Recent Initiatives for Radiation Oncology Resident Education in Radiation and Cancer Biology

2007 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Dynlacht ◽  
Elaine M. Zeman
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Resident Education

scholarly journals Do We Need a New Approach to Cancer Biology Education for Radiation Oncology Residents?

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivasan Vijayakumar ◽  
Maurice King ◽  
Mary R Nittala ◽  
Roy J Duhe
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Biology Education ◽  
New Approach

scholarly journals Radiation oncology resident education in palliative care

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pericles J. Ioannides ◽  
Randy L. Wei
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Resident Education

scholarly journals Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology: Is It Here to Stay? Impacts on Patient Care and Resident Education

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-420
Author(s):  
Paulina M. Gutkin ◽  
Nicolas D. Prionas ◽  
Madeline O. Minneci ◽  
Elena Allen ◽  
Katy E. Balazy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Resident Education

scholarly journals Survey of Resident Education in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renuka Malik ◽  
Julia L. Oh ◽  
John C. Roeske ◽  
Arno J. Mundt
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Resident Education ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
The United States ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Journal Clubs ◽  
Hands On

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been gaining increasing popularity among practicing physicians in the U.S., but the extent to which radiation oncology residents are taught the principles of this technology and are trained to use IMRT remains unknown. In this paper, we assessed the current level of resident education in IMRT in the United States. Chief residents at all 77 accredited radiation oncology programs were sent a 13-question survey addressing formal didactics and hands-on experience in IMRT. The survey assessed the frequency, subject, and format of IMRT didactics. Questions also addressed the number of IMRT patients and anatomical sites treated, resident involvement in the IMRT process, and the intent of IMRT use. Finally, residents were asked for their opinions on their IMRT education. Sixty-one surveys (79%) were completed. Overall, forty-three respondents (71%) reported receiving formal IMRT didactics, with nearly one-third reporting extensive didactics (≥ 3 lectures/seminars et cetera per year). The most common didactic formats were lectures (95%) and journal clubs (63%), most commonly supervised by physicists (98%). Involvement by physicians and radiobiologists were reported by 63% and 7% of respondents, respectively. Overall, 87% of respondents had hands-on IMRT training, with nearly one-half having treated >25 patients. The most common sites treated were head and neck (94%) and prostate (81%). Involvement in all aspects of the IMRT process was common, particularly target and tissue delineation (98%) and plan evaluation (93%). Most respondents (79%) with hands-on experience reported receiving formal didactics. However, nearly one-third received no or only minimal formal didactics. The percentage of respondents desiring increased IMRT didactics and hands-on experience were 70% and 47%, respectively. Our results suggest that the great majority of radiation oncology residents in the United States are currently exposed to didactics and hands-on training in IMRT. Areas of potential improvement include increased involvement of physicians and radiobiologists in formal IMRT didactics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document