Fingerprinting Hydrocarbons in the Biological Resources of the

2009 ◽  
pp. 84-84-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
AE Bence ◽  
WA Burns
Keyword(s):  
Biological Resources

TO THE 100th ANNIVERSARY OF THE BIRTH OF THE PROFESSOR DAVID EFIMOVICH GERSHANOVICH (1920–2007)

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 160-164
Author(s):  
L. L. Demina ◽  
V. V. Gordeev
Keyword(s):  
Science And Technology ◽  
100Th Anniversary ◽  
Shirshov Institute ◽  
Executive Editor ◽  
Biological Resources

The article is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of Professor D.E. Gershanovich, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Honored Worker of Science and Technology of the Russia, Chief Researcher and Advisor to the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy Sciences, Executive Editor of the Series “Biological resources of the hydrosphere and their use.”

scholarly journals Synthesis of green and pure copper oxide nanoparticles using two plant resources via solid-state route and their phytotoxicity assessment

RSC Advances ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 3346-3353
Author(s):  
Iman Khaldari ◽  
Mohammad Reza Naghavi ◽  
Elaheh Motamedi
Keyword(s):  
Solid State ◽  
Copper Oxide ◽  
Pure Copper ◽  
Copper Oxide Nanoparticles ◽  
Oxide Nanoparticles ◽  
Plant Resources ◽  
Stabilizing Agents ◽  
Biological Resources ◽  
Solid State Route ◽  
Conventional Methods

Among the conventional methods in synthesizing nanoparticles, the methods that use biological resources, as reducing and stabilizing agents, can be considered eco-friendly methods.

scholarly journals Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 7746
Author(s):  
Leire Barañano ◽  
Naroa Garbisu ◽  
Itziar Alkorta ◽  
Andrés Araujo ◽  
Carlos Garbisu
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Economics ◽  
Green Economy ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Biological Resources ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
The Core ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Broad Interpretation ◽  
Shed Light

The concept of bioeconomy is a topic of debate, confusion, skepticism, and criticism. Paradoxically, this is not necessarily a negative thing as it is encouraging a fruitful exchange of information, ideas, knowledge, and values, with concomitant beneficial effects on the definition and evolution of the bioeconomy paradigm. At the core of the debate, three points of view coexist: (i) those who support a broad interpretation of the term bioeconomy, through the incorporation of all economic activities based on the production and conversion of renewable biological resources (and organic wastes) into products, including agriculture, livestock, fishing, forestry and similar economic activities that have accompanied humankind for millennia; (ii) those who embrace a much narrower interpretation, reserving the use of the term bioeconomy for new, innovative, and technologically-advanced economic initiatives that result in the generation of high-added-value products and services from the conversion of biological resources; and (iii) those who stand between these two viewpoints. Here, to shed light on this debate, a contextualization of the bioeconomy concept through its links with related concepts (biotechnology, bio-based economy, circular economy, green economy, ecological economics, environmental economics, etc.) and challenges facing humanity today is presented.

scholarly journals Internalizing Animals and Ecosystems in Social Citizenship and Social Policy: From Political Community to Political Country

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6601
Author(s):  
Johan Nordensvard ◽  
Jason Alexandra ◽  
Markus Ketola
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Social Policy ◽  
Social Relation ◽  
Political Community ◽  
Social Citizenship ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Biological Resources ◽  
Land Water

The aim of this editorial is to explore, conceptualize, and research the need to internalize both animals and ecosystems in our understanding of social citizenship and social policy. This editorial should be seen as a brief overview of the themes that should be covered in the contributions to the Special Issue, “Internalizing Animals and Ecosystems in Social Citizenship and Social Policy: From Political Community to Political Country”. This Special Issue argues the importance of integrating animals and ecosystems as a way to re-politicize humans’ social relation with both animals and our ecosystem as in sustainable development and social policy. If environmental policy becomes social policy, we would re-construct social citizenship to include consideration for animals and ecosystems as integral part of social policy. This expansion in scope is a progression from seeing humans as part of a political community to becoming more involved in their political country. This aligns with the concept of Country—an all-encompassing term in Australia, involving a people’s territory, land, water, biological resources, the complex obligations and relationships involved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document