scholarly journals Pharmacological Tests in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Gourraud ◽  
Jason G Andrade ◽  
Laurent Macle ◽  
Blandine Mondésert ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation ◽  
Pharmacological Tests ◽  
Percutaneous Catheter ◽  
Invasive Management

The invasive management of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considerably changed by the identification of major sites of AF initiation and/or maintenance within the pulmonary vein antra. Percutaneous catheter ablation of these targets has become the standard of care for sustained maintenance of sinus rhythm. Long-term failure of ablation is related to an inability to create a durable transmural lesion or to identify all of the non-pulmonary vein arrhythmia triggers. Pharmacological challenges during catheter ablation have been suggested to improve outcomes in both paroxysmal and persistent AF. Herein we review the mechanism and evidence for the use of pharmacological adjuncts during the catheter ablation of AF.

PT191 Invasive Management of Iatrogenic Pulmonary Vein Stenosis in Patients After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Global Heart ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e155
Author(s):  
L.A. Gellér ◽  
G. Széplaki ◽  
K.V. Nagy ◽  
T. Tahin ◽  
N. Szegedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Stenosis ◽  
Vein Stenosis ◽  
Invasive Management

scholarly journals Identifying patients with atrial fibrillation recurrences after two pulmonary vein isolation procedures

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001718
Author(s):  
Bart A Mulder ◽  
Meelad I H Al-Jazairi ◽  
Federico T Magni ◽  
Hessel F Groenveld ◽  
Robert G Tieleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Atrium Volume

IntroductionPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an important treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, many patients need more than one procedure to maintain long-term sinus rhythm. Even after two PVIs some may suffer from AF recurrences. We aimed to identify characteristics of patients who fail after two PVI procedures.Methods and resultsWe included 557 consecutive patients undergoing a first PVI procedure with a second-generation 28 mm cryoballoon. Follow-up procedures were performed using radiofrequency ablation targeting reconnected PVs only. Recurrent AF was defined as any episode of AF lasting >30 s on ECG or 24 hour Holter monitoring performed at 3, 6 and 12 months post procedure. Mean age was 59.1±10.2 years, 383 (68.8%) were male, 448 (80.4%) had paroxysmal AF and the most common underlying condition was hypertension (36.6%). A total of 140/557 (25.1%) patients underwent redo procedure with PVI only. Of these patients 45 (32.4%) had recurrence of AF. These patients were comparable regarding age and sex to those in sinus rhythm after one or two procedures. Multivariate logistic regression showed that non-paroxysmal AF (OR 1.08 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.15), estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99), bundle branch block (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.58), heart failure (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.58) and Left Atrium Volume Index (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08) were associated with AF recurrence after two PVIs. The area under the curve for the identified risk factors was 0.74.ConclusionsUsing a PVI-only approach, recurrence of AF after two AF ablation procedures is associated with more advanced underlying disease and persistent types of AF.

scholarly journals Recent advances in rhythm control for atrial fibrillation

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Bond ◽  
Brian Olshansky ◽  
Paulus Kirchhof
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Rate Control ◽  
Rhythm Control ◽  
Management Problem ◽  
Recent Trial ◽  
Control Therapy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a difficult management problem. The restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm—rhythm control therapy—can markedly improve symptoms and haemodynamics for patients who have paroxysmal or persistent AF, but some patients fare well with rate control alone. Sinus rhythm can be achieved with anti-arrhythmic drugs or electrical cardioversion, but the maintenance of sinus rhythm without recurrence is more challenging. Catheter ablation of the AF triggers is more effective than anti-arrhythmic drugs at maintaining sinus rhythm. Whilst pulmonary vein isolation is an effective strategy, other ablation targets are being evaluated to improve sinus rhythm maintenance, especially in patients with chronic forms of AF. Previously extensive ablation strategies have been used for patients with persistent AF, but a recent trial has shown that pulmonary vein isolation without additional ablation lesions is associated with outcomes similar to those of more extensive ablation. This has led to an increase in catheter-based technology to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation. Furthermore, a combination of anti-arrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation seems useful to improve the effectiveness of rhythm control therapy. Two large ongoing trials evaluate whether a modern rhythm control therapy can improve prognosis in patients with AF.

Long‐term outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation using second‐generation cryoballoon during atrial fibrillation ablation

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 910-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugur Canpolat ◽  
Duygu Kocyigit ◽  
Muhammed Ulvi Yalcin ◽  
Cem Coteli ◽  
Yusuf Ziya Sener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

scholarly journals The Electrophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation: From Basic Mechanisms to Catheter Ablation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Ioannidis ◽  
Theodoros Zografos ◽  
Evangelia Christoforatou ◽  
Konstantinos Kouvelas ◽  
Andreas Tsoumeleas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Basic Science ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Atrial Myocardium ◽  
Pathophysiological Mechanisms ◽  
Basic Science Knowledge

The electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) has always been a deep mystery in understanding this complex arrhythmia. The pathophysiological mechanisms of AF are complex and often remain unclear despite extensive research. Therefore, the implementation of basic science knowledge to clinical practice is challenging. After more than 20 years, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone ablation strategy for maintaining the sinus rhythm (SR). However, there is no doubt that, in many cases, especially in persistent and long-standing persistent AF, PVI is not enough, and eventually, the restoration of SR occurs after additional intervention in the rest of the atrial myocardium. Substrate mapping is a modern challenge as it can reveal focal sources or rotational activities that may be responsible for maintaining AF. Whether these areas are actually the cause of the AF maintenance is unknown. If this really happens, then the targeted ablation may be the solution; otherwise, more rough techniques such as atrial compartmentalization may prove to be more effective. In this article, we attempt a broad review of the known pathophysiological mechanisms of AF, and we present the recent efforts of advanced technology initially to reveal the electrical impulse during AF and then to intervene effectively with ablation.

scholarly journals Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion

2021 ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
Adi Lador ◽  
Miguel Valderrábano
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Left Atrium ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation ◽  
Autonomic Nerves ◽  
Ethanol Infusion ◽  
Mitral Isthmus

Catheter ablation has become a cornerstone treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation is the accepted approach for paroxysmal AF ablation, but it is less effective for persistent AF. The vein of Marshall (VOM) is located in the epicardial left atrium and can be a source of AF triggers as well as a tract for autonomic nerves. It directly communicates with the underlying myocardium, including the left atrial ridge and the posterior mitral isthmus. This review discusses the latest evidence regarding the mechanisms, procedural aspects, and outcomes of VOM ethanol infusion when used as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent AF.

P6597Long-term impact of catheter ablation on growth differentiation factor-15 and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Bin Waleed ◽  
Y L Xia ◽  
L J Gao ◽  
Y Xiaomeng ◽  
G Tse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Inflammatory Biomarkers ◽  
Growth Differentiation Factor 15 ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Differentiation Factor ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background There is increasing evidence that inflammatory biomarkers growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) appear to be associated with stroke and adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, long-term impact of catheter ablation (CA) on GDF-15 and NLR is still unknown. Objective To evaluate the long-term change in GDF-15 and NLR after CA in paroxysmal AF patients. Methods A total of 58 paroxysmal AF patients were consecutively enrolled to perform CA. The inflammatory biomarkers GDF-15 and NLR were measured at baseline and 6-months postablation. Results All patients except one could complete 6-Months follow up. Fifty (87.7%) patients maintained sinus rhythm (SR group) and seven (12.3%) patients sustained AF recurrence (AFR group). No significant difference was noted in clinical and procedural characteristics between two groups (p>0.05), except mean fluoroscopy time (minutes 22±11.7 vs. 13±5.3, p=0.001) significantly longer in AFR than SR group. The GDF-15 (pg/ml 195±57 vs. 216±88, p=0.398), and NLR (% 1.8 (1.3–3) vs. 2.6 (1.4–3.4), p=0.395) were comparable at baseline in both SR and AFR groups respectively. At 6-months postablation, GDF-15 (pg/ml 133±41 vs. 195±57, p<0.001), and NLR (% 1.6 (1.1–2) vs. 1.8 (1.3–3), p=0.004) were significant deceased compared to baseline levels in SR group. However, GDF-15 (pg/ml 139±86 vs. 216±88, p=0.064), and NLR (% 1.6 (1.2–3) vs. 2.6 (1.4–3.4), p=0.398) biomarkers remained comparable to baseline level in AFR group (p>0.05) Conclusion Inflammatory biomarkers; GDF-15 and NLR significantly decreased at long-term on successful maintenance of sinus rhythm by CA in paroxysmal AF patients. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document