scholarly journals ‘My Mummy is an Artist’ – On Listening to Our Children, Blood, and Letting Go of Public Recognition (Along with Everything Else)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Baillie
ASHA Leader ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Vescovich
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Bonanno ◽  
S. Kaltman
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank C. Richardson ◽  
Kathryn M. Frost
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-346
Author(s):  
Esther Miedema ◽  
Winny Koster ◽  
Nicky Pouw ◽  
Philippe Meyer ◽  
Albena Sotirova

There is a burgeoning body of research on the role of ‘shame’ and ‘honour’ in decisions regarding early marriage in different parts of the world. Conceptualizing shame and honour as idioms through which gendered socio-economic inequalities are created and maintained, we examine early marriage decisions in Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Ghana, Burkina Faso and Senegal. While we acknowledge the existence of important differences between countries in terms of the nature and manifestations of shame and honour, we argue that regardless of setting, neither shame and honour, nor female sexuality and chastity can be separated from the socio-economic hierarchies and inequalities. Thus, in this article we seek to identify the cross-cutting dynamic of marriage as a means to overcome the shame associated with young single women’s sexuality, protecting family honour and social standing, and/or securing young women’s social-economic future. Building on our data and available scholarship, we question the potential of emphasizing ‘choice’ as a means of reducing early marriage and advancing women’s emancipation in international development efforts. Instead, we argue in favour of initiatives that engage with young people and caregivers on the ways in which, at grassroot levels, communities may revise narratives of respectability, marriageability and social standing.


2021 ◽  
pp. 120633122199769
Author(s):  
Hamzah Muzaini

This article concerns how heritage pertaining to the Second World War (1941–1945), as this has been made manifest in the urban environments of Perak, Malaysia, is (de)valued and (mis) assessed over multiple scales within the state. After foregrounding the biases associated with official depictions of the event, it excavates the ways informal actors have sought to overturn the collective amnesia of the state by creating heritages “in the shadows” and/or pushing for public recognition of formally occluded pasts. In doing so, the article argues for the salience of academics and policymakers alike, taking more seriously these non-state efforts, while also evidencing informal heritage-making as itself prone to limits and (not always altruistic) motives, which render their valuation as incomplete as formal efforts at remembering. More broadly, the article argues for the need to pay more attention to heritage-making “from below” in valuations of urban environments, but it cautions against treating them as more than what they are, that is, pasts as presenced by someone else.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document