scholarly journals British Sign Language Recognition In The Wild Based On Multi-Class SVM

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Isabelle Olszewska ◽  
M. Quinn
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
British Sign Language ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
British Sign

scholarly journals British Sign Language Recognition via Late Fusion of Computer Vision and Leap Motion with Transfer Learning to American Sign Language

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 5151
Author(s):  
Jordan J. Bird ◽  
Anikó Ekárt ◽  
Diego R. Faria
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
American Sign Language ◽  
Sign Language ◽  
Transfer Learning ◽  
Leap Motion ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
British Sign Language ◽  
Multimodality Approach ◽  
British Sign

In this work, we show that a late fusion approach to multimodality in sign language recognition improves the overall ability of the model in comparison to the singular approaches of image classification (88.14%) and Leap Motion data classification (72.73%). With a large synchronous dataset of 18 BSL gestures collected from multiple subjects, two deep neural networks are benchmarked and compared to derive a best topology for each. The Vision model is implemented by a Convolutional Neural Network and optimised Artificial Neural Network, and the Leap Motion model is implemented by an evolutionary search of Artificial Neural Network topology. Next, the two best networks are fused for synchronised processing, which results in a better overall result (94.44%) as complementary features are learnt in addition to the original task. The hypothesis is further supported by application of the three models to a set of completely unseen data where a multimodality approach achieves the best results relative to the single sensor method. When transfer learning with the weights trained via British Sign Language, all three models outperform standard random weight distribution when classifying American Sign Language (ASL), and the best model overall for ASL classification was the transfer learning multimodality approach, which scored 82.55% accuracy.

INDIAN SIGN LANGUAGE RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING OPENPOSE

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
MALHOTRA POOJA ◽  
K. MANIAR CHIRAG ◽  
V. SANKPAL NIKHIL ◽  
R. THAKKAR HARDIK ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Indian Sign Language

STATIC DEVNAGARI SIGN LANGUAGE RECOGNITION

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
VERMA VERSHA ◽  
PATIL SANDEEP B. ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition

Technological Aids for Deaf and Mute in Modern World

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasu Mehra ◽  
Dhiraj Pandey ◽  
Aayush Rastogi ◽  
Aditya Singh ◽  
Harsh Preet Singh
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Gesture Recognition ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Background Elimination ◽  
Sign Recognition ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Better Than

Background:: People suffering from hearing and speaking disabilities have a few ways of communicating with other people. One of these is to communicate through the use of sign language. Objective:: Developing a system for sign language recognition becomes essential for deaf as well as a mute person. The recognition system acts as a translator between a disabled and an able person. This eliminates the hindrances in exchange of ideas. Most of the existing systems are very poorly designed with limited support for the needs of their day to day facilities. Methods:: The proposed system embedded with gesture recognition capability has been introduced here which extracts signs from a video sequence and displays them on screen. On the other hand, a speech to text as well as text to speech system is also introduced to further facilitate the grieved people. To get the best out of human computer relationship, the proposed solution consists of various cutting-edge technologies and Machine Learning based sign recognition models which have been trained by using Tensor Flow and Keras library. Result:: The proposed architecture works better than several gesture recognition techniques like background elimination and conversion to HSV because of sharply defined image provided to the model for classification. The results of testing indicate reliable recognition systems with high accuracy that includes most of the essential and necessary features for any deaf and dumb person in his/her day to day tasks. Conclusion:: It’s the need of current technological advances to develop reliable solutions which can be deployed to assist deaf and dumb people to adjust to normal life. Instead of focusing on a standalone technology, a plethora of them have been introduced in this proposed work. Proposed Sign Recognition System is based on feature extraction and classification. The trained model helps in identification of different gestures.

Indian Sign Language Recognition on PYNQ Board

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhendra Singh ◽  
G. N. Rathna ◽  
Vivek Singhal
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Hand Gesture ◽  
Language Recognition ◽  
Sign Language Recognition ◽  
Hand Gestures ◽  
Depth Images ◽  
Kinect Camera ◽  
Impaired People ◽  
Web Camera ◽  
Indian Sign Language

Introduction: Sign language is the only way to communicate for speech-impaired people. But this sign language is not known to normal people so this is the cause of barrier in communicating. This is the problem faced by speech impaired people. In this paper, we have presented our solution which captured hand gestures with Kinect camera and classified the hand gesture into its correct symbol. Method: We used Kinect camera not the ordinary web camera because the ordinary camera does not capture its 3d orientation or depth of an image from camera however Kinect camera can capture 3d image and this will make classification more accurate. Result: Kinect camera will produce a different image for hand gestures for ‘2’ and ‘V’ and similarly for ‘1’ and ‘I’ however, normal web camera will not be able to distinguish between these two. We used hand gesture for Indian sign language and our dataset had 46339, RGB images and 46339 depth images. 80% of the total images were used for training and the remaining 20% for testing. In total 36 hand gestures were considered to capture alphabets and alphabets from A-Z and 10 for numeric, 26 for digits from 0-9 were considered to capture alphabets and Keywords. Conclusion: Along with real-time implementation, we have also shown the comparison of the performance of the various machine learning models in which we have found out the accuracy of CNN on depth- images has given the most accurate performance than other models. All these resulted were obtained on PYNQ Z2 board.

Crosslinguistic similarity and variation in the simultaneous morphology of sign languages

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 571-608
Author(s):  
Diane Brentari ◽  
Laura Horton ◽  
Susan Goldin-Meadow
Keyword(s):  
American Sign Language ◽  
Sign Language ◽  
Optimality Theory ◽  
Sign Languages ◽  
British Sign Language ◽  
Verb Phrases ◽  
Classifier Predicates ◽  
Crosslinguistic Variation ◽  
Hong Kong Sign Language ◽  
British Sign

Abstract Two differences between signed and spoken languages that have been widely discussed in the literature are: the degree to which morphology is expressed simultaneously (rather than sequentially), and the degree to which iconicity is used, particularly in predicates of motion and location, often referred to as classifier predicates. In this paper we analyze a set of properties marking agency and number in four sign languages for their crosslinguistic similarities and differences regarding simultaneity and iconicity. Data from American Sign Language (ASL), Italian Sign Language (LIS), British Sign Language (BSL), and Hong Kong Sign Language (HKSL) are analyzed. We find that iconic, cognitive, phonological, and morphological factors contribute to the distribution of these properties. We conduct two analyses—one of verbs and one of verb phrases. The analysis of classifier verbs shows that, as expected, all four languages exhibit many common formal and iconic properties in the expression of agency and number. The analysis of classifier verb phrases (VPs)—particularly, multiple-verb predicates—reveals (a) that it is grammatical in all four languages to express agency and number within a single verb, but also (b) that there is crosslinguistic variation in expressing agency and number across the four languages. We argue that this variation is motivated by how each language prioritizes, or ranks, several constraints. The rankings can be captured in Optimality Theory. Some constraints in this account, such as a constraint to be redundant, are found in all information systems and might be considered non-linguistic; however, the variation in constraint ranking in verb phrases reveals the grammatical and arbitrary nature of linguistic systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document