scholarly journals Use of Flax Oil to Influence Honey Bee Nestmate Recognition

2012 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1145-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Breed ◽  
Cecily A. Lyon ◽  
Anna Sutherland ◽  
Robert Buchwald
1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL D. BREED ◽  
MELISSA F. GARRY ◽  
ALISON N. PEARCE ◽  
BRUCE E. HIBBARD ◽  
LOUIS B. BJOSTAD ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Bowden ◽  
S. Williamson ◽  
M. D. Breed

1998 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL D BREED ◽  
ELIZABETH A LEGER ◽  
ALISON N PEARCE ◽  
YU JU WANG

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (42) ◽  
pp. eabd3431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassondra L. Vernier ◽  
Iris M. Chin ◽  
Boahemaa Adu-Oppong ◽  
Joshua J. Krupp ◽  
Joel Levine ◽  
...  

In the honey bee, genetically related colony members innately develop colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbon profiles, which serve as pheromonal nestmate recognition cues. Yet, despite high intracolony relatedness, the innate development of colony-specific chemical signatures by individual colony members is largely determined by the colony environment, rather than solely relying on genetic variants shared by nestmates. Therefore, it is puzzling how a nongenic factor could drive the innate development of a quantitative trait that is shared by members of the same colony. Here, we provide one solution to this conundrum by showing that nestmate recognition cues in honey bees are defined, at least in part, by shared characteristics of the gut microbiome across individual colony members. These results illustrate the importance of host-microbiome interactions as a source of variation in animal behavioral traits.


2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 477-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca R. Dani ◽  
Graeme R. Jones ◽  
Silvia Corsi ◽  
Richard Beard ◽  
Duccio Pradella ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassondra L. Vernier ◽  
Joshua J. Krupp ◽  
Katelyn Marcus ◽  
Abraham Hefetz ◽  
Joel D. Levine ◽  
...  

AbstractLarge social insect colonies exhibit a remarkable ability for recognizing group members via colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) pheromonal signatures. Previous work suggested that in some ant species colony-specific signatures are generated through a “gestalt” mechanism via the passive transfer and homogenization of CHCs across all individual members of the colony. In contrast, we demonstrate that nestmate recognition cues of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) mature in foragers via a sequence of stereotypic age-dependent quantitative and qualitative chemical transitions, which are driven by intrinsic biosynthetic pathways. Therefore, in contrast to predictions of the “Gestalt” model, nestmate recognition cues in honey bee colonies do not represent a passive “average” signature that is carried and recognized by all colony members. Instead, specific colony members develop the relevant cues via an innately-determined developmental program that can be modulated by colony-specific social environmental factors.


EDIS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Mueller ◽  
Cameron Jack ◽  
Ashley N. Mortensen ◽  
Jamie D. Ellis

European foulbrood is a bacterial disease that affects Western honey bee larvae. It is a concern to beekeepers everywhere, though it is less serious than American foulbrood because it does not form spores, which means that it can be treated. This 7-page fact sheet written by Catherine M. Mueller, Cameron J. Jack, Ashley N. Mortensen, and Jamie Ellis and published by the UF/IFAS Entomology and Nematology Department describes the disease and explains how to identify it to help beekeepers manage their colonies effectively and prevent the spread of both American and European foulbrood.https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/in1272


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document