGATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING, SELF ESTEEM, PERCEIVED GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY, LEVEL OF HOPE AND COGNITIVE EMOTION REGULATION STRATEGIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Nejat Akfirat
Keyword(s):  
Emotion Regulation ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Marmara Region ◽  
Emotion Regulation Strategies ◽  
Cognitive Emotion Regulation ◽  
Psychological Well Being ◽  
Regulation Strategies ◽  
General Self Efficacy

<p>In this study, the relationship between pre-service teachers' psychological well-being levels and self-esteem, perceived general self-efficacy, cognitive emotion regulation strategies and hope variables were investigated together with how these variables predicted pre-service teachers' psychological well-being. The research was conducted via relational screening model. The research group consists of a total of 403 participants including 206 females and 197 males, who received pedagogical formation education at a university located in Turkey’s Marmara Region, and participants were selected using a simple random sampling method. In the research, Psychological Well-Being Scale (short form), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Scale, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and Personal Information Form were used as data collection tools. The data obtained were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. According to the findings, self-esteem, general self-efficacy, level of hope, positive reappraisal from cognitive emotion regulation strategies, accusing and accepting others significantly predicted psychological well-being.</p><p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/edu_01/0526/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document