scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Nomological Network of Work Ability

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant Brady
Keyword(s):  
Work Ability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nomological Network

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Improving Absenteeism, Productivity, and Work Ability of Employees: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Tarro ◽  
Elisabet Llauradó ◽  
Gemma Ulldemolins ◽  
Pedro Hermoso ◽  
Rosa Solà
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Work Ability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Employee Productivity ◽  
Workplace Interventions ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Randomized Controlled

To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions and the most effective methodological design for the improvement of employee productivity, work ability, and absenteeism. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of workplace interventions was conducted (PROSPERO, CRD42018094083). The PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases were searched. RCTs from 2000 to 2017 and with employees (18–65 years) were selected. Then, intervention characteristics and work-related outcomes data were extracted. A total of 47 RCTs were included in the systematic review, and 19 RCTs (11 absenteeism, 7 productivity, and 5 work ability) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the effectiveness of workplace interventions for absenteeism was −1.56 (95% CI, −2.67 to −0.44) and −2.65 (95% CI, −4.49 to −0.81) considering only moderate quality RCTs. In contrast, only a few studies of workplace interventions for productivity and work ability were included, which was insufficient for determining the effectiveness and best design for improving these work outcomes. The workplace is an interesting environment to reduce absenteeism, and individualized and counseling interventions with <10 sessions/total were the most effective workplace intervention methodological design for reducing the absenteeism of employees. Future high-quality RCTs that also consider health risks should be implemented to strengthen the results.

A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions.

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traci Sitzmann ◽  
Kenneth G. Brown ◽  
Wendy J. Casper ◽  
Katherine Ely ◽  
Ryan D. Zimmerman
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nomological Network ◽  
Trainee Reactions

scholarly journals Worldwide prevalence of inadequate work ability among hospital nursing personnel: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Manuel Romero‐Sánchez ◽  
Ana María Porcel‐Gálvez ◽  
Olga Paloma‐Castro ◽  
Jesús García‐Jiménez ◽  
María Eugenia González‐Domínguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Work Ability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nursing Personnel ◽  
Hospital Nursing

An Examination of the Triarchic Model of Psychopathy’s Nomological Network: A Meta-Analytic Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea Sleep ◽  
Josh Miller ◽  
Donald Lynam ◽  
Brandon Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Externalizing Behavior ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Adaptive Functioning ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Criterion Validity ◽  
Nomological Network ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
Criterion Variables ◽  
Triarchic Model

Psychopathy is characterized by a constellation of traits including callousness, superficial charm, grandiosity, exploitativeness, irresponsibility, and impulsivity (e.g., Cleckley, 1941; Hare, 2003). Despite longstanding interest, the nature and scope of the construct as well as the centrality and sufficiency of its components remain debated (i.e., Fearless Dominance/Boldness; Miller &amp; Lynam, 2012; Lilienfeld et al., 2012). Recently, the Triarchic Model of Psychopathy (TriPM; Patrick, Fowles, &amp; Krueger, 2009) has garnered considerable interest, positing that psychopathy can be characterized by three partially overlapping, phenotypic domains: Boldness, Meanness, and Disinhibition. The present meta-analysis sought to examine the relations between these domains and other well-validated psychopathy measures and theoretically relevant outcomes in its nomological network. Across outcomes, Meanness and Disinhibition demonstrated robust convergent and criterion validity with other models of psychopathy as well as with pathological traits and externalizing outcomes; however, they manifested limited discriminant validity in relation to one another. In addition, empirical evidence for Boldness in relation to maladaptive outcomes was much weaker. Specifically, Boldness evinced the most robust relations with markers of adaptive functioning and only small relations with central criterion variables (e.g., externalizing behavior).

A Meta-Analysis of Interpersonal and Organizational Workplace Deviance Research

2019 ◽  
pp. 014920631986261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy D. Mackey ◽  
Charn P. McAllister ◽  
B. Parker Ellen ◽  
Jack E. Carson
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Workplace Deviance ◽  
Nomological Network ◽  
Solid Foundation ◽  
Nuanced Understanding ◽  
Extensive Body ◽  
Contrasting Method ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Relationship

Workplace deviance research has expanded rapidly over the past decade. Despite the expansive body of research available, we have an incomplete understanding of the measurement, magnitude, and direction of relationships within workplace deviance’s nomological network. We draw from 235 empirical samples of data (k = 235, N = 66,990) to conduct random-effects meta-analyses of interpersonal (k = 156, N = 42,239) and organizational (k = 206, N = 60,008) workplace deviance research so we can build the solid foundation necessary to advance the conversation in this literature. We use an exploratory meta-analytic approach and the horizontal contrasting method of theory elaboration to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship between interpersonal and organizational deviance (ρ = .67, k = 110, N = 30,426) as well as determine the magnitude and generalizability (i.e., external validity) of relationships within their nomological networks. We find some evidence of differences (i.e., heterogeneity) in the measurement and magnitude of relationships across contexts. Overall, we conduct a state-of-the-art meta-analysis that leverages contemporary meta-analytic techniques and the extensive body of empirical workplace deviance research available to improve our understanding of the measurement of workplace deviance and relationships within its nomological network. Our study instigates new debates about the completeness of our understanding of workplace deviance and provides the empirical building blocks necessary for this literature to reach its unrealized potential.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document