scholarly journals The Electrophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation: From Basic Mechanisms to Catheter Ablation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Ioannidis ◽  
Theodoros Zografos ◽  
Evangelia Christoforatou ◽  
Konstantinos Kouvelas ◽  
Andreas Tsoumeleas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Basic Science ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Atrial Myocardium ◽  
Pathophysiological Mechanisms ◽  
Basic Science Knowledge

The electrophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) has always been a deep mystery in understanding this complex arrhythmia. The pathophysiological mechanisms of AF are complex and often remain unclear despite extensive research. Therefore, the implementation of basic science knowledge to clinical practice is challenging. After more than 20 years, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone ablation strategy for maintaining the sinus rhythm (SR). However, there is no doubt that, in many cases, especially in persistent and long-standing persistent AF, PVI is not enough, and eventually, the restoration of SR occurs after additional intervention in the rest of the atrial myocardium. Substrate mapping is a modern challenge as it can reveal focal sources or rotational activities that may be responsible for maintaining AF. Whether these areas are actually the cause of the AF maintenance is unknown. If this really happens, then the targeted ablation may be the solution; otherwise, more rough techniques such as atrial compartmentalization may prove to be more effective. In this article, we attempt a broad review of the known pathophysiological mechanisms of AF, and we present the recent efforts of advanced technology initially to reveal the electrical impulse during AF and then to intervene effectively with ablation.

scholarly journals Recent advances in rhythm control for atrial fibrillation

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Bond ◽  
Brian Olshansky ◽  
Paulus Kirchhof
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Rate Control ◽  
Rhythm Control ◽  
Management Problem ◽  
Recent Trial ◽  
Control Therapy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a difficult management problem. The restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm—rhythm control therapy—can markedly improve symptoms and haemodynamics for patients who have paroxysmal or persistent AF, but some patients fare well with rate control alone. Sinus rhythm can be achieved with anti-arrhythmic drugs or electrical cardioversion, but the maintenance of sinus rhythm without recurrence is more challenging. Catheter ablation of the AF triggers is more effective than anti-arrhythmic drugs at maintaining sinus rhythm. Whilst pulmonary vein isolation is an effective strategy, other ablation targets are being evaluated to improve sinus rhythm maintenance, especially in patients with chronic forms of AF. Previously extensive ablation strategies have been used for patients with persistent AF, but a recent trial has shown that pulmonary vein isolation without additional ablation lesions is associated with outcomes similar to those of more extensive ablation. This has led to an increase in catheter-based technology to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation. Furthermore, a combination of anti-arrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation seems useful to improve the effectiveness of rhythm control therapy. Two large ongoing trials evaluate whether a modern rhythm control therapy can improve prognosis in patients with AF.

scholarly journals Pharmacological Tests in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Gourraud ◽  
Jason G Andrade ◽  
Laurent Macle ◽  
Blandine Mondésert ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation ◽  
Pharmacological Tests ◽  
Percutaneous Catheter ◽  
Invasive Management

The invasive management of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considerably changed by the identification of major sites of AF initiation and/or maintenance within the pulmonary vein antra. Percutaneous catheter ablation of these targets has become the standard of care for sustained maintenance of sinus rhythm. Long-term failure of ablation is related to an inability to create a durable transmural lesion or to identify all of the non-pulmonary vein arrhythmia triggers. Pharmacological challenges during catheter ablation have been suggested to improve outcomes in both paroxysmal and persistent AF. Herein we review the mechanism and evidence for the use of pharmacological adjuncts during the catheter ablation of AF.

scholarly journals Kardia Mobile and ISTEL HR applicability in clinical practice: A comparison of Kardia Mobile, ISTEL HR and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram records in 98 consecutive patients of a tertiary cardiovascular care centre

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Krzowski ◽  
Kamila Skoczylas ◽  
Gabriela Osak ◽  
Natalia Żurawska ◽  
Michał Peller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Everyday Practice ◽  
Portable Devices ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Cardiovascular Care

Abstract Aims Mobile, portable ECG-recorders allow the assessment of heart rhythm in out-of-hospital conditions and may prove useful for monitoring patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, the effectiveness of these portable devices has not been tested in everyday practice. Methods and results A group of 98 consecutive cardiology patients (62 males [63%], mean age 69 ± 12.9 years) were included in an academic care centre. For each patient, a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (SE), as well as a Kardia Mobile 6L (KM) and Istel (IS) HR-2000 ECG were performed. Two groups of experienced physycians analyzed obtained recordings. After analyzing ECG tracings from SE, KM, and IS, quality was marked as good in 82%, 80%, and 72% of patients, respectively (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between devices in terms of detecting sinus rhythm (SE [60%, n = 59], KM [58%, n = 56], and IS [61%, n = 60]; SE vs KM p = 0.53; SE vs IS p = 0.76) and atrial fibrillation (SE [22%, n = 22], KM [22%, n = 21], and IS [18%, n = 18]; (SE vs KM p = 0.65; SE vs IS = 0.1). KM had a sensitivity of 88.1% and a specificity of 89.7% for diagnosing sinus rhythm. IS showed 91.5% and 84.6% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The sensitivity of KM in detecting atrial fibrillation was higher than IS (86.4% vs. 77.3%), but their specificity was comparable (97.4% vs. 98.7%). Conclusion Novel, portable devices are useful in showing sinus rhythm and detecting atrial fibrillation in clinical practice. However, ECG measurements concerning conduction and repolarisation should be clarified with a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram.

scholarly journals Persistent atrial fibrillation presenting in sinus rhythm: Pulmonary vein isolation versus pulmonary vein isolation plus electrogram-guided ablation

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 501-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic A. Sebag ◽  
Najia Chaachoui ◽  
Nick W. Linton ◽  
Sana Amraoui ◽  
James Harrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document