Trabecular (Spine) bone density increases significantly in the first 6 months after weaning (Factors Affecting Bone Formation After Breastfeeding Pilot Study (FABB-Pilot))

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Cooke-Hubley ◽  
Gerry Mugford ◽  
James Valcour ◽  
Michael Wahl ◽  
Janine Woodrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Factors Affecting

A 5% Increase in Trabecular (Spine) Bone Density Occurs in the First Six Months after Weaning (Factors Affecting Bone Formation after Breastfeeding Pilot Study [FABB-Pilot])

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. S2
Author(s):  
Sandra Cooke-Hubley ◽  
Beth J. Kirby ◽  
Chrissy Wells ◽  
Gerry Mugford ◽  
James Valcour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Factors Affecting

scholarly journals Investigation of the bone density in multiple sclerosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
O. S. Dranichnikova ◽  
V. D. Zavadovskaya ◽  
V. M. Alifirova
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Mass ◽  
Computer Tomography ◽  
Dramatic Decrease ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Common Opinion ◽  
Therapy Sessions

A number of investigations revealed a problem of osteopenic syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis but there is no common opinion concerning factors which lead to its development. We observed 65 patients with multiple sclerosis with various type of its course and disability status of several degree based upon EDSS scale. Ultrasound osteometry of the calcaneus, computer tomography of QCT of L1—L3 vertebras were performed, serum crosslaps, N-MID osteocalcin were used. Decreased bone density, injured bone microarchitectonics and suppression of bone formation and resorption, which were correlated EDSS were found. Correlations with other factors (growth, weight, gender, and number of steroid therapy sessions ) for these parameters was not revealed. This allowed to conclude that the main reason of decreased bone mass in patients with multiple sclerosis is the dramatic decrease in physical activity.

Factors affecting faecal glucocorticoid levels in domestic cats (Felis catus): a pilot study with single and large multi-cat households

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Ramos ◽  
MN Arena ◽  
A Reche-Junior ◽  
AGT Daniel ◽  
MVC Albino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Felis Catus ◽  
Domestic Cats ◽  
Factors Affecting

scholarly journals Does intraoperative bone density testing correlate with parameters of primary implant stability? A pilot study in minipigs

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 594-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Grobecker‐Karl ◽  
Victor Palarie ◽  
Sonja Schneider ◽  
Matthias Karl
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Primary Implant ◽  
Bone Density Testing

scholarly journals Effects of condensation and compressive strain on implant primary stability

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhijun Li ◽  
Masaki Arioka ◽  
Yindong Liu ◽  
Maziar Aghvami ◽  
Serdar Tulu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Density ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Compressive Strain ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Bone Microdamage ◽  
A Site ◽  
Femoral Implants

Aims Surgeons and most engineers believe that bone compaction improves implant primary stability without causing undue damage to the bone itself. In this study, we developed a murine distal femoral implant model and tested this dogma. Methods Each mouse received two femoral implants, one placed into a site prepared by drilling and the other into the contralateral site prepared by drilling followed by stepwise condensation. Results Condensation significantly increased peri-implant bone density but it also produced higher strains at the interface between the bone and implant, which led to significantly more bone microdamage. Despite increased peri-implant bone density, condensation did not improve implant primary stability as measured by an in vivo lateral stability test. Ultimately, the condensed bone underwent resorption, which delayed the onset of new bone formation around the implant. Conclusion Collectively, these multiscale analyses demonstrate that condensation does not positively contribute to implant stability or to new peri-implant bone formation. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(2):60–70.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document