scholarly journals Unpredicted eye preference in anisometropic children diagnosed late with amblyopia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Amir Sternfeld ◽  
Raphaella Segal ◽  
Michael Altman ◽  
Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen
Keyword(s):  
1987 ◽  
Vol 411 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Stefan Bracha ◽  
David J. Seitz ◽  
John Otemaa ◽  
Stanley D. Glick

1928 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 431-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Snyder ◽  
M. A. Snyder
Keyword(s):  

1971 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Kruper ◽  
Robert A. Patton ◽  
Yale D. Koskoff
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.P. Bucci ◽  
Z. Kapoula ◽  
M. Bernotas ◽  
F. Zamfirescu

1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1163-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Sappington

Anomalous cerebral dominance can have multiple manifestations, e.g., left-eye preference or left-foot preference in the absence of left handedness per se. The 1987 estimate of prevalence of anomalous dominance in the population by Geschwind and Behan approaches 30%, three times the estimate obtained by using handedness alone as the sorting criterion. Accordingly, substantial numbers of subjects assigned to “dextral” groups may actually display other legitimate indicators of anomalous dominance. As such there is a tendency to commit Type II errors in studies in which handedness alone is used to represent the variance attributed to cerebral dominance. Accordingly, null hypotheses assessing the relations of cerebral dominance with dependent variables are accepted even though they may, in fact, be false.


Author(s):  
Deirdre B. Yeater ◽  
Sara Guarino ◽  
Steve Lacy ◽  
Tricia Dees ◽  
Heather M. Hill

Lateralization of behaviors and information processing are common across species. Hypothesized to be crucial for more efficient responding to environmental stimuli, lateralization has been investigated for a number of topics. Cetaceans are proposed to be hemispheric specialists, given a small corpus callosum, complete decussation of the optic nerve, and the ability to respond to a different visual stimulus presented to each eye simultaneously. Research with cetaceans has shown strong biases in a number of behaviors, including swimming, foraging, social interactions, and responses to myriad visual stimuli. Given similar evolutionary pressures, different species of cetaceans should display similar lateralized preferences. Previous research with bottlenose dolphins in managed care and wild striped dolphins indicated a right eye preference when viewing unfamiliar objects. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the eye preference of belugas, bottlenose dolphins, and Pacific white-sided dolphins (lags) in managed care when viewing familiar and unfamiliar objects. The results from 11 belugas, 5 bottlenose dolphins, and 5 lags indicated that consistent group level eye preferences were not present. The belugas preferred to view both types of objects with both eyes, with the majority of the belugas showing a left-eye preference when a monocular gaze was used. Bottlenose dolphins tended to view both objects with their right eye while lags used their left eye when viewing objects. These results may have been affected by viewing objects below water versus above water. The belugas and the Pacific white-sided dolphins were able to view the objects below water, which may have elicited more naturalistic visual examinations of the objects (i.e., greater ecological validity). Viewing objects within one’s habitat may facilitate the discrimination of an object rather than simply its detection, which is may be more likely when encountering stimuli above the surface of the water as the bottlenose dolphins had to do in the present and past research. Future research should compare if presentation of the stimulus above water versus below water affects the eye preference displayed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document