scholarly journals Audit Partner’s Involvement in Audit Process, as an Indicator of Audit Quality

Author(s):  
Darius Vaicekauskas

Audit quality is determined by the criteria of the audit firm and the audit engagement team. One of the most important criteria of the audit engagement team is the involvement of the responsible engagement partner (hereinafter - partner) in the audit. As an executive of an audit firm, the partner is responsible for the quality control system within the audit firm, creating a "tone from the top" and presenting himself and his/her behavior, including involvement in the audit process, as an example for other less experienced audit engagement team members. This article examines the role of the partner in the audit engagement team structure to achieve audit quality, introduces the issue of partner involvement in the audit process, and proposes suggested indicators that can help assess the level of partner involement in the audit process for audit quality reviewers.

Author(s):  
Khansa Shahibah ◽  
Bambang Hariadi ◽  
Zaki Baridwan

The objective of this research id to assess the effect of Quality Control System elements. i.e. relevant ethical terms and independency, on audit quality and to identify the moderating role of professional skepticism on the effect of quality control system on audit quality. The population of this research auditor working in Indonesian Big Ten public accounting firms, from which 252 auditors were selected as the sample. Using PLS-based SEM in SmartPLS, this study finds that relevant ethical terms and independency affect audit quality and that professional skepticism moderates the effect of independence on audit quality, but it does not moderate the effect of relevant ethical terms on audit quality.


Manajerial ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Sartono

<p align="justify">This research will examine the views from stakeholders on the quality of audits based on issues of expertise and professionalism of auditors, audits commercialization  and transparency the audit. This study focuses attention on the response from implementation of audits quality regulations according to the company’s audits, the audit committee and investors. The focus of this research is an analysis of research by identifying four major drivers of audit quality, namely: culture in an audit firm; skills and personal qualities of audit partners and staff; the effectiveness of the audit process; the reliability and usefulness of audit reporting. In this study also identifies a number of factors that affect the quality of audit beyond the control of the auditor, namely: the approach taken by management; the contribution made by the audit committee; role of shareholders and commentators; role as a driver of audit quality litigation; regulatory approaches; the pressure caused by the acceleration reports. The results showed that the regulatory bodies and professionals involved in the management and improvement of audit quality to make efforts to improve the tarnished image, increase its legitimacy and reputation as well as the dominance of responses raised concerns about potential damage to the profession.</p>


Auditor ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 20-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Н. Лосева ◽  
N. Loseva

Th e article examines the concept of audit quality and its key elements, the requirements of international audit standards for audit quality control, elements of the quality control system, professional ethics and audit quality, and the content of the principle of independence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 8331
Author(s):  
Hang Yu ◽  
Senlai Zhu ◽  
Jie Yang

Nowadays, blockchain technology is expected to promote the quality control of traditional industry due to its traceability, transparency and non-tampering characteristics. Although blockchain could offer the traditional industry new energy, there are still some predictable difficulties in the early stage of its application, such as the structure of the blockchain-based system, the role of regulators in the system and high transaction fee by block packing. In this paper, we establish a pioneering quality control system for the green composite wind turbine blade supply chain based on blockchain technology. Firstly, the framework of this system is proposed to ensure that the quality of the product could not only be examined and verified by regulator, but also be monitored by other related nodes. Next, we develop a new way to store the data by hash fingerprint and the cost of transaction fees is significantly reduced in the case of a large amount of data. Then, the information on-chain method is developed to realize the data traceability of each node. At last, the tests of this system are carried out to prove its validity, the satisfactory results are obtained and information supervision and sharing role of the regulators are discussed.


Author(s):  
V. N. Deynega ◽  
S. V. Kurakova

This article examines the objectives, basic principles, the procedure for developing internal audit standards (in audit organizations) when applying ISAs in the practice of the Russian audit. We analyzed the theses of the Federal rules of auditing standards which were used before 2017, and the theses of ISQC 1 «Quality control for firms that perform audits and reviews of financial statements and other assurance and related services engagements» in order to find out the difference between their requirements to internal audit standards. We considered the role of internal audit standards (in an audit organization) when building up the quality control system in consideration with ISQC and defined the basic requirements internal audit standards should meet according to quality control system conception.


2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-115
Author(s):  
O. E. Lubenchenko

New Laws of Ukraine “On Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine” and “On Audit of Financial Statements and Auditing” require the enhanced responsibility of auditors for auditing results. Creation of the body of public oversight over the auditing requires the continuing improvement of the internal control system through implementing internal company standards. The article proposes the elaborated procedure and key components of the internal standard “The Policy and Procedure of the System for Internal Quality Control of Audit Services”. The structure of the internal audit includes the following sections: glossary of terminology; leadership responsibilities for quality within the audit firm; ethical requirements; acceptance and continuance of client relationships; human resources; engagement performance (work documents on performance of previous engagement procedures, on planning of auditing engagements, on final procedures, other work documents); monitoring of quality control system and individual engagements; appendices. For understanding of International Standards of Auditing, the preamble of the internal standard should contain key notions and definitions. An important aspect is recording of issues creating the appropriate environment for control: style and essential principles of the audit firm management; organizational structure and specialization of the audit firm; sharing of responsibility and authorities of management and other personnel; personnel management policy (requirements for recruitment and dismissal, professional development, assessment of work quality, system of rewards). The audit firm sets and records the procedures to be applied to assure the compliance with ethical principles (honesty, objectivity, professional competency, confidentiality, professional behavior), and for identification and prevention of threats to its independence. The general procedures for acceptance are as follows: assessment of the firm’s resources for engagement performance, assessment of the client’s integrity, reaching agreement on the engagement terms and continuance of client relationship. The section “Human resources” of the internal standard contains the procedures for personnel recruitment, continuance of cooperation with personnel, assessment of their competence and capacities to perform auditing engagements, use of disciplinary actions (if necessary). The section “Engagement performance” of the internal standard includes the description of policies and procedures for collecting sufficient and acceptable audit evidence in order to form the auditor’ opinion about financial statements. For companies with public significance, in conformity with the law, the review of auditor’s report is envisaged, and the structure of the reviewer’s report is proposed. Once the reviewer’s report is received by the audit firm and differences in opinions are settled, the auditor’s report on financial statements, the supplementary report to the auditing committee, and the report to supervisory bodies (if necessary) will be made. The section “Monitoring of the internal standard” includes recording of procedures for monitoring of quality control system (the existence of quality control system and its compliance with current legal requirements, International Standards of Auditing and internal standards). Use of the internal standard “The Policy and Procedure of the System for Internal Quality Control of Audit Services” can essentially increase the quality of auditing and other engagements on ensuring confidence and related services.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-90
Author(s):  
Hafidz Ridloi

Purpose - This study aims to assess the role of CPA Firms related to the quality control system in maintaining the professional skepticism level of auditors affecting the quality of audits provided by the Public Accountants.Method - Population and samples used in this research were the whole auditors working for the CPA Firms in Semarang. The researcher collected the samples using a purposive sampling technique. The number of samples in this study was 31 auditors. The researcher collected the data using online questionnaires sent through email to each CPA Firm. Data analysis was conducted using a Structural Equation Modeling - Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) with WarpPLS 4.0 software.Result - The results of this study indicated that the quality control system did not affect the auditor’s professional skepticism. Peer review did not moderate the quality control system. The auditor's professional skepticism variable has a significant effect on audit quality. Then, quality control system did not affect audit quality through auditor’s professional skepticism.Implication - To maintain audit quality, CPA Firms in Semarang needs to improve the competence, experience, and professionalism of auditors performing the audit assignments that the professional skepticism of the concerned personnel can be properly maintained.Originality - This study has presented a moderating variable in the relationship between peer review and quality control system affecting professional skepticism.


2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
O. V. Shchyrska ◽  
Ye. O. Kushnir

Statements of the key legal acts regulating quality control of audit services in Ukraine are studied. A review of studies on quality control, conducted by distinguished national scientists, is made.  It enables to highlight controversial and problematic aspects crucial for elaborating methodological and organizational support to high quality external control over the operation of the quality control system at audit entities in Ukraine. It is shown that the auditing practice in Ukraine is subject to a series of normative and legal acts laying methodological grounds for the quality control system in audit firms and determining its operational norms. Main documents (provisions, resolutions etc.) issued by the Audit Chamber of Ukraine, setting the regulatory framework for quality control of audit services and binding for audit entities in Ukraine are highlighted. Bodies charged with quality control of audit services in Ukraine and their authorities are shown. The organizational and methodological framework for the elaboration and implementation of the quality control system in audit and financial reporting reviews are highlighted. It is emphasized that the International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services Pronouncements specify the responsibility of an audit firm for the elaborated and implemented quality control system for audit and financial reporting review, and other assurance and related services. From the perspective of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services Pronouncements it is substantiated that an audit firm needs to set and maintain the quality control system that has to include the policies and procedures studied in this article. An overview of inspections of the quality control system in 2016 and their results in Ukraine is made by Ukrainian region. An analysis of the controlling bodies’ performance is made by number of inspections devoted to quality control system. The results of the study allow for making conclusions about the performance of the external control over the operation of the quality system in audit entities inspected. Propositions on the fields of further studies aimed to clarify theoretical definitions and formulate practical recommendations on organization and performance of inspections are given.             


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document