Modern methods of bacteria detection and identification

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
Dorota Żabicka ◽  
Elżbieta Literacka
2009 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. West ◽  
Timothy W. Hanks ◽  
Rhett T. Watson

Author(s):  
V. G. Germanchuk ◽  
D. V. Utkin ◽  
S. A. Shcherbakova

The risk of occurrence of emergency situations different in their character is still a pressing issue for all the states of the world's community, including the Russian Federation. Nowadays, development of the modern methods and tools for rapid toxin detection and identification holds a high position in biological safety system. Specified means for biological toxin detection do not comply with the requirements of rapidness. One of the prospective means for rapid toxin indication is immune-chromatographic, immunochip, and immunosensor test-systems with high sensitivity, differentiation capacity and expression. In this review described are some up-to-date foreign and home-grown technologies for rapid toxin indication.


1997 ◽  
Vol 378 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léon C. P. M. Schenkels ◽  
Els Walgreen-Weterings ◽  
Lauran C. J. M. Oomen ◽  
Jan G. M. Bolscher ◽  
Enno C. I. Veerman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C.D. Humphrey ◽  
T.L. Cromeans ◽  
E.H. Cook ◽  
D.W. Bradley

There is a variety of methods available for the rapid detection and identification of viruses by electron microscopy as described in several reviews. The predominant techniques are classified as direct electron microscopy (DEM), immune electron microscopy (IEM), liquid phase immune electron microscopy (LPIEM) and solid phase immune electron microscopy (SPIEM). Each technique has inherent strengths and weaknesses. However, in recent years, the most progress for identifying viruses has been realized by the utilization of SPIEM.


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Robert C. Eyre ◽  
Ann A. Kiessling ◽  
Thomas E. Mullen ◽  
Rachel L. Kiessling

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document