scholarly journals Russian military expenditure: What's behind the curtain?

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasily Zatsepin

The article views the Russian defense budget as a representation of national strategic interests, priorities, and policies. Although Russia conforms to the United Nations' statistical standard for reporting military expenditure, several budget categories are hidden in other parts of the federal budget. Transparency in defense spending has been decreasing steadily. The budgeting process itself is cumbersome and opaque. Parliamentary control over the budget process and control over the execution of defense appropriations are limited. Importantly, frequent changes in the system of national accounting impede historical comparisons. The study finds that the low quality of defense management, dominated by members of the military-industrial complex, is a major problem locking Russian defense policy in an institutional trap.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-247
Author(s):  
M. Batkovskiy ◽  
P. Kravchuk ◽  
V. Sudakov

The development of diversification of integrated structures of the military–industrial complex, as well as the need for their modernization in order to accelerate innovative development, necessitate the improvement of their management efficiency. The most important direction for solving this problem is the creation of information systems for managing diversification activities. The relevance of the study, the results of which are presented in the article, is determined by the urgent need to improve the theory and tools of managing information support in modern conditions. Previous studies by various scientists of the process under consideration were focused on the economic conditions for the development of integrated structures, which are fundamentally different from modern ones. The article presents the methodological foundations of the development of rational solutions governing the information support of the diversification of integrated structures based on optimization models for the management tasks that are being solved. The results of the study allow us to develop certain aspects of the theory of strategic management, the theory of financial management, the theory of economic and mathematical modeling. Their practical application provides an increase in the quality of management of the diversification process of integrated structures and an increase in the efficiency of their activities.


2020 ◽  
pp. 128-131
Author(s):  
И.В. Баранова ◽  
М.А. Власенко

В статье рассмотрен гособоронзаказ как драйвер развития предприятий оборонно-промышленного комплекса, требования обеспечения финансовой устойчивости предприятий при исполнении ими гособоронзаказа. Диверсификация оборонно-промышленного комплекса РФ и конверсия производства предприятий, входящих в данный комплекс, ориентированные на производство продукции двойного назначения, а также повышение объемов продаж в среднесрочной перспективе рассматриваются как факторы повышения их финансовой устойчивости. The article considers the defense procurement and acquisition as a driver for the development of enterprises of the military-industrial complex; the requirements for ensuring the financial stability of enterprises when they perform a state contract under the state defense order. The diversification of the Russian military-industrial complex and the conversion of production of enterprises included in this complex, focused on the production of dual-use products, increasing sales in the medium term, are considered as factors for increasing the financial stability of enterprises in the military-industrial complex.


2020 ◽  
Vol 217 ◽  
pp. 06005
Author(s):  
Elena Dyundik ◽  
Sergey Golubev ◽  
Anastasia Makhova ◽  
Lev Gurtskoy

The paper formulates the main areas of human capital development in the Russian military-industrial complex in the context of digital transformation. To remedy the current situation, it is necessary to change the system of training of employees of the defense industry, including scientific and pedagogical personnel and specialists. To do this, it is necessary to change the regulatory framework that determines the training of personnel for the defense industry enterprises, to develop methodological recommendations for a comprehensive assessment of the state of human resources in the defense industry; to develop new training programs that take into account the needs of the digital economy, to ensure a close connection of educational institutions with the employer of the military-industrial complex, to form a system of corporate training, a knowledge management system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4(73)) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
S.N. Larin ◽  
N.A. Sokolov

At the present stage of socio-economic development of the world community, the dominant paradigm has been the use of high technologies, new scientific knowledge, the introduction of innovations as the leading factors in ensuring effective economic growth and national competitiveness. The article shows the growing role of enterprises of the Russian military-industrial complex in modernizing the domestic economy and implementing its transition to innovative development through the implementation of conversion projects. The necessity of developing new and effective organizational and economic mechanisms and tools for converting R&D results that are adequate to modern conditions for their practical use by enterprises producing civilian products is substantiated. A solution to the problem of optimizing R&D expenses for the enterprises of the military-industrial complex is proposed by determining the price of scientific and technical products at the stage of their development, taking into account the possibility of their use in the implementation of conversion projects


2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Edgerton

This article highlights the until quite recently neglected political-economic thinking in matters of defense in twentieth-century Britain. It argues that retrieving such analyses from the interwar years is an excellent although partial way to get at an alternative picture of interwar defense spending and the arms industry. Interestingly, the political-economic approach fell out of favor in the nuclear age, but became central from the 1970s in critical discussion of British militarism. Yet that political-economic view was limited in that it made important assumptions about the civilian origins and nature of modern war. The article challenges these assumptions, noting the military origins and nature of most military technologies, and indeed of many civilian technologies, too.


Author(s):  
V. Dvorkin

In the present article, methodical guidelines and some specific approaches aimed at the military-technical cooperation efficiency improvement and Russia's status reinforcement are suggested. Problems of the above-mentioned multidimensional cooperation expansion and strengthening, possibilities of their solving are examined. The condition of the domestic military-industrial complex, the degree of the Russian armament and military equipment competitiveness, Russian military efficiency standard are investigated.


1992 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-299
Author(s):  
Roger W. Lotchin

Like many modern historians’ concepts, the notion of political culture comes to us from the social sciences, especially anthropology and political science. One assumes that political culture is a term familiar to most readers. The term metropolitan-military complex may require some explanation. I coined the phrase some years ago when undertaking a study of San Francisco politics. At the time, the inquiry was fairly conventional. Yet as I worked through the struggles over municipal services, labor and management problems, political structure, mass transit, minorities, parties, reformers, bosses, and so forth, the role of the military loomed ever larger. The longer the military was investigated, the more important that role appeared to be. Eventually, I changed the focus of my study from politics, conventionally defined, to the relationship between cities and the military. President Dwight D. Eisenhower used the term military-industrial complex in his 1961 farewell address to describe an alliance among technicians, congressmen, bureaucrats, military men, and businessmen. He did not define his words rigorously, but he left the definite impression that the military-industrial complex (MIC) was national in scope and something close to a conspiracy on behalf of greater defense spending. The president also implied that the MIC had only recently appeared. Subsequent commentators on the subject have largely followed this approach, stressing the importance of conspiracy, militarism, Washington bureaucrats, big business, and big congressmen. They have also accepted the World War II or cold war origins of the alliance as well as its national scope.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document