Defensive Responding to IAT Feedback

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Howell ◽  
Liz Redford ◽  
Gabrielle Pogge ◽  
Kate A. Ratliff
Keyword(s):  
Defensive Responding

Sympathetic recovery in defensive responding.

1970 ◽  
Vol 76 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
William F. Waters
Keyword(s):  
Defensive Responding

scholarly journals Revisiting potential associations between brain morphology, fear acquisition and extinction through new data and a literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mana R. Ehlers ◽  
Janne Nold ◽  
Manuel Kuhn ◽  
Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens ◽  
Tina B. Lonsdorf
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Fear Conditioning ◽  
Cortical Thickness ◽  
Anterior Cingulate ◽  
Brain Morphology ◽  
Small Samples ◽  
Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex ◽  
Defensive Responding ◽  
Brain Behavior ◽  
Subcortical Volume

AbstractInter-individual differences in defensive responding are widely established but their morphological correlates in humans have not been investigated exhaustively. Previous studies reported associations with cortical thickness of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, insula and medial orbitofrontal cortex as well as amygdala volume in fear conditioning studies. However, these associations are partly inconsistent and often derived from small samples. The current study aimed to replicate previously reported associations between physiological and subjective measures of fear acquisition and extinction and brain morphology. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 107 healthy adults who completed a differential cued fear conditioning paradigm with 24 h delayed extinction while skin conductance response (SCR) and fear ratings were recorded. Cortical thickness and subcortical volume were obtained using the software Freesurfer. Results obtained by traditional null hypothesis significance testing and Bayesians statistics do not support structural brain-behavior relationships: Neither differential SCR nor fear ratings during fear acquisition or extinction training could be predicted by cortical thickness or subcortical volume in regions previously reported. In summary, the current pre-registered study does not corroborate associations between brain morphology and inter-individual differences in defensive responding but differences in experimental design and analyses approaches compared to previous work should be acknowledged.

scholarly journals PLDT (planarian light/dark test): an invertebrate assay to quantify defensive responding and study anxiety-like effects

2018 ◽  
Vol 293 ◽  
pp. 284-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashenafi Mebratu Zewde ◽  
Frances Yu ◽  
Sunil Nayak ◽  
Christopher Tallarida ◽  
Allen B. Reitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Defensive Responding

Defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in family custody and access evaluations.

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Michael Bagby ◽  
Robert A. Nicholson ◽  
Tom Buis ◽  
Helen Radovanovic ◽  
Barbara J. Fidler
Keyword(s):  
Defensive Responding ◽  
Custody And Access

Neuroticism and defensive responding

1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary James Liberty
Keyword(s):  
Defensive Responding
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document