scholarly journals Translational control of lipogenic enzymes in the cell cycle of synchronous, growing yeast cells

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi M Blank ◽  
Ricardo Perez ◽  
Chong He ◽  
Nairita Maitra ◽  
Richard Metz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Lipogenic Enzymes

Translational control of lipogenesis links protein synthesis and phosphoinositide signaling with nuclear division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nairita Maitra ◽  
Staci Hammer ◽  
Clara Kjerfve ◽  
Vytas A Bankaitis ◽  
Michael Polymenis
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Fatty Acid Synthase ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Lipid Synthesis ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Phosphoinositide Signaling ◽  
Eukaryotic Organism

Abstract Continuously dividing cells coordinate their growth and division. How fast cells grow in mass determines how fast they will multiply. Yet, there are few, if any, examples of a metabolic pathway that actively drives a cell cycle event instead of just being required for it. Here, we show that translational upregulation of lipogenic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae increased the abundance of lipids and promoted nuclear elongation and division. De-repressing translation of acetyl CoA carboxylase and fatty acid synthase also suppressed cell cycle-related phenotypes, including delayed nuclear division, associated with Sec14p phosphatidylinositol transfer protein deficiencies, and the irregular nuclear morphologies of mutants defective in phosphatidylinositol 4-OH kinase activities. Our results show that increased lipogenesis drives a critical cell cycle landmark and report a phosphoinositide signaling axis in control of nuclear division. The broad conservation of these lipid metabolic and signaling pathways raises the possibility these activities similarly govern nuclear division in other eukaryotes. In this report, the authors show that increasing lipid synthesis promotes the division of the nucleus in yeast cells, a model eukaryotic organism. They also implicate phosphoinositide signaling in the control of nuclear division. Because lipid metabolic and signaling pathways are highly conserved, it is possible that these activities also control nuclear division in other organisms. AUTHOR SUMMARY In this report, the authors show that increasing lipid synthesis promotes the division of the nucleus in yeast cells, a model eukaryotic organism. They also implicate phosphoinositide signaling in the control of nuclear division. Because lipid metabolic and signaling pathways are highly conserved, it is possible that these activities also control nuclear division in other organisms.

scholarly journals The Meiosis-Specific Crs1 Cyclin Is Required for Efficient S-Phase Progression and Stable Nuclear Architecture

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5483
Author(s):  
Luisa F. Bustamante-Jaramillo ◽  
Celia Ramos ◽  
Cristina Martín-Castellanos
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Single Wave ◽  
Phase Progression

Cyclins and CDKs (Cyclin Dependent Kinases) are key players in the biology of eukaryotic cells, representing hubs for the orchestration of physiological conditions with cell cycle progression. Furthermore, as in the case of meiosis, cyclins and CDKs have acquired novel functions unrelated to this primal role in driving the division cycle. Meiosis is a specialized developmental program that ensures proper propagation of the genetic information to the next generation by the production of gametes with accurate chromosome content, and meiosis-specific cyclins are widespread in evolution. We have explored the diversification of CDK functions studying the meiosis-specific Crs1 cyclin in fission yeast. In addition to the reported role in DSB (Double Strand Break) formation, this cyclin is required for meiotic S-phase progression, a canonical role, and to maintain the architecture of the meiotic chromosomes. Crs1 localizes at the SPB (Spindle Pole Body) and is required to stabilize the cluster of telomeres at this location (bouquet configuration), as well as for normal SPB motion. In addition, Crs1 exhibits CDK(Cdc2)-dependent kinase activity in a biphasic manner during meiosis, in contrast to a single wave of protein expression, suggesting a post-translational control of its activity. Thus, Crs1 displays multiple functions, acting both in cell cycle progression and in several key meiosis-specific events.

scholarly journals Checkpoint Adaptation Precedes Spontaneous and Damage-Induced Genomic Instability in Yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1710-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Galgoczy ◽  
David P. Toczyski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genomic Instability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Checkpoint Adaptation ◽  
Block Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Break Induced Replication

ABSTRACT Despite the fact that eukaryotic cells enlist checkpoints to block cell cycle progression when their DNA is damaged, cells still undergo frequent genetic rearrangements, both spontaneously and in response to genotoxic agents. We and others have previously characterized a phenomenon (adaptation) in which yeast cells that are arrested at a DNA damage checkpoint eventually override this arrest and reenter the cell cycle, despite the fact that they have not repaired the DNA damage that elicited the arrest. Here, we use mutants that are defective in checkpoint adaptation to show that adaptation is important for achieving the highest possible viability after exposure to DNA-damaging agents, but it also acts as an entrée into some forms of genomic instability. Specifically, the spontaneous and X-ray-induced frequencies of chromosome loss, translocations, and a repair process called break-induced replication occur at significantly reduced rates in adaptation-defective mutants. This indicates that these events occur after a cell has first arrested at the checkpoint and then adapted to that arrest. Because malignant progression frequently involves loss of genes that function in DNA repair, adaptation may promote tumorigenesis by allowing genomic instability to occur in the absence of repair.

scholarly journals The Small Subunit Processome Is Required for Cell Cycle Progression at G1

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 5038-5046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara A. Bernstein ◽  
Susan J. Baserga
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Relay Cell ◽  
Ssu Processome ◽  
Nucleolar Rna

Without ribosome biogenesis, translation of mRNA into protein ceases and cellular growth stops. We asked whether ribosome biogenesis is cell cycle regulated in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and we determined that it is not regulated in the same manner as in metazoan cells. We therefore turned our attention to cellular sensors that relay cell size information via ribosome biogenesis. Our results indicate that the small subunit (SSU) processome, a complex consisting of 40 proteins and the U3 small nucleolar RNA necessary for ribosome biogenesis, is not mitotically regulated. Furthermore, Nan1/Utp17, an SSU processome protein, does not provide a link between ribosome biogenesis and cell growth. However, when individual SSU processome proteins are depleted, cells arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This arrest was further supported by the lack of staining for proteins expressed in post-G1. Similarly, synchronized cells depleted of SSU processome proteins did not enter G2. This suggests that when ribosomes are no longer made, the cells stall in the G1. Therefore, yeast cells must grow to a critical size, which is dependent upon having a sufficient number of ribosomes during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, before cell division can occur.

Cell-cycle-dependent translational control

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Pyronnet ◽  
Nahum Sonenberg
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Cycle Dependent

scholarly journals CLN3 expression is sufficient to restore G1-to-S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in translation initiation factor eIF4E

1999 ◽  
Vol 340 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa DANAIE ◽  
Michael ALTMANN ◽  
Michael N. HALL ◽  
Hans TRACHSEL ◽  
Stephen B. HELLIWELL
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Phase Progression ◽  
Type Gene

The essential cap-binding protein (eIF4E) of Saccharomycescerevisiae is encoded by the CDC33 (wild-type) gene, originally isolated as a mutant, cdc33-1, which arrests growth in the G1 phase of the cell cycle at 37 °C. We show that other cdc33 mutants also arrest in G1. One of the first events required for G1-to-S-phase progression is the increased expression of cyclin 3. Constructs carrying the 5ʹ-untranslated region of CLN3 fused to lacZ exhibit weak reporter activity, which is significantly decreased in a cdc33-1 mutant, implying that CLN3 mRNA is an inefficiently translated mRNA that is sensitive to perturbations in the translation machinery. A cdc33-1 strain expressing either stable Cln3p (Cln3-1p) or a hybrid UBI4 5ʹ-CLN3 mRNA, whose translation displays decreased dependence on eIF4E, arrested randomly in the cell cycle. In these cells CLN2 mRNA levels remained high, indicating that Cln3p activity is maintained. Induction of a hybrid UBI4 5ʹ-CLN3 message in a cdc33-1 mutant previously arrested in G1 also caused entry into a new cell cycle. We conclude that eIF4E activity in the G1-phase is critical in allowing sufficient Cln3p activity to enable yeast cells to enter a new cell cycle.

scholarly journals Automatic synchronisation of the cell cycle in budding yeast through closed-loop feedback control

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giansimone Perrino ◽  
Sara Napolitano ◽  
Francesca Galdi ◽  
Antonella La Regina ◽  
Davide Fiore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Genetic System ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Control Engineering ◽  
Loop Feedback ◽  
Experimental Approaches ◽  
Closed Loop Feedback ◽  
Theoretical Foundations

AbstractThe cell cycle is the process by which eukaryotic cells replicate. Yeast cells cycle asynchronously with each cell in the population budding at a different time. Although there are several experimental approaches to synchronise cells, these usually work only in the short-term. Here, we build a cyber-genetic system to achieve long-term synchronisation of the cell population, by interfacing genetically modified yeast cells with a computer by means of microfluidics to dynamically change medium, and a microscope to estimate cell cycle phases of individual cells. The computer implements a controller algorithm to decide when, and for how long, to change the growth medium to synchronise the cell-cycle across the population. Our work builds upon solid theoretical foundations provided by Control Engineering. In addition to providing an avenue for yeast cell cycle synchronisation, our work shows that control engineering can be used to automatically steer complex biological processes towards desired behaviours similarly to what is currently done with robots and autonomous vehicles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document