scholarly journals KULTŪRINIŲ IR EKONOMINIŲ VERTYBIŲ KŪRIMO YPATUMAI

Problemos ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Valdas Pruskus
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Cultural Values ◽  
Consumer Behaviour ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Cultural Value ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Main Attention ◽  
Rational Decision Making ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Creativity Economy

Straipsnyje aptariamas kūrybiškumo supratimas. Jis nagrinėjamas kaip individo racionalių sprendimų priėmimo procesas ir kaip kūrėjo (menininko) iracionalių galių pasireiškimas. Analizuojamos kultūrinės vertybės kūrimo (materializacijos) sąnaudos ir pajamų už meno kūrinius didinimo būdai. Remiantis trimis kūrybiškumo dėmenimis (vaizduotė, sveika nuovoka, skonis), išryškinami kūrybiškumo ypatumai kuriant kultūrines ir ekonomines vertybes. Parodoma, kad ekonominių vertybių kūrėjo veiksmus rinka gerokai daugiau varžo nei menininko. Todėl nenuostabu, kad jo veiksmai kuriant ekonomines vertybes yra labiau racionalizuoti. Vis dėlto ir jie ne visada užtikrina sėkmę, kadangi neįmanoma atspėti ir tuo labiau tiksliai nusakyti vartotojų elgsenos rinkoje. Tas pasakytina tiek apie ekonomines, tiek apie kultūrines vertybes, kurių žmonės siekia.Reikšminiai žodžiai: kūrybiškumas, racionalus sprendimų priėmimas, vaizduotė, skonis, vartotojų elgsena rinkoje. THE PECULIARITIES OF THE CREATION OF CULTURAL AND ECONOMICAL VALUESValdas Pruskus SummaryDespite the recognition of the importance of culture in modern society the main attention is paid to the production of economical goods. In its turn this production requires from economical subjects specific things (proper abilities and skills) and puts its own requirements, including that of creativity. Economy and culture, though different as such are the two most important fields of human activity, so it’s possible to assume that expression of creativity distinguishes itself by certain originality. The author discusses creativity as the process of making rational decisions by an individual and as manifestation of irrational powers of an artist (creator), analyses costs of creation of a cultural value. Making distinction between three elements of creativity (imagination, sound keenness of wit, taste) peculiarities of creativity are revealed in the creation economical and cultural values. Keywords: creativity, rational decision making, imagination, taste, consumer behaviour in the market. 

scholarly journals KULTŪRINIO KAPITALO RAIŠKOS YPATUMAI

Problemos ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 48-62
Author(s):  
Valdas Pruskus
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Values ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Consumer Behaviour ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cultural Value ◽  
Main Attention ◽  
Culture Capital ◽  
Works Of Art ◽  
Rational Decisions

Straipsnyje aptariamos sociologinės ir ekonominės kultūrinio kapitalo sampratos. Analizuojami kultūrinio kapitalo egzistavimo pavidalai ir jų ypatumai, kultūrinio ir natūraliojo kapitalo panašumai bei skirtumai. Kultūrinis kapitalas suprantamas kaip kultūrinių gėrybių (kultūros produktų ir paslaugų) šaltinis, kuris jas teikia dabar gyvenantiems ir privalės teikti ateityje. Kaip pavienis individas ar visuomenė, mes galime pabloginti arba pagerinti kultūrinio kapitalo būklę. Siekdami savo asmeninių ir visuomeninių tikslų, stengiamės kultūrinį kapitalą valdyti. Parodoma, kad jis gali esmingai veikti ekonomikos raidą, tapdamas instrumentu, leidžiančiu ekonomikos „paraiškas“ (pasiekimus) kultūriškai pripažinti, įsisavinti ir atitinkamai išreikšti, taigi kurti aukštesnio lygio socialinio gyvenimo kokybę. Kaip ekosistemos palaiko biosferą, taip kultūrinis kapitalas ir jo infrastruktūros palaiko socialinį universumą (visuomenės stabilumą), kartu sudarydami sąlygas esmingai plėtoti ekonomikos galias.Prasminiai žodžiai: kultūrinis kapitalas, natūralus kapitalas, žmogiškasis kapitalas, kultūrinė įvairovė, socialinio teisingumo rodikliai. CULTURE CAPITAL AND PECULARITIES OF ITS EXPRESSIONValdas Pruskus Summary Despite the recognition of the importance of culture in modern society the main attention is paid to the production of economical goods. In its turn it requires from economical subjects specific things (corresponding abilities and skills) and puts its own requirements, including that of creativity. On the other hand it’s obvious that it is necessary in producing not only economical but also cultural values (products and services). Economy and culture, though different as such are the two most important fields of human activity, so it is possible to assume that expression of creativity distinguishes itself by certain originality. The author investigates creativity as the process of making rational decisions by an individual and as manifestation of irrational powers of an artist (creator), analyses costs of cretion of a cultural value as well as ways of the increase of income for works of art. On the ground of the three elements of creativity (imagination, sound keenness of wit, taste) peculiarities of creativity are revealed in creating economical and cultural values.Keywords: cultural and economical values, creativity, making rational decisions, imagination, taste, consumer behaviour in the market.

Resource-rational decision making

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Rahul Bhui ◽  
Lucy Lai ◽  
Samuel J Gershman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Rational Decision Making

Author reply: Empathy Does Provide Rational Support for Decisions. But Is It the Right Decision?

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz Breithaupt
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Author Reply ◽  
Rational Decision Making ◽  
Rational Support ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

This article examines the relation of empathy and rational judgment. When people observe a conflict most are quick to side with one of the parties. Once a side has been taken, empathy with that party further solidifies this choice. Hence, it will be suggested that empathy is not neutral to judgment and rational decision-making. This does not mean, however, that the one who empathizes will necessarily have made the best choice.

Evidential Decision Theory

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Theory ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Evidential Decision Theory ◽  
Radical Theory ◽  
Rational Decision Making ◽  
Evidential Decision ◽  
Theoretic Foundations

Evidential Decision Theory is a radical theory of rational decision-making. It recommends that instead of thinking about what your decisions *cause*, you should think about what they *reveal*. This Element explains in simple terms why thinking in this way makes a big difference, and argues that doing so makes for *better* decisions. An appendix gives an intuitive explanation of the measure-theoretic foundations of Evidential Decision Theory.

Toward More Rational Decision Making

1988 ◽  
pp. 257-283
Author(s):  
Michael R. Gottfredson ◽  
Don M. Gottfredson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Rational Decision Making

scholarly journals The Psychological Puzzle: Contributing Factors to the Top-Down Politicization of Intelligence

Elements ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Moretti
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Intelligence Community ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Symbiotic Relationship ◽  
Rational Decision ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Political Leaders ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Rational Decision Making

Policy and intelligence are intimately intertwined. Policymakers need intelligence to make decisions, while the intelligence community derives significance from its ability to provide policy makers with reliable information. In this symbiotic relationship, it is healthy for intelligence consumers to at times check and direct the work of intelligence producers. However, if undertaken maliciously, this checking mechanism manifests as top-down politicization. Here, leaders use intelligence post facto to legitimize their policies instead of using it to guide them, reversing the rational decision-making process. Certain factors may compel leaders to manipulate intelligence to reflect their policy preferences. This essay demonstrates how three distinct processes of top-down politicization can arise from ambiguous evidence, the psychology of intelligence consumers, and the nature of the leaders’ political positions and responsibilities. It then proceeds to argue that political leaders’ psychology is the most potent source of top-down politicization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document