scholarly journals A Cochlearis Implantáltak Funkcionális Indexe (CIFI) magyarországi bevezetésével szerzett kezdeti tapasztalatok

2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (33) ◽  
pp. 1296-1303
Author(s):  
Gréta Bodzai ◽  
Márton Kovács ◽  
János Uzsaly ◽  
Kinga Harmat ◽  
Adrienn Németh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Social State ◽  
Remarkable Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaires ◽  
Function Index

Abstract: Introduction: The success of cochlear implantation can be evaluated with audiological measurements and quality of life questionnaires. Aim: Our aim was to translate and introduce the Cochlear Implant Function Index (CIFI) test to analyze the physical, psychological and social state of our cochlear implant patients. Method: Between 01. 11. 2016 and 31. 05. 2018, 30 patients filled the questionnaire before and 6 and 12 months after the implantation. Results and conclusion: Results showed a remarkable improvement in the quality of life in several patients even after 6 months. Further improvements could be measured after 12 months. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(33): 1296–1303.

scholarly journals Multicentre cohort study of cochlear implantation outcomes in Thailand

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e054041
Author(s):  
Patorn Piromchai ◽  
Napas Tanamai ◽  
Sivaporn Kiatthanabumrung ◽  
Suwicha Kaewsiri ◽  
Kanthong Thongyai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Implant Surgery ◽  
Cochlear Implant Surgery ◽  
The Mean

ObjectivesTo report the status and outcomes of cochlear implantation in Thailand.DesignCohort study.SettingTertiary care and university hospitals.ParticipantsPatients who underwent cochlear implant surgery in Thailand.InterventionsThis project collected data from all government and university hospitals in Thailand where cochlear implant surgery was performed between 2016 and 2020.Primary and secondary outcome measuresBaseline characteristics, operation data, complications, audiological outcomes and quality of life were reported.ResultsThis study included 458 patients, and nearly half of the patients were children and adolescents (46.94%). The mean age of the patients was 2.96±5.83 years. At 1 year postoperatively, the mean pure tone average of the hearing threshold in the implanted ear significantly improved from unaided preoperative baseline (mean difference (MD) 64.23 dB HL; 95% CI 59.81 to 68.65; p<0.001). The mean speech recognition threshold also improved (MD 55.96 dB HL; 95% CI 49.50 to 62.42, p<0.001). The quality-of-life scores of the EQ-5D-5L, PedsQL and HUI3 questionnaires at 1 year showed improved mobility (range, 0–5; MD 0.65; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.25; p=0.037), hearing (range, 0–6; MD 0.96; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.61; p=0.006) and speech (range, 0–5; MD 0.44; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.84; p=0.031). Common complications included electrode dislodgement (2.18%), vertigo (1.23%) and meningitis (1.93%).ConclusionsExcellent audiological outcomes and improvement in the quality of life in the mobility, hearing and speech domains were observed in patients who underwent cochlear implantation in Thailand.

Cochlear implantation of a deaf blind patient with mitochondrial cytopathy

1999 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen E. Cullington
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mitochondrial Dna ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
The Body ◽  
Genetic Defects ◽  
Mitochondrial Cytopathy ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Impairment

AbstractGenetic defects of the mitochondrial DNA often cause sensorineural hearing impairment, accompaniment by disorders of organs within the body. This case report describes cochlear implantation of a 33-year-old deaf blind female with mitochondrial cytopathy. The outcome was very successful, and vastly improved quality of life for this patient. Many cases of mitochondrial cytopathy cause progressive deafness; it is, therefore, likely that other patients with this unusual disorder will present for cochlear implant assessment.

Quality of Life after Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: An Updated Comprehensive Cochlear Implant Questionnaire

2016 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund A. Nahm ◽  
Penny Liberatos ◽  
Qiuhu Shi ◽  
Erica Lai ◽  
Ana H. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation

Self-Determination Calibration for Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation

2019 ◽  
pp. 121-154
Author(s):  
Dionysios Politis ◽  
Sophia Aidona ◽  
Petros Stagiopoulos ◽  
Georgios Kyriafinis ◽  
Jannis Constantinidis
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Cognitive Skills ◽  
Therapeutic Approach ◽  
Medical Intervention ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Self Determination

Cochlear implantation is a well-established therapeutic approach for deaf or hearing-impaired patients. After the medical intervention, which aims to restore hearing, subjects undergo rehabilitation procedures in order to cure instructional disadvantages, problematic schooling circumstances, or deficits in their sociability. Essential physical, mental, social, and cognitive skills are taken into perspective, as the prerequisite of a notable aptitude determines the suitability of a subject to get professional and communal roles. Quality of life, as an indicator, provides the metrics that demonstrate the level of adoption with established norms.

Postlingually Deaf Adults of All Ages Derive Equal Benefits from Unilateral Multichannel Cochlear Implant

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 637-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Park ◽  
David B. Shipp ◽  
Joseph M. Chen ◽  
Julian M. Nedzelski ◽  
Vincent Y.W. Lin
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Perceived Quality Of Life ◽  
Deaf Adults

Background: Controversy still exists regarding the impact of age on speech recognition following cochlear implant in postlingually deaf adults. In some studies elderly recipients did not perform as well as younger patients on standard speech recognition tests. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that cochlear implantation improves quality of life, as measured by self-administered questionnaires, but the sample sizes of these studies have been relatively small, thus making age stratification a challenge. Purpose: The primary objective was to assess whether the age at which a patient receives a unilateral cochlear implant affects improvements in speech recognition scores and perceived quality of life. A secondary objective was to determine whether preoperative use of hearing aids correlates with improvement in speech recognition and perceived quality of life after cochlear implantation. Research Design: A retrospective study in a tertiary referral center. Patients: A total of 161 postlingually deaf adults, who were divided based on age (<50, 50–65, >65) and on prior hearing aid(s) use. Intervention: All patients received a unilateral multichannel cochlear implant. Data Collection and Analysis: Speech recognition was quantified by percent correct scores on the Hearing in Noise Test sentences delivered in a quiet setting only (HINT%), and quality of life was quantified by the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) before and 1 yr after cochlear implantation. Results: Speech recognition, as measured by HINT%, improved significantly and to similar extents in all three age groups following cochlear implantation. Similarly, quality of life as quantified by HHI improved markedly and to similar extents in all age groups. Whether hearing aids were used pre-implant, or whether the cochlear implant (CI) was implanted on the same side or contralateral to the hearing aid side, had no substantial effect on the patients’ performances on either speech recognition or quality of life. Moreover, there were no statistically significant correlations between pre-implant speech recognition scores and pre-implant quality of life scores or between postimplant speech recognition scores and postimplant quality of life scores. Conclusion: The findings of the present study demonstrate that cochlear implantation improves HINT% and HHI scores to similar extents across all age groups. This finding suggests that elderly patients may derive speech recognition and quality of life benefits similar to those of younger patients and that age should not be an essential factor in the determination of CI candidacy. Furthermore, prior use of a hearing aid, and its location in relation to the cochlear implant, does not influence the extent of improvement in speech recognition or quality of life measurements following cochlear implantation.

scholarly journals Prospective study on health-related quality of life in patients before and after cochlear implantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Plath ◽  
Theresa Marienfeld ◽  
Matthias Sand ◽  
Philipp S. van de Weyer ◽  
Mark Praetorius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Purpose Assessing cochlear implant (CI)-associated patient outcomes is a focus of implant research. Most studies have analyzed outcomes retrospectively with low patient numbers and few measurement time points. In addition, standardized CI-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments have not been used. To address this, we prospectively assessed HRQoL in patients before and after implantation. Methods We assessed HRQoL using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Hearing Participation Scale (HPS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in 100 deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients (57 unilaterally deaf and 43 bilaterally deaf) before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. We compared the results of unilaterally and bilaterally hearing-impaired patients and patients with or without a hearing aid. Principal component (PCA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were also conducted. Results The NCIQ measured improvements in all 6 domains after CI and correlated well with other QoL instruments. The PCA revealed that the NCIQ can be better explained by physical, physical advanced, and socio-psychological components. The APHAB score ameliorated over time, except for the background noise domain. The overall HPS score improved over time, but the hearing handicap subscore significantly decreased. Sociodemographic influences on the questionnaire scores were relatively weak. Conclusion Assessing HRQoL is essential for quantifying the patient outcome after CI. NCIQ scores in our patient cohort showed improved HRQoL in all domains and we recommend that the NCIQ be used as a first-line questionnaire for assessing QoL in hearing-impaired patients after CI.

scholarly journals Sense of taste in patients after cochlear implantation-preliminary study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1801-7
Author(s):  
Piotr H Skarzynski ◽  
Marcin Wojciechowski ◽  
Magdalena B Skarzynska ◽  
Piotr Fronczak
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Weak Correlation ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Cochlear Implant Surgery ◽  
Taste Disorders ◽  
Preliminary Study

Background: Taste is the leading sense in how we determine the quality of consumed food. Proper gustatory sensation largely determines the well-being and health of an organism, and this affects their quality of life.Objectives: The aim of the present study was to estimate the risk of early taste disorders following implantation surgery. Methods: Twenty patients underwent a taste test before, 1 day after, and 1 month after cochlear implantation. The taste sensations of sweet, sour, salty, and bitter were determined. Results: Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between individual tests among the entire study group. After dividing the respondents into smoking (n=6) and non-smoking (n=14) groups, only a weak correlation (p =0.043) was found between the results of the first and second examination in the smoker group. However, a statistically significant decrease in the number of saline-sensitive (p<0.001) and acid-sensitive (p = 0.042) subjects was observed. Conclusion: These findings suggest that people after a cochlear implant may have transient taste disorders. Taste disorder called dysgeusia may be an early complication after the implantation procedure contributing to deterioration of patients quality of life. Keywords: Sense of taste; taste disorders; cochlear implant surgery; quality of life, partial deafness treatment.

scholarly journals Qualidade de vida de pacientes deficientes auditivos adultos pré e pós-linguais usuários de implante coclear / Quality of life for adult patients of pre-lingual and post-lingual deafness cochlear implantation users

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Thais Rodrigues Talarico ◽  
Cilmara Cristina Alves Costa Levy ◽  
Carmen Lucia Penteado Lancellotti
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Sickness Impact Profile ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Hearing Impairments ◽  
Assess Quality

Objetivo: Avaliar a qualidade de vida (QV) de pacientes adultos com deficiência auditiva pré e pós-lingual usuários de implante coclear (IC). Método: Os pacientes entrevistados foram adultos implantados de 2004 a 2011 no Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia. Eles responderam ao questionário WHOQoL–BREF e, pela analise dos prontuários, foram identificados como pré ou pós-linguais. Desses pacientes, 17 eram pós-linguais e 8 pré-linguais. Resultados: Verificou-se que, no questionário geral, os participantes pré-linguais apresentaram resultado (escore = 77,4) e os pós-linguais, (escore = 76,3). Os melhores resultados foram os dos domínios físico e psicológico, tanto entre os pacientes pré quanto entre os pós-linguais. Conclusões: Podemos constatar que os pacientes pré-linguais apresentam um resultado pouco melhor que os pós-linguais na pontuação total do questionário, mas a análise dos benefícios do IC nos demais domínios mostrou resultados similares nos dois grupos pesquisados.Palavras chave: Implante coclear, Qualidade de vida, Perfil de impacto da doença, Adulto, Pessoas com deficiência auditivaABSTRACTPurpose: Assess quality of life of adult pre and postlingual hearing impaired patients users of cochlear implants. Method: The interviewed patients were adults who had received their implants between 2004 and 2011 at the Department of Otolaryngology. The questionnaire WHOQoL–BREF was applied and patient records were used to check whether the patient had pre or post-lingual hearing loss. Out of the total, there were 17 post-lingual and 8 pre-lingual patients. Results: We have noticed that pre-lingual patients had the score in the general questionnaire of 77.4, whereas post-lingual subjects reached the score 76.3 in the general questionnaire. The domains that showed good results for pre-lingual subjects were physical (score= 82.4) and psychological (score 78.1), and for post-lingual subjects the score for physical and psychological domains were 82.3 and 77.4, respectively. Conclusion: We have observed that pre-lingual patients presented somewhat worse results than post-lingual subjects in the general score, but when the benefits of cochlear implant are taken into account, this difference between the groups practically disappears.Keywords: Cochlear implantation, Quality of life, Sickness impact profile, Adult, Persons with hearing impairments

Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation With Prolonged Time Intervals

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 3195-3207
Author(s):  
Zhikai Zhang ◽  
Chaogang Wei ◽  
Yanmei Zhang ◽  
Zhengang Zeng ◽  
Keli Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Recognition Ability ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Purpose The aim of the study was to assess whether sequential cochlear implantation (CI) with a prolonged interimplant interval ( M = 15.2 years) between the first and second CIs benefited speech recognition and health-related quality of life. Method This prospective study included 14 prelingually deafened participants who received their second CI after a prolonged interimplant interval ( M = 15.2 years). Additionally, speech recognition ability over a 12-month period of bilateral implant use was investigated. The results of the speech recognition test in both quiet and noisy conditions were statistically analyzed for each CI alone and both CIs together. Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire scores were also collected at activation and at 12 months after activation. Results Improvements in speech recognition ability were observed following the use of the first implant alone and with the use of both implants together; however, progress was much slower with the use of the second implant alone, following its introduction. Furthermore, a significant difference in the trajectory of speech recognition ability was observed between the first and the second implanted ear. According to Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire scores, all participants benefitted from bilateral CI after 12 months. Conclusions Prolonged interimplant intervals resulted in asymmetrical speech recognition abilities. A significant improvement in the speech recognition scores was observed with the first implanted ear, and much slower progress was observed with the second implanted ear. However, the “poorer” second implanted ear could provide a considerable beneficial effect on the improved speech recognition and health-related quality of life with the bilateral CI. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12861152

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document