A Case Study on the Retirement Wealth of a Defined Contribution Plan: Comparing in Pseudo-Defined Benefit

2016 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 109-142
Author(s):  
Kyonghee Lee
Keyword(s):  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Defined Contribution Plan ◽  
Retirement Wealth

scholarly journals Lessons for public pensions from Utah's move to pension choice

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT L. CLARK ◽  
EMMA HANSON ◽  
OLIVIA S. MITCHELL
Keyword(s):  
Cost Savings ◽  
Pension Plan ◽  
The State ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Public Employment ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Active Choice ◽  
Defined Contribution Plan ◽  
New Hires

AbstractWe explore what happened when the state of Utah moved away from its traditional defined benefit pension. In its place, it offered new hires a choice between a conventional defined contribution plan and a hybrid plan option, where the latter has both a guaranteed benefit component and a defined contribution plan where employees bear investment risk. We show that around 60% of new hires failed to make any active choice and, as a result, were automatically defaulted into the hybrid plan. Slightly more than half of those who made an active choice elected the hybrid plan. Post-reform, employees who failed to actively elect a primary retirement plan were also far less likely to enroll in a supplemental retirement account, compared with new hires who actively selected a plan. We also find that employees hired following the reform were more likely to leave public employment, resulting in higher separation rates. This could reflect a reduction in the desirability of public employment under the new pension design and an improving economic climate in the state. Our results imply that public pension reformers must consider employee responses in addition to potential cost savings, when developing and enacting major pension plan changes.

The decline of defined benefit plans and job tenure

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALLISON SCHRAGER
Keyword(s):  
Pension Plan ◽  
Job Turnover ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Job Tenure ◽  
Benefit Plan ◽  
Job Separation ◽  
Defined Benefit Plans ◽  
Defined Contribution Pension Plan ◽  
Defined Contribution Plan

AbstractThis paper investigates the consequences of relying on assets accumulated in a defined contribution pension plan compared to an annuity based on salary from a defined benefit plan. Although a defined contribution plan varies with asset returns, it may be more desirable than a defined benefit plan when wage variability and job turnover are adequately considered. It is found that both job separation rates and wage variance increased in the 1990s. The new calibrations of these variables are used in a life-cycle model where a worker chooses between a defined benefit and a defined contribution plan. It is shown that the increase in job turnover made defined contribution the dominant pension plan.

Case Study

1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold W. Burlingame ◽  
Michael J. Gulotta
Keyword(s):  
Pension Plan ◽  
Pension Plans ◽  
Defined Benefit ◽  
Corporate America ◽  
Defined Contribution ◽  
Cash Balance ◽  
Retirement Benefits ◽  
Strategic Objectives

The potential for using a cash balance pension plan as a restructuring tool is one reason it is gaining favor throughout corporate America. Another reason is that it can give employees a better understanding and appreciation of their retirement benefits. Both reasons are important at a time when companies are changing rapidly and sometimes downsizing and when employees are less likely to stay in one place long enough to anticipate reaping the rewards of a defined bene-fit plan. Cash balance plans combine some of the best features of defined contribution (DC) and defined benefit (DB) plans. For employers, they provide more flexibility than traditional DB plans and help companies achieve their strategic objectives. For employees, they better meet the needs of a changing workforce by delivering portable, easily understood benefits. Since 1985, more than 200 companies have replaced their DB pension plans with a cash bal-ance design. One of the newest and most enthu-siastic proponents is AT&T, which, with the help of consulting firm ASA, Inc., designed a cash bal-. ance plan to help meet its restructuring goals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document