Predictions of Specimen Size Dependence on Fracture Toughness for Cleavage and Ductile Tearing

2009 ◽  
pp. 473-473-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
TL Anderson ◽  
NMR Vanaparthy ◽  
RH Dodds
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Size Dependence ◽  
Specimen Size ◽  
Ductile Tearing

scholarly journals Effect of Testing Method Type and Specimen Size on Mode I Fracture Toughness of Kimachi Sandstone

2019 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minami KATAOKA ◽  
Yuzo OBARA ◽  
Leona VAVRO ◽  
Kamil SOUCEK ◽  
Sang-Ho CHO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Specimen Size ◽  
Mode I ◽  
Mode I Fracture ◽  
Mode I Fracture Toughness ◽  
Testing Method

Determination of Crack-Initiation in Fracture Toughness Testing Using an Experimental Key-Curve Methodology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pothana ◽  
G. Wilkowski ◽  
S. Kalyanam ◽  
J. K. Hong ◽  
C. J. Sallaberry
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Crack Initiation ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Power Law ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Electric Potential ◽  
Crack Mouth Opening Displacement ◽  
Ductile Tearing ◽  
Curve Method ◽  
Unloading Compliance

Abstract A new approach was implemented to confirm the start of ductile tearing relative to assessments by other methods such as direct-current Electric Potential (d-c EP) method in coupon specimens. This approach was developed on the Key-Curve methodology by Ernst/Joyce and is similar to the ASTM E-1820 Load Normalization procedure used to determine J-R curves directly from load versus Load-Line Displacement (LLD) record of the test specimen. It is consistent with Deformation Plasticity relationships for fully plastic behavior. Using this Experimental Key-Curve method, crack initiation can be determined directly from load versus LLD data or load versus Crack-Mouth Opening Displacement (CMOD) obtained from a fracture test without the need for additional instrumentation required for crack initiation detection. It is based on the fact that plastic deformation of homogeneous metals at the crack tip follows a power-law function until the crack tearing initiates. Crack tearing initiation is determined at the point where the power-law fit to the load versus plastic part of CMOD or LLD curve deviates from the total experimental load versus plastic-CMOD or LLD curve. The procedure for fitting of the data requires some care to be exercised such that the fitted data is beyond the elastic region and early small-scale plastic region of the Load-CMOD or Load-LLD curve but include data before crack initiation. An iterative regression analysis was done to achieve this, which is shown in this paper. The iterative fitting in this region typically results with a coefficient of determination (R2) values that are greater than 0.990. This method can be either used in conjunction with other methods such as direct-current Electric Potential (d-c EP) or unloading-compliance methods as a secondary (or primary) confirmation of crack tearing initiation (and even for crack growth); or can be used alone when other methods cannot be used. Furthermore, when using instrumentation methods for determining crack-initiation such as d-c EP method in a fracture toughness test, it is good to have a secondary confirmation of the initiation point in case of instrumentation malfunction or high signal to noise ratio in the measured d-c EP signals. In addition, the Experimental Key-Curve procedure provides relatively smooth data for the fitting procedure, while unloading-compliance data when used to get small crack growth values frequently has significant variability, which is part of the reason that JIC by ASTM E1820 is determined using an offset with some growth past the very start of ductile tearing. In this work, the Experimental Key-Curve method had been successfully used to determine crack tearing initiation and demonstrate the applicability for different fracture toughness specimen geometries such as SEN(T), and C(T) specimens. In all the cases analyzed, the Experimental Key-Curve method gave consistent results that were in good agreement with other crack tearing initiation measuring method such as d-c EP but seemed to result in less scatter.

Ductile Tearing Simulation of Circumferential Cracked Pipe Under Cyclic Loading Using Damage Criteria Determined by Monotonic Pipe Test Data

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ha Hwang ◽  
Gyo-Geun Youn ◽  
Naoki Miura ◽  
Yun-Jae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Ductile Fracture ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Strain Energy ◽  
Fracture Strain ◽  
Damage Model ◽  
Fracture Toughness Test ◽  
Ductile Tearing ◽  
Damage Criteria

To evaluate the structural integrity of nuclear power plant piping, it is important to predict ductile tearing of circumferential cracked pipe from the view point of Leak-Before-Break concept under seismic conditions. CRIEPI (Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry) conducted fracture test on Japanese carbon steel (STS410) circumferential through-wall cracked pipes under monotonic or cyclic bending load in room temperature. Cyclic loading test conducted variable experimental conditions considering effect of stress ratio and amplitude. In the previous study, monotonic fracture pipe test was simulated by modified stress-strain ductile damage model determined by C(T) specimen fracture toughness test. And, ductile fracture of pipe under cyclic loading simulated using damage criteria based on fracture strain energy from C(T) specimen test data. In this study, monotonic pipe test result is applied to determination of damage model based on fracture strain energy, using finite element analysis, without C(T) specimen fracture toughness test. Ductile fracture of pipe under variable cyclic loading conditions simulates using determined fracture energy damage model from monotonic pipe test.

SIZE REQUIREMENTS OF COMPACT SANDWICH SPECIMEN FOR TESTING OF BONE

2007 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 419-431
Author(s):  
SATYA PRASAD PARUCHURU ◽  
ANUJ JAIN ◽  
XIAODU WANG
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Specimen Size ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Hierarchical Microstructure ◽  
Sandwich Specimen ◽  
Toughness Testing ◽  
Scanning Electron

It is well understood that bone quality deteriorates due to aging, disease, etc., and may be affected by factors at different length scales due to its hierarchical microstructure. Fracture toughness is one of the properties that assess bone quality. The compact sandwich (CS) specimen gives a better choice of bone sample size, and therefore suits a wide variety of fracture toughness testing needs and constraints. Reliable and statistically valid overall CS specimen size requirements are established in this paper; these serve as guidelines for choosing the CS specimen size. Finite element analysis (FEA) is used for simulating fracture toughness tests. Experimental fracture toughness tests are carried out to verify the FEA results. The experimental results are verified qualitatively by performing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on the fractured specimen surfaces.

Scaling of Pop-Ins During Brittle Fracture Testing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. J. Coppejans ◽  
C. L. Walters
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Offshore Structures ◽  
Specimen Size ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Unstable Fracture ◽  
Displacement Curve ◽  
Fracture Toughness Test ◽  
Key Factor

Abstract Measurement of the fracture toughness of steel is important for the assurance of the safety of ships and offshore structures, especially when these structures are made of thick sections and/or applied in cold environments. One key factor that will affect the determination of the fracture toughness is a pop-in, which is a short event in which unstable fracture is initiated and then self-arrests. If the pop-in is large enough, it will be used to calculate the fracture toughness. Pop-ins are believed to be the products of local brittle zones, which occur randomly at crack tips and have finite sizes. Fracture toughness testing codes have ways of determining whether a pop-in is critical (thus, identifying the maximum force and displacement to be used in the determination of the toughness of the material) or not important (thus, allowing for the test to proceed). In an ongoing project on the use of small-scale fracture specimens to predict standard fracture toughness test results, we would like to know how pop-in acceptance criteria should be scaled for specimen size. It is expected that the physical size of the brittle zones that cause pop-ins is invariant of specimen size, meaning that the contribution of the pop-in will be proportionally more important for smaller specimens. An analytical method for relating the pop-ins on one specimen size to another specimen size is developed. This method is partially verified by observations on the size of a local brittle zone observed on a fracture surface and the effect of that pop-in on the force-displacement curve during a CTOD test. The analytical method showed that an equivalent pop-in for a small-scale specimen is indeed larger, but that the effect was subtle.

scholarly journals Grain Size Dependence of Fracture Toughness in an Ultrahigh Strength Maraging Steel

1983 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikuni KAWABE ◽  
Seiichi MUNEKI ◽  
Junji TAKAHASHI
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Grain Size ◽  
Maraging Steel ◽  
Size Dependence ◽  
Ultrahigh Strength
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document