Enhancing biological control of the sugarcane borer in Brazil by usingBacillus thuringiensisand conserving naturally occurring predators

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odair Aparecido Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Sugarcane Borer ◽  
Naturally Occurring

scholarly journals Myco-Biocontrol of Insect Pests: Factors Involved, Mechanism, and Regulation

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sardul Singh Sandhu ◽  
Anil K. Sharma ◽  
Vikas Beniwal ◽  
Gunjan Goel ◽  
Priya Batra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Recent Progress ◽  
Insect Pests ◽  
Insect Pest ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Attractive Alternative ◽  
Insect Pest Control ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Chemical Inputs ◽  
Chemical Pesticides

The growing demand for reducing chemical inputs in agriculture and increased resistance to insecticides have provided great impetus to the development of alternative forms of insect-pest control. Myco-biocontrol offers an attractive alternative to the use of chemical pesticides. Myco-biocontrol agents are naturally occurring organisms which are perceived as less damaging to the environment. Their mode of action appears little complex which makes it highly unlikely that resistance could be developed to a biopesticide. Past research has shown some promise of the use of fungi as a selective pesticide. The current paper updates us about the recent progress in the field of myco-biocontrol of insect pests and their possible mechanism of action to further enhance our understanding about the biological control of insect pests.

Biological control ofBotrytis cinereaon tomato using naturally occurring fungal antagonists

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 729-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mónaco ◽  
G. Dal Bello ◽  
M. C. Rollán ◽  
L. Ronco ◽  
G. Lampugnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Naturally Occurring

Naturally-occurring biological control of the boll weevil [Col.: Curculionidae]

Entomophaga ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Sterling ◽  
D. A. Dean ◽  
D. A. Fillman ◽  
D. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Boll Weevil ◽  
Naturally Occurring

scholarly journals Effect of Population Density of Pseudomonas fluorescens on Production of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol in the Rhizosphere of Wheat

1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 470-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jos M. Raaijmakers ◽  
Robert F. Bonsall ◽  
David M. Weller
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Population Density ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Pseudomonas Spp ◽  
Fluorescent Pseudomonas ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Rhizosphere Population ◽  
First Time ◽  
Take All

The role of antibiotics in biological control of soilborne pathogens, and more generally in microbial antagonism in natural disease-suppressive soils, often has been questioned because of the indirect nature of the supporting evidence. In this study, a protocol for high pressure liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry is described that allowed specific identification and quantitation of the antibiotic 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (Phl) produced by naturally occurring fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. on roots of wheat grown in a soil suppressive to take-all of wheat. These results provide, for the first time, biochemical support for the conclusion of previous work that Phl-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. are key components of the natural biological control that operates in take-all—suppressive soils in Washington State. This study also demonstrates that the total amount of Phl produced on roots of wheat by P. fluorescens strain Q2-87, at densities ranging from approximately 105 to 107 CFU/g of root, is proportional to its rhizosphere population density and that Phl production per population unit is a constant (0.62 ng/105 CFU). Thus, Phl production in the rhizosphere of wheat is strongly related to the ability of the introduced strain to colonize the roots.

Screening Sugars Can Benefit the Parasitoid Cotesia chilonis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Without Benefiting Its Host, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 2142-2148
Author(s):  
Jun-Ce Tian ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Anthony M Shelton ◽  
Xu-Song Zheng ◽  
Hong-Xing Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Source ◽  
Biological Control ◽  
Chilo Suppressalis ◽  
Sugar Consumption ◽  
Control Efficacy ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Rich Food ◽  
Rice Pest ◽  
Cotesia Chilonis

Abstract Most adult parasitoids depend on carbohydrate-rich food as an energy source for longevity, fecundity, and mobility. Thus, providing sugars has been proposed as a technique to maximize the biological control efficacy of parasitoids. However, the sugars provided for parasitoids need to be carefully selected because herbivore hosts might also benefit. Here we explore the effects of 12 naturally occurring sugars on the longevity and fecundity of the rice pest, Chilo suppressalis, and the longevity of its parasitoid, Cotesia chilonis, as well as the effect of sugars on sugar consumption of C. chilonis. Results showed that none of the tested sugars significantly impacted the longevity of C. suppressalis, but fructose, glucose, maltose, and sucrose significantly increased its fecundity. The longevity of C. chilonis was significantly increased when fed fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose, trehalose, and melezitose. Our data suggest that C. chilonis consumed larger quantities of glucose, fructose, and sucrose followed by maltose, melezitose, and trehalose and the longevity of C. chilonis was positively correlated to sugar consumption. Our data also suggest that the herbivore C. suppressalis and its parasitoid C. chilonis responded differently to trehalose and melezitose. Although additional studies are needed, our data suggest that these sugars could be considered as candidate components for sugar sprays to enhance the activity and efficacy of C. chilonis, but without benefiting its pest host.

scholarly journals ARTHROPOD PREDATORS IN CABBAGE (CRUCIFERAE) AND THEIR POTENTIAL AS NATURALLY OCCURRING BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS FOR PIERIS RAPAE (LEPIDOPTERA: PIERIDAE)

2000 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Schmaedick ◽  
Anthony M. Shelton
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Pieris Rapae ◽  
Wolf Spider ◽  
Arthropod Species ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Plant Samples ◽  
Arthropod Predators ◽  
High Propensity ◽  
Plant Foliage ◽  
Trap Catches

AbstractWe used three sampling methods to identify the arthropod predators most abundant and active in fields of cabbage, Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata, and determined those most likely to be important predators of the imported cabbageworm, Pieris rapae L., by testing the predators’ abilities to forage on cabbage plants and to feed on Pieris rapae in small arenas in the laboratory. Abundance and activity in the field were monitored with pitfall traps, sticky traps applied directly to leaves, and plant samples. Four criteria were used to assess the species’ potential value as a predator of Pieris rapae in cabbage: relatively high overall abundance in trap catches and plant samples, occurrence on plant foliage in the field, a high propensity to feed on Pieris rapae eggs and first instars, and the ability to search for larval Pieris rapae on cabbage plants. Four species, the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Hentz) (Araneae: Lycosidae), the harvestman Phalangium opilio L. (Opiliones: Phalangiidae), and the lady beetles Coleomegilla maculata lengi Timberlake and Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), demonstrated these attributes, although all four species appeared unable to search for prey on some parts of the cabbage plants, owing to unsure footing on the plants’ slippery cuticular wax. Linyphiids (Araneae) and syrphids (Diptera), the most abundant taxa in the plant samples, may prove better at thoroughly searching cabbage plants, but remain to be tested in future laboratory trials. Our results show that only a small portion of the predatory arthropod species that occur in cabbage fields is likely to prey on Pieris rapae on the plants, although important questions remain about the roles of some taxa. Future efforts to enhance biological control of Pieris rapae by naturally occurring predators can now focus on further elucidating and finding ways to enhance the roles of those predators that are effective.

scholarly journals Performance of insecticides in control of Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in sugarcane

2020 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Feitosa da Silva ◽  
Marina Funichello ◽  
Diego Miranda de Souza
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
The Other ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Sugarcane Borer ◽  
Diatraea Saccharalis ◽  
Lower Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Four Blocks ◽  
Phytosanitary Products

ABSTRACT The population of the caterpillar Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) has increased in the crop of sugarcane in recent years. Although the control of this insect is traditionally carried out through biological control, the use of phytosanitary products has still been necessary. Therefore, the goal of this work was to evaluate the performance of different insecticides in sugarcane borer control, as well as the effect on productivity and total recoverable sugar (TRS). The experiment was conducted in a randomized experimental delineation of blocks, with six treatments and four blocks. Treatments consisted of five insecticides and one control group (without application of insecticide). For calculating the D. saccharalis infestation index, monthly samplings were performed every 30 days, for 12 months. After this period, the final D. saccharalis infestation index was evaluated and calculated for each treatment. In order to compare productivity among procedures, four central lines were collected from each plot. Thus, the samples were weighed for the productivity calculation (TCH) and sent to the laboratory for the total recoverable sugar (TRS) analysis. The chloranthraniliprole (350) insecticide provided a lower index of sugarcane borer infestation, in addition to greater productivity when compared to the other insecticides. There was no significant difference in the parameter of total recoverable sugar (TRS) among treatments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document